On the Effectiveness of Hybrid Pooling in Mixup-Based Graph Learning for Language Processing

Read original: arXiv:2210.03123 - Published 5/24/2024 by Zeming Dong, Qiang Hu, Zhenya Zhang, Yuejun Guo, Maxime Cordy, Mike Papadakis, Yves Le Traon, Jianjun Zhao
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used in natural language and programming language processing tasks, such as text and source code classification.
  • GNNs typically incorporate alternating layers that learn transformations of graph node features, along with graph pooling layers that reduce the number of nodes while preserving semantic information.
  • Recently, a data augmentation technique called Manifold-Mixup has been adopted to enhance GNNs in graph learning tasks, but its performance can be affected by the choice of graph pooling operators.
  • This paper explores how different graph pooling operators impact the performance of Manifold-Mixup in graph learning.

Plain English Explanation

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a type of machine learning model that work with data in the form of graphs, which are collections of nodes (or vertices) connected by edges. GNNs have been particularly useful in tasks like text and source code classification, where the data can be represented as a graph.

Typically, GNNs are built using a series of alternating layers. The first type of layer learns how to transform the features (or characteristics) of each node in the graph. The second type of layer, called a graph pooling layer, takes the transformed node features and reduces the number of nodes in the graph while still preserving the important semantic (or meaning) information.

Recently, researchers have started using a technique called Manifold-Mixup to improve the performance of GNNs in graph learning tasks. Manifold-Mixup creates new synthetic graph data by linearly mixing a pair of existing graph data and their labels. However, the effectiveness of Manifold-Mixup can be influenced by the choice of graph pooling operators used in the GNN.

This paper aims to explore how different graph pooling operators affect the performance of Manifold-Mixup in graph learning. The researchers conducted a comprehensive study using 11 different graph pooling operations, including hybrid pooling operators and non-hybrid pooling operators. The experiments were performed on both natural language datasets (Gossipcop, Politifact) and programming language datasets (JAVA250, Python800).

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the impact of graph pooling operators on the performance of Manifold-Mixup, a data augmentation technique used to enhance graph neural networks (GNNs) in graph learning tasks.

The researchers conducted a comprehensive empirical study, applying Manifold-Mixup to a formal characterization of graph pooling based on 11 different graph pooling operations. This included 9 hybrid pooling operators, such as SPGNN and IntarMix, as well as 2 non-hybrid pooling operators, like GMT and HiGNN.

The experiments were performed on both natural language datasets (Gossipcop, Politifact) and programming language datasets (JAVA250, Python800). The results demonstrate that hybrid pooling operators are more effective for Manifold-Mixup than the standard Max-pooling and the state-of-the-art GMT pooling, in terms of producing more accurate and robust GNN models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough investigation into the impact of graph pooling operators on the performance of Manifold-Mixup in graph learning tasks. The researchers have used a comprehensive set of pooling operations, including both hybrid and non-hybrid approaches, to evaluate their effectiveness.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses solely on the performance of Manifold-Mixup, without considering other data augmentation techniques that may also be affected by the choice of graph pooling operators. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific reasons why hybrid pooling operators outperform the other methods, which could be an area for further research.

It would also be interesting to see how the findings of this study translate to other graph learning tasks, beyond the text and source code classification scenarios explored here. Expanding the evaluation to a wider range of applications could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the interplay between graph pooling and data augmentation techniques.

Conclusion

This paper presents an important contribution to the understanding of how graph pooling operators affect the performance of Manifold-Mixup, a popular data augmentation technique used to enhance graph neural networks (GNNs) in graph learning tasks.

The study's key finding is that hybrid pooling operators, which combine multiple pooling strategies, are more effective for Manifold-Mixup than standard Max-pooling or the state-of-the-art graph multiset transformer (GMT) pooling. This has implications for the design and optimization of GNN architectures, particularly when using data augmentation techniques like Manifold-Mixup.

