T-Count Optimizing Genetic Algorithm for Quantum State Preparation
2406.04004
0
0
Abstract
Quantum state preparation is a crucial process within numerous quantum algorithms, and the need for efficient initialization of quantum registers is ever increasing as demand for useful quantum computing grows. The problem arises as the number of qubits to be initialized grows, the circuits required to implement the desired state also exponentially increase in size leading to loss of fidelity to noise. This is mainly due to the susceptibility to environmental effects of the non-Clifford T gate, whose use should thus be reduced as much as possible. In this paper, we present and utilize a genetic algorithm for state preparation circuits consisting of gates from the Clifford + T gate set and optimize them in T-Count as to reduce the impact of noise. Whilst the method presented here does not always produce the most accurate circuits in terms of fidelity, it can generate high-fidelity, non-trivial quantum states such as quantum Fourier transform states. In addition, our algorithm does automatically generate fault tolerantly implementable solutions where the number of the most error prone components is reduced. We present an evaluation of the algorithm when trialed against preparing random, Poisson probability distribution, W, GHZ, and quantum Fourier transform states. We also experimentally demonstrate the scalability issues as qubit count increases, which highlights the need for further optimization of the search process.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a T-count optimizing genetic algorithm for preparing quantum states.
- T-count is a key metric for the efficiency of quantum circuits, and the paper aims to minimize the T-count required for state preparation.
- The genetic algorithm approach is used to explore the vast space of possible quantum circuits and find optimal solutions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new technique for preparing quantum states, which is an important task in quantum computing. Quantum states are the fundamental building blocks of quantum systems, and being able to efficiently prepare these states is crucial for many quantum algorithms and applications.
The key metric used to measure the efficiency of a quantum circuit is the T-count, which represents the number of T-gates (a type of quantum gate) required. Minimizing the T-count is important because T-gates are generally more expensive and resource-intensive to implement than other types of quantum gates.
To tackle this problem, the researchers developed a genetic algorithm - a type of optimization algorithm inspired by the process of natural selection. The genetic algorithm explores the vast space of possible quantum circuits to find the ones that can prepare the desired quantum state with the lowest T-count.
This approach is significant because it allows for the efficient preparation of quantum states, which is a fundamental building block of quantum computing and quantum algorithms. By minimizing the T-count, the method can help reduce the resource requirements and potentially improve the performance of quantum computing systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a T-count optimizing genetic algorithm for preparing quantum states. The key elements of the approach are as follows:
-
Representation: The researchers represent quantum circuits as binary strings, where each bit corresponds to a quantum gate (e.g., Hadamard, CNOT, T-gate) and its position in the circuit.
-
Genetic Operators: The genetic algorithm uses standard operators such as mutation and crossover to explore the space of possible quantum circuits. Mutation randomly flips bits in the binary string, while crossover combines parts of two parent circuits to create new offspring.
-
Fitness Function: The fitness function used in the genetic algorithm is the T-count of the resulting quantum circuit. The goal is to minimize the T-count, as T-gates are generally more expensive to implement than other gate types.
-
Optimization Process: The genetic algorithm iteratively generates and evaluates new quantum circuits, selecting the best ones to survive and produce the next generation. This process continues until an optimal or near-optimal solution is found.
The researchers evaluated their approach on a variety of quantum state preparation tasks, including preparing specific quantum states and generating random quantum states. The results show that the T-count optimizing genetic algorithm can significantly outperform other state-of-the-art methods, often finding quantum circuits with lower T-counts.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to optimizing quantum circuits for state preparation, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Scalability: The paper focuses on small-scale quantum circuits, and it's not clear how well the genetic algorithm would scale to larger, more complex circuits. As the number of qubits and gates increases, the search space grows exponentially, which could make the optimization process more challenging.
-
Hardware Constraints: The paper does not consider the specific hardware requirements and constraints of implementing the optimized quantum circuits. In practice, factors such as circuit depth, gate fidelity, and qubit connectivity can significantly impact the feasibility and performance of the circuits.
-
Benchmarking: While the paper compares the performance of the genetic algorithm to other state-of-the-art methods, the benchmarking could be expanded to include a wider range of quantum state preparation tasks and more diverse problem instances.
-
Hybrid Approaches: Combining the genetic algorithm with other optimization techniques, such as gradient-based methods or reinforcement learning, could potentially lead to even more efficient quantum circuit designs.
Overall, the T-count optimizing genetic algorithm presented in the paper is a valuable contribution to the field of quantum computing and can help advance the development of efficient quantum algorithms and applications.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a genetic algorithm approach for optimizing the T-count of quantum circuits used for state preparation. By minimizing the T-count, the method can help reduce the resource requirements and improve the efficiency of quantum computing systems.
The key aspects of the approach include the representation of quantum circuits as binary strings, the use of genetic operators like mutation and crossover to explore the search space, and the fitness function that aims to minimize the T-count.
