Bayesian Adaptive Calibration and Optimal Design
2405.14440
0
0
🏷️
Abstract
The process of calibrating computer models of natural phenomena is essential for applications in the physical sciences, where plenty of domain knowledge can be embedded into simulations and then calibrated against real observations. Current machine learning approaches, however, mostly rely on rerunning simulations over a fixed set of designs available in the observed data, potentially neglecting informative correlations across the design space and requiring a large amount of simulations. Instead, we consider the calibration process from the perspective of Bayesian adaptive experimental design and propose a data-efficient algorithm to run maximally informative simulations within a batch-sequential process. At each round, the algorithm jointly estimates the parameters of the posterior distribution and optimal designs by maximising a variational lower bound of the expected information gain. The simulator is modelled as a sample from a Gaussian process, which allows us to correlate simulations and observed data with the unknown calibration parameters. We show the benefits of our method when compared to related approaches across synthetic and real-data problems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Calibrating computer models of natural phenomena is essential for applications in the physical sciences.
- Current machine learning approaches often rely on rerunning simulations over a fixed set of designs, potentially neglecting informative correlations across the design space.
- The paper proposes a data-efficient Bayesian adaptive experimental design algorithm to run maximally informative simulations within a batch-sequential process.
- The algorithm jointly estimates the parameters of the posterior distribution and optimal designs by maximising a variational lower bound of the expected information gain.
- The simulator is modelled as a sample from a Gaussian process, allowing for correlations between simulations, observed data, and unknown calibration parameters.
Plain English Explanation
When scientists and engineers build computer models of natural phenomena like the weather or the motion of mechanical systems, they need to calibrate those models to match real-world observations. Current machine learning approaches often do this by repeatedly running their simulations with slightly different input settings and comparing the results to actual data. However, this can be inefficient, as it may miss important relationships between the different inputs and the observed outputs.
Instead, the researchers in this paper propose a new way to calibrate these models. Their approach uses Bayesian adaptive experimental design to figure out which simulation runs would provide the most useful information for improving the model. At each step, the algorithm looks at the current state of the model and the available data, and then decides which new simulation to run that would teach it the most. This helps the model get calibrated more quickly and with fewer total simulation runs.
The key to this approach is modeling the simulator itself as a Gaussian process, which allows the algorithm to understand how the different inputs and outputs of the simulator are related. This lets it make informed decisions about which new simulations to run, rather than just randomly exploring the input space.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a Bayesian adaptive experimental design algorithm for efficient calibration of computer models of natural phenomena. Instead of relying on rerunning simulations over a fixed set of designs as in some related approaches, the algorithm jointly estimates the parameters of the posterior distribution and optimal designs by maximizing a variational lower bound of the expected information gain.
The simulator is modelled as a sample from a Gaussian process, which allows correlating simulations and observed data with the unknown calibration parameters. At each round of the batch-sequential process, the algorithm selects the most informative set of new simulation designs to run, balancing exploration of the design space and exploitation of the current model belief.
The benefits of this approach are demonstrated on both synthetic and real-world problems, where it outperforms related methods in terms of data efficiency and accuracy of the calibrated model.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to the challenge of efficiently calibrating computer models against real-world observations. By framing the calibration process as a Bayesian adaptive experimental design problem, the authors are able to leverage powerful tools from Gaussian process modeling and variational inference to make informed decisions about which simulations to run.
One potential limitation of the approach is the reliance on the Gaussian process assumption, which may not always be appropriate for the underlying simulator. While the authors demonstrate good performance on their test cases, there may be scenarios where the Gaussian process model is not flexible enough to capture the true relationships in the data. Further research could explore hybrid or more flexible modeling approaches to address this potential issue.
Additionally, the computational cost of the variational inference procedure used by the algorithm may be prohibitive for very large-scale simulations or high-dimensional parameter spaces. Investigating ways to scale the method or make it more efficient would be an interesting area for future work.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of model calibration, providing a principled and data-efficient approach that can potentially unlock significant gains in applications where accurate simulations are critical.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel Bayesian adaptive experimental design algorithm for efficiently calibrating computer models of natural phenomena against real-world observations. By modelling the simulator as a Gaussian process and jointly optimizing the posterior parameter distribution and simulation designs, the approach is able to run a minimal number of maximally informative simulations to calibrate the model.
The benefits of this data-efficient calibration method are demonstrated on both synthetic and real-world problems, outperforming related techniques. While the Gaussian process assumption and computational cost of the variational inference procedure are potential limitations, the overall framework represents an important advance in the field of model calibration with significant implications for applications in the physical sciences.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization
Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov
0
0
Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.
6/27/2024
🎲
Posterior Probability Matters: Doubly-Adaptive Calibration for Neural Predictions in Online Advertising
Penghui Wei, Weimin Zhang, Ruijie Hou, Jinquan Liu, Shaoguo Liu, Liang Wang, Bo Zheng
0
0
Predicting user response probabilities is vital for ad ranking and bidding. We hope that predictive models can produce accurate probabilistic predictions that reflect true likelihoods. Calibration techniques aim to post-process model predictions to posterior probabilities. Field-level calibration -- which performs calibration w.r.t. to a specific field value -- is fine-grained and more practical. In this paper we propose a doubly-adaptive approach AdaCalib. It learns an isotonic function family to calibrate model predictions with the guidance of posterior statistics, and field-adaptive mechanisms are designed to ensure that the posterior is appropriate for the field value to be calibrated. Experiments verify that AdaCalib achieves significant improvement on calibration performance. It has been deployed online and beats previous approach.
5/28/2024
🐍
Calibration-Aware Bayesian Learning
Jiayi Huang, Sangwoo Park, Osvaldo Simeone
0
0
Deep learning models, including modern systems like large language models, are well known to offer unreliable estimates of the uncertainty of their decisions. In order to improve the quality of the confidence levels, also known as calibration, of a model, common approaches entail the addition of either data-dependent or data-independent regularization terms to the training loss. Data-dependent regularizers have been recently introduced in the context of conventional frequentist learning to penalize deviations between confidence and accuracy. In contrast, data-independent regularizers are at the core of Bayesian learning, enforcing adherence of the variational distribution in the model parameter space to a prior density. The former approach is unable to quantify epistemic uncertainty, while the latter is severely affected by model misspecification. In light of the limitations of both methods, this paper proposes an integrated framework, referred to as calibration-aware Bayesian neural networks (CA-BNNs), that applies both regularizers while optimizing over a variational distribution as in Bayesian learning. Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed approach in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams.
4/15/2024
🛠️
Adaptive Bayesian Optimization for High-Precision Motion Systems
Christopher Konig, Raamadaas Krishnadas, Efe C. Balta, Alisa Rupenyan
0
0
Controller tuning and parameter optimization are crucial in system design to improve closed-loop system performance. Bayesian optimization has been established as an efficient model-free controller tuning and adaptation method. However, Bayesian optimization methods are computationally expensive and therefore difficult to use in real-time critical scenarios. In this work, we propose a real-time purely data-driven, model-free approach for adaptive control, by online tuning low-level controller parameters. We base our algorithm on GoOSE, an algorithm for safe and sample-efficient Bayesian optimization, for handling performance and stability criteria. We introduce multiple computational and algorithmic modifications for computational efficiency and parallelization of optimization steps. We further evaluate the algorithm's performance on a real precision-motion system utilized in semiconductor industry applications by modifying the payload and reference stepsize and comparing it to an interpolated constrained optimization-based baseline approach.
4/24/2024