Eclipse Qrisp QAOA: description and preliminary comparison with Qiskit counterparts
0
Sign in to get full access
Introduction
This paper presents a description and preliminary comparison of the Eclipse Qrisp Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) with its counterparts in the Qiskit quantum computing framework. QAOA is a quantum algorithm used for solving combinatorial optimization problems, and this work explores how the Eclipse Qrisp implementation differs from and compares to the Qiskit version.
Eclipse Qrisp QAOA
The Eclipse Qrisp programming framework is a quantum computing platform that provides its own implementation of the QAOA algorithm. QAOA is a variational quantum algorithm that can be used to solve combinatorial optimization problems, such as the MaxCut problem, on quantum computers.
The key aspects of the Eclipse Qrisp QAOA implementation include:
- Towards Robust Benchmarking of Quantum Optimization Algorithms: The authors describe the design and architecture of their QAOA implementation within the Eclipse Qrisp framework.
- Quantum Computing with Qiskit: They compare the Eclipse Qrisp QAOA to the QAOA implementation in the popular Qiskit quantum computing library, highlighting the differences in approach and performance.
- PRISTIQ: A Co-Design Framework for Preserving Data Security: The paper discusses how the Eclipse Qrisp QAOA can be used within a broader co-design framework for preserving data security and privacy.
Technical Explanation
The Eclipse Qrisp QAOA implementation follows the general structure of the QAOA algorithm, which involves alternating between two types of gates: a problem Hamiltonian gate that encodes the optimization problem, and a mixer Hamiltonian gate that facilitates exploration of the solution space. The authors describe how they have implemented these components within the Eclipse Qrisp framework, including the specific gates and parameters used.
Compilation of Dynamically Reconfigurable Field-Programmable Qubit Arrays for Efficient Quantum Computation: The paper also discusses how the Eclipse Qrisp QAOA can be integrated with a co-design framework for executing quantum circuits on dynamically reconfigurable qubit arrays, which could potentially lead to more efficient quantum computations.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a useful comparison of the Eclipse Qrisp QAOA implementation with its Qiskit counterpart, highlighting the similarities and differences in approach. However, the analysis is fairly limited in scope, focusing primarily on the high-level algorithm structure and not delving deeply into the specific performance characteristics or optimization techniques used in each framework.
Design and Execution of Quantum Circuits using Tens of Superconducting Qubits: One area that could benefit from further exploration is the potential impact of the co-design approach discussed in the paper, and how it might affect the performance and scalability of the Eclipse Qrisp QAOA compared to other implementations.
Conclusion
This paper provides a preliminary overview of the Eclipse Qrisp QAOA implementation and compares it to the Qiskit version of the algorithm. While the analysis is limited in scope, it offers insights into the design choices and architectural differences between the two frameworks. As quantum computing continues to advance, further research and development in this area could lead to more efficient and practical QAOA implementations for solving combinatorial optimization problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Eclipse Qrisp QAOA: description and preliminary comparison with Qiskit counterparts
Eneko Osaba, Matic Petriv{c}, Izaskun Oregi, Raphael Seidel, Alejandra Ruiz, Sebastian Bock, Michail-Alexandros Kourtis
This paper focuses on the presentation and evaluation of the high-level quantum programming language Eclipse Qrisp. The presented framework, used for developing and compiling quantum algorithms, is measured in terms of efficiency for its implementation of the Quantum Approximation Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) Module. We measure this efficiency and compare it against two alternative QAOA algorithm implementations using IBM's Qiskit toolkit. The evaluation process has been carried out over a benchmark composed of 15 instances of the well-known Maximum Cut Problem. Through this preliminary experimentation, Eclipse Qrisp demonstrated promising results, outperforming both versions of its counterparts in terms of results quality and circuit complexity.