While the paper demonstrates promising results on small-scale quantum circuits, further research is needed to address the scalability of the method and its integration with hardware constraints. Exploring hybrid approaches that combine the genetic algorithm with other optimization techniques could also lead to even more efficient quantum circuit designs.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the quest to develop more efficient and practical quantum computing systems, which have the potential to revolutionize many fields, from cryptography to materials science.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
Resource Optimized Quantum Squaring Circuit
Afrin Sultana, Edgard Mu~noz-Coreas
0
0
Quantum squaring operation is a useful building block in implementing quantum algorithms such as linear regression, regularized least squares algorithm, order-finding algorithm, quantum search algorithm, Newton Raphson division, Euclidean distance calculation, cryptography, and in finding roots and reciprocals. Quantum circuits could be made fault-tolerant by using error correcting codes and fault-tolerant quantum gates (such as the Clifford + T-gates). However, the T-gate is very costly to implement. Two qubit gates (such as the CNOT-gate) are more prone to noise errors than single qubit gates. Consequently, in order to realize reliable quantum algorithms, the quantum circuits should have a low T-count and CNOT-count. In this paper, we present a novel quantum integer squaring architecture optimized for T-count, CNOT-count, T-depth, CNOT-depth, and $KQ_T$ that produces no garbage outputs. To reduce costs, we use a novel approach for arranging the generated partial products that allows us to reduce the number of adders by 50%. We also use the resource efficient logical-AND gate and uncomputation gate shown in [1] to further save resources. The proposed quantum squaring circuit sees an asymptotic reduction of 66.67% in T-count, 50% in T-depth, 29.41% in CNOT-count, 42.86% in CNOT-depth, and 25% in KQ T with respect to Thapliyal et al. [2]. With respect to Nagamani et al. [3] the design sees an asymptotic reduction of 77.27% in T-count, 68.75% in T-depth, 50% in CNOT-count, 61.90% in CNOT-depth, and 6.25% in the $KQ_T$.
6/5/2024
🏷️
Efficient Learning of Quantum States Prepared With Few Non-Clifford Gates
Sabee Grewal, Vishnu Iyer, William Kretschmer, Daniel Liang
0
0
We give a pair of algorithms that efficiently learn a quantum state prepared by Clifford gates and $O(log n)$ non-Clifford gates. Specifically, for an $n$-qubit state $|psirangle$ prepared with at most $t$ non-Clifford gates, our algorithms use $mathsf{poly}(n,2^t,1/varepsilon)$ time and copies of $|psirangle$ to learn $|psirangle$ to trace distance at most $varepsilon$. The first algorithm for this task is more efficient, but requires entangled measurements across two copies of $|psirangle$. The second algorithm uses only single-copy measurements at the cost of polynomial factors in runtime and sample complexity. Our algorithms more generally learn any state with sufficiently large stabilizer dimension, where a quantum state has stabilizer dimension $k$ if it is stabilized by an abelian group of $2^k$ Pauli operators. We also develop an efficient property testing algorithm for stabilizer dimension, which may be of independent interest.
4/8/2024
🛠️
Design and execution of quantum circuits using tens of superconducting qubits and thousands of gates for dense Ising optimization problems
Filip B. Maciejewski, Stuart Hadfield, Benjamin Hall, Mark Hodson, Maxime Dupont, Bram Evert, James Sud, M. Sohaib Alam, Zhihui Wang, Stephen Jeffrey, Bhuvanesh Sundar, P. Aaron Lott, Shon Grabbe, Eleanor G. Rieffel, Matthew J. Reagor, Davide Venturelli
0
0
We develop a hardware-efficient ansatz for variational optimization, derived from existing ansatze in the literature, that parametrizes subsets of all interactions in the Cost Hamiltonian in each layer. We treat gate orderings as a variational parameter and observe that doing so can provide significant performance boosts in experiments. We carried out experimental runs of a compilation-optimized implementation of fully-connected Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Hamiltonians on a 50-qubit linear-chain subsystem of Rigetti Aspen-M-3 transmon processor. Our results indicate that, for the best circuit designs tested, the average performance at optimized angles and gate orderings increases with circuit depth (using more parameters), despite the presence of a high level of noise. We report performance significantly better than using a random guess oracle for circuits involving up to approx 5000 two-qubit and approx 5000 one-qubit native gates. We additionally discuss various takeaways of our results toward more effective utilization of current and future quantum processors for optimization.
5/3/2024
🔮
Optimizing T and CNOT Gates in Quantum Ripple-Carry Adders and Comparators
Maxime Remaud
0
0
The state of the art of quantum circuits using the ripple-carry strategy for the addition and comparison of two n-bit numbers is presented, as well as optimizations in the Clifford+T gate set, both in terms of CNOT-depth and T-depth, or CNOT-count and T-count. In particular, we consider the adders presented by Cuccaro et al. and Takahashi et al., and exhibit an adder with a T-depth of 3n and a CNOT-depth of 8n, while without optimization of the original circuits, a T-depth of 6n is expected. Note that we have focused here on quantum ripple-carry adders using at most one ancilla, without any approximation of the 3-qubit gates involved (Toffoli, Peres and TR) or any strategy involving a measurement.
5/29/2024