Eliciting New Perspectives in RtD Studies through Annotated Portfolios: A Case Study of Robotic Artefacts

Overview

• This research paper explores the use of annotated portfolios to elicit new perspectives in research through design (RtD) studies, with a focus on robotic artifacts.
• The authors present a case study where they used annotated portfolios to support the exploration of robotic artifacts in an urban environment.
• The study aims to demonstrate how annotated portfolios can uncover intermediate-level knowledge that may be overlooked in traditional RtD approaches.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a technique called "annotated portfolios" that researchers can use to better understand the design of robotic systems. Annotated portfolios involve creating detailed descriptions and reflections on different prototypes or examples of a technology, in this case, urban robots.

The researchers applied this approach to study a set of robotic artifacts designed for use in cities. By carefully documenting and annotating these robotic prototypes, the researchers were able to uncover new insights and perspectives that may have been missed using more traditional research methods.

For example, the annotated portfolios helped reveal "intermediate-level knowledge" - details about the design and function of the robots that fall between high-level concepts and low-level technical specifications. This type of knowledge can provide valuable guidance for future robot designers working on similar urban applications.

Overall, the paper suggests that annotated portfolios can be a powerful tool for Research through Design studies, helping researchers gain a richer understanding of emerging technologies like robotics.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a case study exploring the use of annotated portfolios to support research through design (RtD) investigations of robotic artifacts. RtD is an approach that uses the design process itself as a means of inquiry, generating knowledge through the iterative development of prototypes.

The researchers developed an annotated portfolio of robotic artifacts designed for urban environments. This involved thoroughly documenting and reflecting on a collection of robotic prototypes, capturing details about their design, function, and user interaction. The annotated portfolio was then used as a resource to support analysis and discussion among the research team.

Through this process, the authors demonstrate how annotated portfolios can uncover "intermediate-level knowledge" - insights that fall between high-level conceptual understandings and low-level technical specifications. This type of knowledge, which may be overlooked in traditional RtD approaches, can provide valuable guidance for future design work.

The case study focuses on a set of robotic artefacts intended for use in urban settings, such as task-specialized whegged robots and unconventional field robots. By thoroughly documenting and annotating these prototypes, the researchers were able to uncover new insights about the design tradeoffs, user interactions, and broader societal implications of these robotic systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling demonstration of how annotated portfolios can complement and enrich RtD studies, particularly in the domain of emerging technologies like robotics. The authors acknowledge that this approach requires significant time and effort to execute, which may limit its practical application in some research contexts.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or limitations in the portfolio-building process. The selection of prototypes and the specific annotations included could influence the types of insights uncovered, potentially overlooking important perspectives.

Further research may be needed to better understand how annotated portfolios compare to other RtD methods, such as the use of tangible multi-display toolkits or unconventional field deployments, in terms of their ability to capture intermediate-level knowledge and elicit new design insights.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the importance of thoughtful research practices when investigating emerging technologies, and demonstrating the potential of annotated portfolios as a complementary tool within the RtD arsenal.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a compelling case for the use of annotated portfolios in research through design (RtD) studies, particularly in the domain of robotic artifacts. The authors demonstrate how this approach can uncover important "intermediate-level knowledge" that may be overlooked in traditional RtD methods, providing valuable insights to guide future design work.

The detailed documentation and annotation of robotic prototypes allowed the researchers to explore the design trade-offs, user interactions, and broader societal implications of these emerging technologies. This suggests that annotated portfolios can be a powerful tool for responding to the challenges posed by generative AI technologies and other complex, multifaceted domains.

While the paper acknowledges the significant time and effort required to implement this approach, it highlights the potential value of annotated portfolios in eliciting new perspectives and expanding our understanding of how robotic systems can be designed and deployed in urban environments.