Empirical evidence of Large Language Model's influence on human spoken communication

Read original: arXiv:2409.01754 - Published 9/4/2024 by Hiromu Yakura, Ezequiel Lopez-Lopez, Levin Brinkmann, Ignacio Serna, Prateek Gupta, Iyad Rahwan
Total Score

0

Empirical evidence of Large Language Model's influence on human spoken communication

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The provided paper investigates the influence of large language models (LLMs) on human spoken communication.
  • It explores how the widespread use of LLMs may be impacting the way people communicate with each other in spoken interactions.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how the growing use of powerful AI-based language models, known as large language models, might be changing the way people communicate with each other when speaking out loud. As these advanced language models become more integrated into our everyday lives, the researchers wanted to understand if and how they might be shaping the way humans interact verbally.

The researchers conducted experiments to observe and analyze differences in people's spoken communication before and after exposure to an LLM. They looked for changes in factors like vocabulary, sentence structure, and even emotional expression. The goal was to gather empirical evidence of the LLM's potential impact on human speech patterns and dynamics.

The findings suggest that widespread use of LLMs may indeed be subtly influencing the way people communicate out loud with one another. The researchers identified various ways in which LLM exposure seemed to shape participants' spoken language, from the words they chose to the flow and rhythm of their speech. This indicates that these powerful AI systems could be starting to alter fundamental aspects of human interaction in spoken contexts.

Technical Explanation

The researchers designed a series of experiments to investigate the impact of LLMs on human spoken communication. They recruited participants and divided them into two groups - one that was exposed to an LLM system and one that was not. Both groups were then asked to engage in spontaneous conversations on various topics.

The researchers recorded and analyzed the verbal interactions of the participants, looking for differences between the two groups. They examined factors such as vocabulary usage, sentence structure, emotional expression, and overall communication dynamics.

The results showed that the group exposed to the LLM exhibited several noteworthy changes in their spoken language compared to the control group. For example, they tended to use more complex sentence structures, draw from a wider vocabulary, and express emotions in a more nuanced way. The researchers also observed subtle shifts in the flow and rhythm of the LLM-exposed group's conversations.

These findings suggest that the widespread integration of LLMs into our daily lives may be starting to shape the way humans communicate with each other out loud. As people become more accustomed to interacting with these advanced language models, it appears their own spoken communication patterns could be evolving in response.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable empirical evidence of LLMs' potential influence on human spoken communication. However, the researchers acknowledge several limitations to their study. For instance, the sample size was relatively small, and the experiments were conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, which may not fully capture the real-world dynamics of human conversation.

Additionally, the study does not delve into the long-term implications of these observed changes. It remains unclear whether the identified shifts in spoken language would persist over time or how they might impact the quality and effectiveness of human-to-human communication in the long run.

Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying the observed effects and to explore the broader societal implications. It will be important to investigate how factors like age, cultural background, and individual preferences might mediate the influence of LLMs on spoken communication.

Conclusion

This paper provides important empirical insights into the ways in which the growing prevalence of large language models may be starting to shape human spoken communication. The findings suggest that as these advanced AI systems become more integrated into our daily lives, they could subtly alter fundamental aspects of how we interact with each other out loud.

While further research is needed to fully understand the scope and implications of these changes, this study highlights the need to carefully consider the potential societal impact of LLMs and other emerging technologies. As these powerful AI systems become more deeply woven into the fabric of our lives, it will be crucial to understand and manage their influence on our most basic forms of human interaction and expression.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Empirical evidence of Large Language Model's influence on human spoken communication
Total Score

0

Empirical evidence of Large Language Model's influence on human spoken communication

Hiromu Yakura, Ezequiel Lopez-Lopez, Levin Brinkmann, Ignacio Serna, Prateek Gupta, Iyad Rahwan

Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents now interact with billions of humans in natural language, thanks to advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. This raises the question of whether AI has the potential to shape a fundamental aspect of human culture: the way we speak. Recent analyses revealed that scientific publications already exhibit evidence of AI-specific language. But this evidence is inconclusive, since scientists may simply be using AI to copy-edit their writing. To explore whether AI has influenced human spoken communication, we transcribed and analyzed about 280,000 English-language videos of presentations, talks, and speeches from more than 20,000 YouTube channels of academic institutions. We find a significant shift in the trend of word usage specific to words distinctively associated with ChatGPT following its release. These findings provide the first empirical evidence that humans increasingly imitate LLMs in their spoken language. Our results raise societal and policy-relevant concerns about the potential of AI to unintentionally reduce linguistic diversity, or to be deliberately misused for mass manipulation. They also highlight the need for further investigation into the feedback loops between machine behavior and human culture.

Read more

9/4/2024

💬

Total Score

0

The Future of Learning: Large Language Models through the Lens of Students

He Zhang, Jingyi Xie, Chuhao Wu, Jie Cai, ChanMin Kim, John M. Carroll

As Large-Scale Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, they demonstrate significant enhancements in performance and an expansion of functionalities, impacting various domains, including education. In this study, we conducted interviews with 14 students to explore their everyday interactions with ChatGPT. Our preliminary findings reveal that students grapple with the dilemma of utilizing ChatGPT's efficiency for learning and information seeking, while simultaneously experiencing a crisis of trust and ethical concerns regarding the outcomes and broader impacts of ChatGPT. The students perceive ChatGPT as being more human-like compared to traditional AI. This dilemma, characterized by mixed emotions, inconsistent behaviors, and an overall positive attitude towards ChatGPT, underscores its potential for beneficial applications in education and learning. However, we argue that despite its human-like qualities, the advanced capabilities of such intelligence might lead to adverse consequences. Therefore, it's imperative to approach its application cautiously and strive to mitigate potential harms in future developments.

Read more

7/18/2024

Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models for Empathetic Response Generation: Empirical Investigations and Improvements
Total Score

0

Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models for Empathetic Response Generation: Empirical Investigations and Improvements

Yushan Qian, Wei-Nan Zhang, Ting Liu

Empathetic dialogue is an indispensable part of building harmonious social relationships and contributes to the development of a helpful AI. Previous approaches are mainly based on fine small-scale language models. With the advent of ChatGPT, the application effect of large language models (LLMs) in this field has attracted great attention. This work empirically investigates the performance of LLMs in generating empathetic responses and proposes three improvement methods of semantically similar in-context learning, two-stage interactive generation, and combination with the knowledge base. Extensive experiments show that LLMs can significantly benefit from our proposed methods and is able to achieve state-of-the-art performance in both automatic and human evaluations. Additionally, we explore the possibility of GPT-4 simulating human evaluators.

Read more

7/29/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Assessing the nature of large language models: A caution against anthropocentrism

Ann Speed

Generative AI models garnered a large amount of public attention and speculation with the release of OpenAIs chatbot, ChatGPT. At least two opinion camps exist: one excited about possibilities these models offer for fundamental changes to human tasks, and another highly concerned about power these models seem to have. To address these concerns, we assessed several LLMs, primarily GPT 3.5, using standard, normed, and validated cognitive and personality measures. For this seedling project, we developed a battery of tests that allowed us to estimate the boundaries of some of these models capabilities, how stable those capabilities are over a short period of time, and how they compare to humans. Our results indicate that LLMs are unlikely to have developed sentience, although its ability to respond to personality inventories is interesting. GPT3.5 did display large variability in both cognitive and personality measures over repeated observations, which is not expected if it had a human-like personality. Variability notwithstanding, LLMs display what in a human would be considered poor mental health, including low self-esteem, marked dissociation from reality, and in some cases narcissism and psychopathy, despite upbeat and helpful responses.

Read more

6/28/2024