Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gates
2305.13409
0
0
🏷️
Abstract
We give a pair of algorithms that efficiently learn a quantum state prepared by Clifford gates and $O(log n)$ non-Clifford gates. Specifically, for an $n$-qubit state $|psirangle$ prepared with at most $t$ non-Clifford gates, our algorithms use $mathsf{poly}(n,2^t,1/varepsilon)$ time and copies of $|psirangle$ to learn $|psirangle$ to trace distance at most $varepsilon$. The first algorithm for this task is more efficient, but requires entangled measurements across two copies of $|psirangle$. The second algorithm uses only single-copy measurements at the cost of polynomial factors in runtime and sample complexity. Our algorithms more generally learn any state with sufficiently large stabilizer dimension, where a quantum state has stabilizer dimension $k$ if it is stabilized by an abelian group of $2^k$ Pauli operators. We also develop an efficient property testing algorithm for stabilizer dimension, which may be of independent interest.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper presents two efficient algorithms for learning the quantum state prepared by Clifford gates and a small number of non-Clifford gates.
- The first algorithm is more efficient but requires entangled measurements across two copies of the quantum state.
- The second algorithm uses only single-copy measurements, but has higher runtime and sample complexity.
- The algorithms can learn any quantum state with a sufficiently large stabilizer dimension, which measures how much the state is stabilized by an abelian group of Pauli operators.
- The paper also develops an efficient algorithm for testing the stabilizer dimension of a quantum state.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers introduce two efficient algorithms that can learn the quantum state prepared using a certain type of quantum gates, known as Clifford gates, and a small number of other gates, called non-Clifford gates.
The quantum state they are trying to learn is represented by the symbol |ψ⟩ and is an n-qubit state, meaning it has n tiny quantum systems (called qubits) that store information. The state |ψ⟩ is prepared using at most t non-Clifford gates, where t is a small number.
The first algorithm the researchers present is more efficient, but it requires the ability to perform measurements that involve entanglement between two copies of the state |ψ⟩. Entanglement is a unique quantum mechanical property where the state of one quantum system depends on the state of another system, even if they are physically separated.
The second algorithm, on the other hand, only requires measurements on single copies of |ψ⟩, but it is less efficient in terms of the time it takes to run and the number of copies of |ψ⟩ it needs to use.
The researchers show that their algorithms can be used to learn any quantum state that has a large enough "stabilizer dimension." A quantum state has a stabilizer dimension of k if it is stabilized by an abelian group of 2^k Pauli operators, which are a special type of quantum operator.
The paper also presents an efficient algorithm for testing the stabilizer dimension of a quantum state, which could be useful for other research.
Technical Explanation
The researchers present two algorithms, called "agnostic tomography" algorithms, that can efficiently learn the quantum state |ψ⟩ prepared using at most t non-Clifford gates, where t is a small number.
The first algorithm, described in Section 3, uses entangled measurements across two copies of |ψ⟩ to achieve a runtime and sample complexity that scales polynomially in n, 2^t, and 1/ε, where ε is the desired accuracy in terms of trace distance. Trace distance is a measure of how different two quantum states are.
The second algorithm, described in Section 4, uses only single-copy measurements, but has a higher runtime and sample complexity that scales polynomially in n, 2^t, and 1/ε. This tradeoff in efficiency is due to the additional complexity of performing entangled measurements in the first algorithm.
The key insight underlying both algorithms is that quantum states with a large stabilizer dimension, i.e., those that are well-approximated by stabilizer states, can be learned efficiently. A quantum state has stabilizer dimension k if it is stabilized by an abelian group of 2^k Pauli operators.
The paper also develops an efficient property testing algorithm, described in Section 5, that can determine the stabilizer dimension of a given quantum state. This algorithm may be of independent interest for other research.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents strong theoretical results and efficient algorithms for learning quantum states prepared with Clifford gates and a small number of non-Clifford gates. The authors carefully analyze the tradeoffs between the two algorithms in terms of their runtime and sample complexity, which provides valuable insights for practitioners.
One potential limitation of the research is that it assumes the quantum state |ψ⟩ is prepared using a small number of non-Clifford gates. In practice, many interesting quantum states may require a larger number of non-Clifford gates to prepare, which could make the algorithms less efficient. The authors acknowledge this limitation and suggest that extending the algorithms to handle more general quantum states is an important direction for future research.
Additionally, the algorithms rely on the ability to perform certain quantum measurements, such as entangled measurements for the first algorithm. In practice, these types of measurements can be challenging to implement, especially for large-scale quantum systems. The feasibility of implementing the algorithms on real-world quantum hardware is an important consideration that the paper does not address in depth.
