Efficient Inverse Design Optimization through Multi-fidelity Simulations, Machine Learning, and Search Space Reduction Strategies
2312.03654
0
0
🛠️
Abstract
This paper introduces a methodology designed to augment the inverse design optimization process in scenarios constrained by limited compute, through the strategic synergy of multi-fidelity evaluations, machine learning models, and optimization algorithms. The proposed methodology is analyzed on two distinct engineering inverse design problems: airfoil inverse design and the scalar field reconstruction problem. It leverages a machine learning model trained with low-fidelity simulation data, in each optimization cycle, thereby proficiently predicting a target variable and discerning whether a high-fidelity simulation is necessitated, which notably conserves computational resources. Additionally, the machine learning model is strategically deployed prior to optimization to compress the design space boundaries, thereby further accelerating convergence toward the optimal solution. The methodology has been employed to enhance two optimization algorithms, namely Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization. Comparative analyses illustrate performance improvements across both algorithms. Notably, this method is adaptable across any inverse design application, facilitating a synergy between a representative low-fidelity ML model, and high-fidelity simulation, and can be seamlessly applied across any variety of population-based optimization algorithms.}
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a methodology to enhance the inverse design optimization process in resource-constrained scenarios
- Leverages a combination of multi-fidelity evaluations, machine learning models, and optimization algorithms
- Applied to two engineering inverse design problems: airfoil design and scalar field reconstruction
Plain English Explanation
This paper presents a new approach to improve the process of inverse design optimization, which is finding the best design to achieve a desired outcome. The key challenge is that this optimization process can be computationally expensive, especially when working with limited computing resources.
The researchers' solution is to combine several techniques. First, they use multi-fidelity evaluations, which means they use both high-quality but costly simulations as well as faster but lower-quality simulations. A machine learning model is trained on the lower-quality simulation data to quickly predict the desired outcome.
The machine learning model serves two purposes: 1) It determines if a high-quality simulation is necessary in each optimization cycle, thereby saving computational resources. 2) It helps compress the design space before optimization begins, allowing the optimization algorithm to converge faster to the best solution.
The researchers tested this approach on two different inverse design problems: designing an airfoil (the shape of an airplane wing) and reconstructing a 3D scalar field (a mathematical function defined in 3D space). They found that this methodology improved the performance of two popular optimization algorithms, Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization.
Overall, this work demonstrates a versatile approach to enhance inverse design optimization, making it more efficient in resource-constrained scenarios. The synergy of machine learning, multi-fidelity simulations, and optimization algorithms shows promise for a wide range of inverse design applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a methodology to augment the inverse design optimization process in scenarios constrained by limited computational resources. It leverages the strategic combination of multi-fidelity evaluations, machine learning models, and optimization algorithms.
The proposed approach is evaluated on two distinct engineering inverse design problems: airfoil inverse design and the scalar field reconstruction problem.
The key aspects of the methodology are:
-
Machine Learning Model: A machine learning model is trained using low-fidelity simulation data. This model is then used in each optimization cycle to efficiently predict the target variable and determine if a high-fidelity simulation is necessary, thereby conserving computational resources.
-
Design Space Compression: The machine learning model is also strategically deployed prior to optimization to compress the design space boundaries, further accelerating convergence toward the optimal solution.
-
Optimization Algorithms: The methodology has been employed to enhance the performance of two popular optimization algorithms: Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization.
Comparative analyses demonstrate the significant performance improvements achieved across both optimization algorithms when utilizing this proposed methodology. Notably, the authors highlight that this approach is adaptable to any inverse design application, enabling a synergy between a representative low-fidelity machine learning model, high-fidelity simulation, and population-based optimization algorithms.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to address the computational challenges in inverse design optimization, particularly in resource-constrained scenarios. The strategic integration of multi-fidelity evaluations, machine learning models, and optimization algorithms is a novel and promising solution.
One potential limitation, as mentioned in the paper, is the requirement of a representative low-fidelity simulation model to train the machine learning predictors. The accuracy and fidelity of this low-fidelity model can directly impact the performance of the overall methodology. Further research could explore methods to improve the quality of low-fidelity models or investigate alternative approaches to leverage limited high-fidelity data.
Additionally, while the researchers have demonstrated the efficacy of their approach on two specific inverse design problems, it would be valuable to assess the generalizability of the methodology across a broader range of applications and problem domains. Expanding the scope of evaluation could provide deeper insights into the strengths, limitations, and potential areas for improvement.
Overall, this work makes a significant contribution to the field of inverse design optimization by presenting a comprehensive framework that leverages the synergies between various computational techniques. The findings and insights from this research can serve as a valuable foundation for further advancements in this area.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a innovative methodology that combines multi-fidelity evaluations, machine learning models, and optimization algorithms to enhance the inverse design optimization process in resource-constrained scenarios. The proposed approach has been successfully applied to two distinct engineering inverse design problems, demonstrating its versatility and effectiveness in improving the performance of popular optimization algorithms.
The key strengths of this methodology lie in its ability to judiciously utilize computational resources, compress the design space, and seamlessly integrate low-fidelity machine learning models with high-fidelity simulations. These advancements have the potential to significantly accelerate the inverse design optimization process, making it more accessible and practical for a wide range of applications.