The insights from this research could inspire further developments in graph learning, potentially leading to more accurate and robust GNN models for applications in natural language processing, programming language analysis, and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

On the Effectiveness of Hybrid Pooling in Mixup-Based Graph Learning for Language Processing

Zeming Dong, Qiang Hu, Zhenya Zhang, Yuejun Guo, Maxime Cordy, Mike Papadakis, Yves Le Traon, Jianjun Zhao

Graph neural network (GNN)-based graph learning has been popular in natural language and programming language processing, particularly in text and source code classification. Typically, GNNs are constructed by incorporating alternating layers which learn transformations of graph node features, along with graph pooling layers that use graph pooling operators (e.g., Max-pooling) to effectively reduce the number of nodes while preserving the semantic information of the graph. Recently, to enhance GNNs in graph learning tasks, Manifold-Mixup, a data augmentation technique that produces synthetic graph data by linearly mixing a pair of graph data and their labels, has been widely adopted. However, the performance of Manifold-Mixup can be highly affected by graph pooling operators, and there have not been many studies that are dedicated to uncovering such affection. To bridge this gap, we take an early step to explore how graph pooling operators affect the performance of Mixup-based graph learning. To that end, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study by applying Manifold-Mixup to a formal characterization of graph pooling based on 11 graph pooling operations (9 hybrid pooling operators, 2 non-hybrid pooling operators). The experimental results on both natural language datasets (Gossipcop, Politifact) and programming language datasets (JAVA250, Python800) demonstrate that hybrid pooling operators are more effective for Manifold-Mixup than the standard Max-pooling and the state-of-the-art graph multiset transformer (GMT) pooling, in terms of producing more accurate and robust GNN models.

Read more

5/24/2024

On the Equivalence of Graph Convolution and Mixup
Total Score

0

On the Equivalence of Graph Convolution and Mixup

Xiaotian Han, Hanqing Zeng, Yu Chen, Shaoliang Nie, Jingzhou Liu, Kanika Narang, Zahra Shakeri, Karthik Abinav Sankararaman, Song Jiang, Madian Khabsa, Qifan Wang, Xia Hu

This paper investigates the relationship between graph convolution and Mixup techniques. Graph convolution in a graph neural network involves aggregating features from neighboring samples to learn representative features for a specific node or sample. On the other hand, Mixup is a data augmentation technique that generates new examples by averaging features and one-hot labels from multiple samples. One commonality between these techniques is their utilization of information from multiple samples to derive feature representation. This study aims to explore whether a connection exists between these two approaches. Our investigation reveals that, under two mild conditions, graph convolution can be viewed as a specialized form of Mixup that is applied during both the training and testing phases. The two conditions are: 1) textit{Homophily Relabel} - assigning the target node's label to all its neighbors, and 2) textit{Test-Time Mixup} - Mixup the feature during the test time. We establish this equivalence mathematically by demonstrating that graph convolution networks (GCN) and simplified graph convolution (SGC) can be expressed as a form of Mixup. We also empirically verify the equivalence by training an MLP using the two conditions to achieve comparable performance.

Read more

9/14/2024

Boosting Graph Pooling with Persistent Homology
Total Score

0

Boosting Graph Pooling with Persistent Homology

Chaolong Ying, Xinjian Zhao, Tianshu Yu

Recently, there has been an emerging trend to integrate persistent homology (PH) into graph neural networks (GNNs) to enrich expressive power. However, naively plugging PH features into GNN layers always results in marginal improvement with low interpretability. In this paper, we investigate a novel mechanism for injecting global topological invariance into pooling layers using PH, motivated by the observation that filtration operation in PH naturally aligns graph pooling in a cut-off manner. In this fashion, message passing in the coarsened graph acts along persistent pooled topology, leading to improved performance. Experimentally, we apply our mechanism to a collection of graph pooling methods and observe consistent and substantial performance gain over several popular datasets, demonstrating its wide applicability and flexibility.

Read more

6/4/2024

A Comprehensive Graph Pooling Benchmark: Effectiveness, Robustness and Generalizability
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Graph Pooling Benchmark: Effectiveness, Robustness and Generalizability

Pengyun Wang, Junyu Luo, Yanxin Shen, Siyu Heng, Xiao Luo

Graph pooling has gained attention for its ability to obtain effective node and graph representations for various downstream tasks. Despite the recent surge in graph pooling approaches, there is a lack of standardized experimental settings and fair benchmarks to evaluate their performance. To address this issue, we have constructed a comprehensive benchmark that includes 15 graph pooling methods and 21 different graph datasets. This benchmark systematically assesses the performance of graph pooling methods in three dimensions, i.e., effectiveness, robustness, and generalizability. We first evaluate the performance of these graph pooling approaches across different tasks including graph classification, graph regression and node classification. Then, we investigate their performance under potential noise attacks and out-of-distribution shifts in real-world scenarios. We also involve detailed efficiency analysis and parameter analysis. Extensive experiments validate the strong capability and applicability of graph pooling approaches in various scenarios, which can provide valuable insights and guidance for deep geometric learning research. The source code of our benchmark is available at https://github.com/goose315/Graph_Pooling_Benchmark.

Read more

6/18/2024