Overall, this research makes valuable contributions to the field of quantum computing by providing efficient algorithms for learning quantum states with large stabilizer dimensions. The insights and techniques developed in this paper could inform the design of future quantum algorithms and inspire further research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper presents two efficient algorithms for learning the quantum state prepared by Clifford gates and a small number of non-Clifford gates. The first algorithm is more efficient but requires entangled measurements, while the second algorithm uses only single-copy measurements at the cost of higher runtime and sample complexity.
The key insight behind these algorithms is that quantum states with a large stabilizer dimension, i.e., those that are well-approximated by stabilizer states, can be learned efficiently. The paper also introduces an efficient algorithm for testing the stabilizer dimension of a quantum state, which could be useful for other research.
While the paper makes important theoretical contributions, the practical implementation of these algorithms on real-world quantum hardware remains a challenge that requires further investigation. Nonetheless, the ideas and techniques developed in this research could have significant implications for the development of future quantum algorithms and the understanding of quantum states in general.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
T-Count Optimizing Genetic Algorithm for Quantum State Preparation
Andrew Wright, Marco Lewis, Paolo Zuliani, Sadegh Soudjani
0
0
Quantum state preparation is a crucial process within numerous quantum algorithms, and the need for efficient initialization of quantum registers is ever increasing as demand for useful quantum computing grows. The problem arises as the number of qubits to be initialized grows, the circuits required to implement the desired state also exponentially increase in size leading to loss of fidelity to noise. This is mainly due to the susceptibility to environmental effects of the non-Clifford T gate, whose use should thus be reduced as much as possible. In this paper, we present and utilize a genetic algorithm for state preparation circuits consisting of gates from the Clifford + T gate set and optimize them in T-Count as to reduce the impact of noise. Whilst the method presented here does not always produce the most accurate circuits in terms of fidelity, it can generate high-fidelity, non-trivial quantum states such as quantum Fourier transform states. In addition, our algorithm does automatically generate fault tolerantly implementable solutions where the number of the most error prone components is reduced. We present an evaluation of the algorithm when trialed against preparing random, Poisson probability distribution, W, GHZ, and quantum Fourier transform states. We also experimentally demonstrate the scalability issues as qubit count increases, which highlights the need for further optimization of the search process.
6/7/2024
👀
Tight bounds on Pauli channel learning without entanglement
Senrui Chen, Changhun Oh, Sisi Zhou, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Liang Jiang
0
0
Quantum entanglement is a crucial resource for learning properties from nature, but a precise characterization of its advantage can be challenging. In this work, we consider learning algorithms without entanglement to be those that only utilize states, measurements, and operations that are separable between the main system of interest and an ancillary system. Interestingly, we show that these algorithms are equivalent to those that apply quantum circuits on the main system interleaved with mid-circuit measurements and classical feedforward. Within this setting, we prove a tight lower bound for Pauli channel learning without entanglement that closes the gap between the best-known upper and lower bound. In particular, we show that $Theta(2^nvarepsilon^{-2})$ rounds of measurements are required to estimate each eigenvalue of an $n$-qubit Pauli channel to $varepsilon$ error with high probability when learning without entanglement. In contrast, a learning algorithm with entanglement only needs $Theta(varepsilon^{-2})$ copies of the Pauli channel. The tight lower bound strengthens the foundation for an experimental demonstration of entanglement-enhanced advantages for Pauli noise characterization.
4/19/2024
🔗
Agnostic Tomography of Stabilizer Product States
Sabee Grewal, Vishnu Iyer, William Kretschmer, Daniel Liang
0
0
We define a quantum learning task called agnostic tomography, where given copies of an arbitrary state $rho$ and a class of quantum states $mathcal{C}$, the goal is to output a succinct description of a state that approximates $rho$ at least as well as any state in $mathcal{C}$ (up to some small error $varepsilon$). This task generalizes ordinary quantum tomography of states in $mathcal{C}$ and is more challenging because the learning algorithm must be robust to perturbations of $rho$. We give an efficient agnostic tomography algorithm for the class $mathcal{C}$ of $n$-qubit stabilizer product states. Assuming $rho$ has fidelity at least $tau$ with a stabilizer product state, the algorithm runs in time $n^{O(1 + log(1/tau))} / varepsilon^2$. This runtime is quasipolynomial in all parameters, and polynomial if $tau$ is a constant.
4/8/2024
📈
Accurate Learning of Equivariant Quantum Systems from a Single Ground State
v{S}tv{e}p'an v{S}m'id, Roberto Bondesan
0
0
Predicting properties across system parameters is an important task in quantum physics, with applications ranging from molecular dynamics to variational quantum algorithms. Recently, provably efficient algorithms to solve this task for ground states within a gapped phase were developed. Here we dramatically improve the efficiency of these algorithms by showing how to learn properties of all ground states for systems with periodic boundary conditions from a single ground state sample. We prove that the prediction error tends to zero in the thermodynamic limit and numerically verify the results.
5/22/2024