As the field of inverse design continues to evolve, this research serves as an important step forward, showcasing the powerful synergies that can be achieved by leveraging the complementary strengths of various computational techniques. Further exploration and expansion of this methodology could lead to even more efficient and robust solutions for tackling complex inverse design challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⚙️
Inverse design of photonic surfaces on Inconel via multi-fidelity machine learning ensemble framework and high throughput femtosecond laser processing
Luka Grbcic, Minok Park, Mahmoud Elzouka, Ravi Prasher, Juliane Muller, Costas P. Grigoropoulos, Sean D. Lubner, Vassilia Zorba, Wibe Albert de Jong
0
0
We demonstrate a multi-fidelity (MF) machine learning ensemble framework for the inverse design of photonic surfaces, trained on a dataset of 11,759 samples that we fabricate using high throughput femtosecond laser processing. The MF ensemble combines an initial low fidelity model for generating design solutions, with a high fidelity model that refines these solutions through local optimization. The combined MF ensemble can generate multiple disparate sets of laser-processing parameters that can each produce the same target input spectral emissivity with high accuracy (root mean squared errors < 2%). SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis shows transparent model interpretability of the complex relationship between laser parameters and spectral emissivity. Finally, the MF ensemble is experimentally validated by fabricating and evaluating photonic surface designs that it generates for improved efficiency energy harvesting devices. Our approach provides a powerful tool for advancing the inverse design of photonic surfaces in energy harvesting applications.
6/4/2024
Enhancing Multi-Objective Optimization through Machine Learning-Supported Multiphysics Simulation
Diego Botache, Jens Decke, Winfried Ripken, Abhinay Dornipati, Franz Gotz-Hahn, Mohamed Ayeb, Bernhard Sick
0
0
This paper presents a methodological framework for training, self-optimising, and self-organising surrogate models to approximate and speed up multiobjective optimisation of technical systems based on multiphysics simulations. At the hand of two real-world datasets, we illustrate that surrogate models can be trained on relatively small amounts of data to approximate the underlying simulations accurately. Including explainable AI techniques allow for highlighting feature relevancy or dependencies and supporting the possible extension of the used datasets. One of the datasets was created for this paper and is made publicly available for the broader scientific community. Extensive experiments combine four machine learning and deep learning algorithms with an evolutionary optimisation algorithm. The performance of the combined training and optimisation pipeline is evaluated by verifying the generated Pareto-optimal results using the ground truth simulations. The results from our pipeline and a comprehensive evaluation strategy show the potential for efficiently acquiring solution candidates in multiobjective optimisation tasks by reducing the number of simulations and conserving a higher prediction accuracy, i.e., with a MAPE score under 5% for one of the presented use cases.
4/4/2024
Transfer learning-assisted inverse modeling in nanophotonics based on mixture density networks
Liang Cheng, Prashant Singh, Francesco Ferranti
0
0
The simulation of nanophotonic structures relies on electromagnetic solvers, which play a crucial role in understanding their behavior. However, these solvers often come with a significant computational cost, making their application in design tasks, such as optimization, impractical. To address this challenge, machine learning techniques have been explored for accurate and efficient modeling and design of photonic devices. Deep neural networks, in particular, have gained considerable attention in this field. They can be used to create both forward and inverse models. An inverse modeling approach avoids the need for coupling a forward model with an optimizer and directly performs the prediction of the optimal design parameters values. In this paper, we propose an inverse modeling method for nanophotonic structures, based on a mixture density network model enhanced by transfer learning. Mixture density networks can predict multiple possible solutions at a time including their respective importance as Gaussian distributions. However, multiple challenges exist for mixture density network models. An important challenge is that an upper bound on the number of possible simultaneous solutions needs to be specified in advance. Also, another challenge is that the model parameters must be jointly optimized, which can result computationally expensive. Moreover, optimizing all parameters simultaneously can be numerically unstable and can lead to degenerate predictions. The proposed approach allows overcoming these limitations using transfer learning-based techniques, while preserving a high accuracy in the prediction capability of the design solutions given an optical response as an input. A dimensionality reduction step is also explored. Numerical results validate the proposed method.
5/22/2024
A Guide to Stochastic Optimisation for Large-Scale Inverse Problems
Matthias J. Ehrhardt, Zeljko Kereta, Jingwei Liang, Junqi Tang
0
0
Stochastic optimisation algorithms are the de facto standard for machine learning with large amounts of data. Handling only a subset of available data in each optimisation step dramatically reduces the per-iteration computational costs, while still ensuring significant progress towards the solution. Driven by the need to solve large-scale optimisation problems as efficiently as possible, the last decade has witnessed an explosion of research in this area. Leveraging the parallels between machine learning and inverse problems has allowed harnessing the power of this research wave for solving inverse problems. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive account of the state-of-the-art in stochastic optimisation from the viewpoint of inverse problems. We present algorithms with diverse modalities of problem randomisation and discuss the roles of variance reduction, acceleration, higher-order methods, and other algorithmic modifications, and compare theoretical results with practical behaviour. We focus on the potential and the challenges for stochastic optimisation that are unique to inverse imaging problems and are not commonly encountered in machine learning. We conclude the survey with illustrative examples from imaging problems to examine the advantages and disadvantages that this new generation of algorithms bring to the field of inverse problems.
6/11/2024