Read more7/22/2024
0
CUAOA: A Novel CUDA-Accelerated Simulation Framework for the QAOA
Jonas Stein, Jonas Blenninger, David Bucher, Josef Peter Eder, Elif c{C}etiner, Maximilian Zorn, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a prominent quantum algorithm designed to find approximate solutions to combinatorial optimization problems, which are challenging for classical computers. In the current era, where quantum hardware is constrained by noise and limited qubit availability, simulating the QAOA remains essential for research. However, existing state-of-the-art simulation frameworks suffer from long execution times or lack comprehensive functionality, usability, and versatility, often requiring users to implement essential features themselves. Additionally, these frameworks are primarily restricted to Python, limiting their use in safer and faster languages like Rust, which offer, e.g., advanced parallelization capabilities. In this paper, we develop a GPU accelerated QAOA simulation framework utilizing the NVIDIA CUDA toolkit. This framework offers a complete interface for QAOA simulations, enabling the calculation of (exact) expectation values, direct access to the statevector, fast sampling, and high-performance optimization methods using an advanced state-of-the-art gradient calculation technique. The framework is designed for use in Python and Rust, providing flexibility for integration into a wide range of applications, including those requiring fast algorithm implementations leveraging QAOA at its core. The new framework's performance is rigorously benchmarked on the MaxCut problem and compared against the current state-of-the-art general-purpose quantum circuit simulation frameworks Qiskit and Pennylane as well as the specialized QAOA simulation tool QOKit. Our evaluation shows that our approach outperforms the existing state-of-the-art solutions in terms of runtime up to multiple orders of magnitude. Our implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/JFLXB/cuaoa and Zenodo.
Read more7/19/2024
🛠️
0
Evidence of Scaling Advantage for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on a Classically Intractable Problem
Ruslan Shaydulin, Changhao Li, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Matthew DeCross, Dylan Herman, Niraj Kumar, Jeffrey Larson, Danylo Lykov, Pierre Minssen, Yue Sun, Yuri Alexeev, Joan M. Dreiling, John P. Gaebler, Thomas M. Gatterman, Justin A. Gerber, Kevin Gilmore, Dan Gresh, Nathan Hewitt, Chandler V. Horst, Shaohan Hu, Jacob Johansen, Mitchell Matheny, Tanner Mengle, Michael Mills, Steven A. Moses, Brian Neyenhuis, Peter Siegfried, Romina Yalovetzky, Marco Pistoia
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a leading candidate algorithm for solving optimization problems on quantum computers. However, the potential of QAOA to tackle classically intractable problems remains unclear. Here, we perform an extensive numerical investigation of QAOA on the low autocorrelation binary sequences (LABS) problem, which is classically intractable even for moderately sized instances. We perform noiseless simulations with up to 40 qubits and observe that the runtime of QAOA with fixed parameters scales better than branch-and-bound solvers, which are the state-of-the-art exact solvers for LABS. The combination of QAOA with quantum minimum finding gives the best empirical scaling of any algorithm for the LABS problem. We demonstrate experimental progress in executing QAOA for the LABS problem using an algorithm-specific error detection scheme on Quantinuum trapped-ion processors. Our results provide evidence for the utility of QAOA as an algorithmic component that enables quantum speedups.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Towards Robust Benchmarking of Quantum Optimization Algorithms
David Bucher, Nico Kraus, Jonas Blenninger, Michael Lachner, Jonas Stein, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien
Benchmarking the performance of quantum optimization algorithms is crucial for identifying utility for industry-relevant use cases. Benchmarking processes vary between optimization applications and depend on user-specified goals. The heuristic nature of quantum algorithms poses challenges, especially when comparing to classical counterparts. A key problem in existing benchmarking frameworks is the lack of equal effort in optimizing for the best quantum and, respectively, classical approaches. This paper presents a comprehensive set of guidelines comprising universal steps towards fair benchmarks. We discuss (1) application-specific algorithm choice, ensuring every solver is provided with the most fitting mathematical formulation of a problem; (2) the selection of benchmark data, including hard instances and real-world samples; (3) the choice of a suitable holistic figure of merit, like time-to-solution or solution quality within time constraints; and (4) equitable hyperparameter training to eliminate bias towards a particular method. The proposed guidelines are tested across three benchmarking scenarios, utilizing the Max-Cut (MC) and Travelling Salesperson Problem (TSP). The benchmarks employ classical mathematical algorithms, such as Branch-and-Cut (BNC) solvers, classical heuristics, Quantum Annealing (QA), and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA).
Read more5/14/2024