Empirical Evaluation of Public HateSpeech Datasets
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an empirical evaluation of public hate speech datasets, which are used to train machine learning models for detecting and mitigating online hate speech.
- The researchers analyze the characteristics and biases of several widely-used hate speech datasets, including Unseen Targets of Hate, HateDebias, NaijaHate, and From Languages to Geographies.
- The goal is to provide insights into the limitations and challenges of existing hate speech datasets, and to inform the development of more robust and inclusive datasets for this important task.
Plain English Explanation
Hate speech on the internet is a significant problem, and machine learning models are being developed to automatically detect and mitigate it. However, the datasets used to train these models can have their own biases and limitations. This paper takes a close look at several popular hate speech datasets to understand their characteristics and flaws.
The researchers examined factors like the demographic representation of the data, the types of hate speech included, and how well the datasets capture the nuances and context of hateful language. They found that many datasets were skewed towards certain groups or types of hate, and often lacked diversity in the language and perspectives represented.
By understanding these issues, the researchers hope to guide the development of better hate speech datasets in the future. This could lead to more accurate and fair machine learning models that can more effectively combat online hate and protect vulnerable communities.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the literature on existing public hate speech datasets, including Unseen Targets of Hate, HateDebias, NaijaHate, and From Languages to Geographies.
The researchers then describe their methodology for evaluating these datasets. They analyzed factors such as the demographic representation of the data, the types of hate speech included, and the linguistic and contextual diversity of the hateful language. This involved both quantitative and qualitative assessments of the datasets.
The key findings of the study include:
- Many datasets are skewed towards certain demographic groups or types of hate speech, limiting their usefulness for building inclusive and robust hate detection models.
- There is often a lack of nuance and context in how hate speech is annotated, making it challenging to capture the true meaning and impact of hateful language.
- Existing datasets frequently fail to represent the full spectrum of hate speech found in the real world, focusing on only the most overt and extreme forms.
The paper concludes by discussing the implications of these findings and recommending ways to develop more comprehensive and inclusive hate speech datasets in the future.
Critical Analysis
The researchers provide a thorough and well-designed analysis of several prominent hate speech datasets. Their methodical approach to evaluating factors like demographic representation and linguistic diversity is commendable, and the insights they uncover are valuable for guiding the development of better datasets.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into some of the broader challenges and ethical considerations around hate speech detection. For example, it does not address the inherent subjectivity and context-dependence of hate speech, which makes it difficult to define and annotate consistently. There are also open questions about the potential harms and unintended consequences of deploying hate detection models, which the paper does not explore in detail.
Additionally, while the researchers highlight the limitations of existing datasets, they could have provided more concrete suggestions for how to overcome these issues. More guidance on best practices for building diverse, nuanced, and representative hate speech datasets would have strengthened the paper's practical impact.
Overall, this is an important contribution to the ongoing efforts to tackle online hate. By shedding light on the shortcomings of current datasets, the researchers have laid the groundwork for the creation of more robust and inclusive tools to combat this pervasive problem.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of several public hate speech datasets, revealing significant biases and limitations in how these resources have been constructed. The researchers' detailed analysis of factors like demographic representation and linguistic diversity provides valuable insights for guiding the development of better hate speech datasets in the future.
By addressing these dataset-level challenges, the paper lays the groundwork for the creation of more robust and inclusive machine learning models for detecting and mitigating online hate. This is a crucial step towards building a safer and more equitable digital ecosystem, where vulnerable communities are better protected from the harms of hateful speech and behavior.
While the paper does not delve deeply into all of the ethical and practical complexities around hate speech detection, it represents an important contribution to this rapidly evolving field of research. Continued progress in this area will require a sustained, multifaceted effort to ensure that the tools we develop are not only technically effective, but also aligned with core principles of fairness, transparency, and respect for human rights.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Empirical Evaluation of Public HateSpeech Datasets
Sadar Jaf, Basel Barakat
Despite the extensive communication benefits offered by social media platforms, numerous challenges must be addressed to ensure user safety. One of the most significant risks faced by users on these platforms is targeted hate speech. Social media platforms are widely utilised for generating datasets employed in training and evaluating machine learning algorithms for hate speech detection. However, existing public datasets exhibit numerous limitations, hindering the effective training of these algorithms and leading to inaccurate hate speech classification. This study provides a comprehensive empirical evaluation of several public datasets commonly used in automated hate speech classification. Through rigorous analysis, we present compelling evidence highlighting the limitations of current hate speech datasets. Additionally, we conduct a range of statistical analyses to elucidate the strengths and weaknesses inherent in these datasets. This work aims to advance the development of more accurate and reliable machine learning models for hate speech detection by addressing the dataset limitations identified.
