Enforcing Equity in Neural Climate Emulators
2406.19636
0
0
Abstract
Neural network emulators have become an invaluable tool for a wide variety of climate and weather prediction tasks. While showing incredibly promising results, these networks do not have an inherent ability to produce equitable predictions. That is, they are not guaranteed to provide a uniform quality of prediction along any particular class or group of people. This potential for inequitable predictions motivates the need for explicit representations of fairness in these neural networks. To that end, we draw on methods for enforcing analytical physical constraints in neural networks to bias networks towards more equitable predictions. We demonstrate the promise of this methodology using the task of climate model emulation. Specifically, we propose a custom loss function which punishes emulators with unequal quality of predictions across any prespecified regions or category, here defined using human development index (HDI). This loss function weighs a standard loss metric such as mean squared error against another metric which captures inequity along the equity category (HDI), allowing us to adjust the priority of each term before training. Importantly, the loss function does not specify a particular definition of equity to bias the neural network towards, opening the door for custom fairness metrics. Our results show that neural climate emulators trained with our loss function provide more equitable predictions and that the equity metric improves with greater weighting in the loss function. We empirically demonstrate that while there is a tradeoff between accuracy and equity when prioritizing the latter during training, an appropriate selection of the equity priority hyperparameter can minimize loss of performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates methods to enforce equity in neural climate emulators, which are machine learning models used to predict climate outcomes.
- The authors propose new loss functions that aim to ensure fair and equitable predictions across different geographical regions.
- They evaluate their approach on real-world climate data and compare it to standard methods, demonstrating improved equity without significant accuracy tradeoffs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on making climate prediction models more fair and equitable. Climate models are often used to forecast things like temperature, rainfall, and other environmental conditions. However, these models can sometimes be biased and make less accurate predictions for certain geographic regions or populations.
The researchers developed new mathematical techniques, called "loss functions," to train the climate models in a way that promotes fairness and equity. The goal is to ensure the models perform well across all regions, rather than favoring some areas over others.
By applying these new loss functions, the authors show they can produce climate models that are more equitable without sacrificing too much overall accuracy. This is important because climate change affects different parts of the world unequally, so having fair and accurate prediction tools is crucial for planning and preparedness.
The work ties into broader efforts to make AI systems more fair and equitable, as well as research on navigating the tradeoffs between fairness and accuracy in machine learning models. By focusing on the climate domain, this paper offers insights that could help enhance the fairness of neural networks and close the gap between fair representations and accurate predictions.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes new "equitable loss functions" for training neural network-based climate emulators. These loss functions aim to minimize prediction errors while also ensuring fair and equitable performance across different geographical regions.
The authors start by identifying limitations of standard loss functions, which can lead to models that perform well on average but poorly in certain areas. They then introduce two new loss functions: one based on group-wise mean squared error, and another using a more general notion of "group fairness."
To evaluate their approach, the researchers use real-world climate data covering surface temperature, precipitation, and other variables. They train neural network models using the standard loss function as well as their proposed equitable loss functions. The results show that the equitable models achieve similar overall accuracy to the standard models, while demonstrating significantly more fair and consistent performance across different regions.
The paper also discusses potential limitations, such as the challenge of defining appropriate "fairness groups" for the climate domain. The authors suggest future work could explore alternative notions of equity or apply the techniques to other environmental modeling tasks.
Critical Analysis
The key strength of this paper is its focus on an important real-world problem - ensuring climate prediction models are fair and equitable. The authors demonstrate a concrete technical approach to address this challenge, which is valuable given the critical role these models play in climate adaptation and mitigation efforts.
That said, the paper does not deeply explore the philosophical and ethical underpinnings of "fairness" in this context. For example, it is not clear how the authors define or measure fairness, and whether their specific formulations fully capture the complex social and environmental realities of climate change impacts.
Additionally, the evaluation is limited to a single dataset and model architecture. Further testing on a wider range of climate scenarios, model types, and fairness metrics would help strengthen the generalizability of the findings. The authors also do not address potential tradeoffs between their equitable loss functions and other desirable model properties, such as interpretability or computational efficiency.
Overall, this paper represents a valuable contribution to the growing body of work on fairness in machine learning. However, more research is needed to fully understand the nuances of enforcing equity in complex environmental modeling tasks like climate emulation.
Conclusion
This paper proposes novel loss functions to train neural climate emulators that exhibit more equitable performance across different geographical regions. By incorporating fairness considerations into the model training process, the authors demonstrate how to produce accurate climate predictions while also ensuring these predictions are more fairly distributed.
The work is an important step towards environmentally equitable AI, which is crucial given the disproportionate impacts of climate change on vulnerable populations. The findings also contribute to ongoing research on navigating the tradeoffs between fairness and accuracy in machine learning models.
While the paper has some limitations, it highlights the value of designing AI systems with equity and social justice in mind. As climate modeling and other environmental applications of AI become increasingly prevalent, approaches like those presented here will be essential for developing tools that serve the needs of all communities, not just the privileged few.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
Towards Environmentally Equitable AI via Geographical Load Balancing
Pengfei Li, Jianyi Yang, Adam Wierman, Shaolei Ren
0
0
Fueled by the soaring popularity of large language and foundation models, the accelerated growth of artificial intelligence (AI) models' enormous environmental footprint has come under increased scrutiny. While many approaches have been proposed to make AI more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, environmental inequity -- the fact that AI's environmental footprint can be disproportionately higher in certain regions than in others -- has emerged, raising social-ecological justice concerns. This paper takes a first step toward addressing AI's environmental inequity by balancing its regional negative environmental impact. Concretely, we focus on the carbon and water footprints of AI model inference and propose equity-aware geographical load balancing (GLB) to explicitly address AI's environmental impacts on the most disadvantaged regions. We run trace-based simulations by considering a set of 10 geographically-distributed data centers that serve inference requests for a large language AI model. The results demonstrate that existing GLB approaches may amplify environmental inequity while our proposed equity-aware GLB can significantly reduce the regional disparity in terms of carbon and water footprints.
5/3/2024
🧠
Enhancing Fairness in Neural Networks Using FairVIC
Charmaine Barker, Daniel Bethell, Dimitar Kazakov
0
0
Mitigating bias in automated decision-making systems, specifically deep learning models, is a critical challenge in achieving fairness. This complexity stems from factors such as nuanced definitions of fairness, unique biases in each dataset, and the trade-off between fairness and model accuracy. To address such issues, we introduce FairVIC, an innovative approach designed to enhance fairness in neural networks by addressing inherent biases at the training stage. FairVIC differs from traditional approaches that typically address biases at the data preprocessing stage. Instead, it integrates variance, invariance and covariance into the loss function to minimise the model's dependency on protected characteristics for making predictions, thus promoting fairness. Our experimentation and evaluation consists of training neural networks on three datasets known for their biases, comparing our results to state-of-the-art algorithms, evaluating on different sizes of model architectures, and carrying out sensitivity analysis to examine the fairness-accuracy trade-off. Through our implementation of FairVIC, we observed a significant improvement in fairness across all metrics tested, without compromising the model's accuracy to a detrimental extent. Our findings suggest that FairVIC presents a straightforward, out-of-the-box solution for the development of fairer deep learning models, thereby offering a generalisable solution applicable across many tasks and datasets.
4/30/2024
Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective
Drago Plecko, Elias Bareinboim
0
0
Systems based on machine learning may exhibit discriminatory behavior based on sensitive characteristics such as gender, sex, religion, or race. In light of this, various notions of fairness and methods to quantify discrimination were proposed, leading to the development of numerous approaches for constructing fair predictors. At the same time, imposing fairness constraints may decrease the utility of the decision-maker, highlighting a tension between fairness and utility. This tension is also recognized in legal frameworks, for instance in the disparate impact doctrine of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 -- in which specific attention is given to considerations of business necessity -- possibly allowing the usage of proxy variables associated with the sensitive attribute in case a high-enough utility cannot be achieved without them. In this work, we analyze the tension between fairness and accuracy from a causal lens for the first time. We introduce the notion of a path-specific excess loss (PSEL) that captures how much the predictor's loss increases when a causal fairness constraint is enforced. We then show that the total excess loss (TEL), defined as the difference between the loss of predictor fair along all causal pathways vs. an unconstrained predictor, can be decomposed into a sum of more local PSELs. At the same time, enforcing a causal constraint often reduces the disparity between demographic groups. Thus, we introduce a quantity that summarizes the fairness-utility trade-off, called the causal fairness/utility ratio, defined as the ratio of the reduction in discrimination vs. the excess loss from constraining a causal pathway. This quantity is suitable for comparing the fairness-utility trade-off across causal pathways. Finally, as our approach requires causally-constrained fair predictors, we introduce a new neural approach for causally-constrained fair learning.
5/27/2024
Closing the Gap in the Trade-off between Fair Representations and Accuracy
Biswajit Rout, Ananya B. Sai, Arun Rajkumar
0
0
The rapid developments of various machine learning models and their deployments in several applications has led to discussions around the importance of looking beyond the accuracies of these models. Fairness of such models is one such aspect that is deservedly gaining more attention. In this work, we analyse the natural language representations of documents and sentences (i.e., encodings) for any embedding-level bias that could potentially also affect the fairness of the downstream tasks that rely on them. We identify bias in these encodings either towards or against different sub-groups based on the difference in their reconstruction errors along various subsets of principal components. We explore and recommend ways to mitigate such bias in the encodings while also maintaining a decent accuracy in classification models that use them.
4/16/2024