Read more7/18/2024
🧪
0
The Unseen Targets of Hate -- A Systematic Review of Hateful Communication Datasets
Zehui Yu, Indira Sen, Dennis Assenmacher, Mattia Samory, Leon Frohling, Christina Dahn, Debora Nozza, Claudia Wagner
Machine learning (ML)-based content moderation tools are essential to keep online spaces free from hateful communication. Yet, ML tools can only be as capable as the quality of the data they are trained on allows them. While there is increasing evidence that they underperform in detecting hateful communications directed towards specific identities and may discriminate against them, we know surprisingly little about the provenance of such bias. To fill this gap, we present a systematic review of the datasets for the automated detection of hateful communication introduced over the past decade, and unpack the quality of the datasets in terms of the identities that they embody: those of the targets of hateful communication that the data curators focused on, as well as those unintentionally included in the datasets. We find, overall, a skewed representation of selected target identities and mismatches between the targets that research conceptualizes and ultimately includes in datasets. Yet, by contextualizing these findings in the language and location of origin of the datasets, we highlight a positive trend towards the broadening and diversification of this research space.
Read more5/15/2024
0
HateDebias: On the Diversity and Variability of Hate Speech Debiasing
Nankai Lin, Hongyan Wu, Zhengming Chen, Zijian Li, Lianxi Wang, Shengyi Jiang, Dong Zhou, Aimin Yang
Hate speech on social media is ubiquitous but urgently controlled. Without detecting and mitigating the biases brought by hate speech, different types of ethical problems. While a number of datasets have been proposed to address the problem of hate speech detection, these datasets seldom consider the diversity and variability of bias, making it far from real-world scenarios. To fill this gap, we propose a benchmark, named HateDebias, to analyze the model ability of hate speech detection under continuous, changing environments. Specifically, to meet the diversity of biases, we collect existing hate speech detection datasets with different types of biases. To further meet the variability (i.e., the changing of bias attributes in datasets), we reorganize datasets to follow the continuous learning setting. We evaluate the detection accuracy of models trained on the datasets with a single type of bias with the performance on the HateDebias, where a significant performance drop is observed. To provide a potential direction for debiasing, we further propose a debiasing framework based on continuous learning and bias information regularization, as well as the memory replay strategies to ensure the debiasing ability of the model. Experiment results on the proposed benchmark show that the aforementioned method can improve several baselines with a distinguished margin, highlighting its effectiveness in real-world applications.
Read more6/10/2024
0
NaijaHate: Evaluating Hate Speech Detection on Nigerian Twitter Using Representative Data
Manuel Tonneau, Pedro Vitor Quinta de Castro, Karim Lasri, Ibrahim Farouq, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian, Victor Orozco-Olvera, Samuel P. Fraiberger
To address the global issue of online hate, hate speech detection (HSD) systems are typically developed on datasets from the United States, thereby failing to generalize to English dialects from the Majority World. Furthermore, HSD models are often evaluated on non-representative samples, raising concerns about overestimating model performance in real-world settings. In this work, we introduce NaijaHate, the first dataset annotated for HSD which contains a representative sample of Nigerian tweets. We demonstrate that HSD evaluated on biased datasets traditionally used in the literature consistently overestimates real-world performance by at least two-fold. We then propose NaijaXLM-T, a pretrained model tailored to the Nigerian Twitter context, and establish the key role played by domain-adaptive pretraining and finetuning in maximizing HSD performance. Finally, owing to the modest performance of HSD systems in real-world conditions, we find that content moderators would need to review about ten thousand Nigerian tweets flagged as hateful daily to moderate 60% of all hateful content, highlighting the challenges of moderating hate speech at scale as social media usage continues to grow globally. Taken together, these results pave the way towards robust HSD systems and a better protection of social media users from hateful content in low-resource settings.
Read more6/26/2024