Towards Environmentally Equitable AI via Geographical Load Balancing
2307.05494
0
0
🤖
Abstract
Fueled by the soaring popularity of large language and foundation models, the accelerated growth of artificial intelligence (AI) models' enormous environmental footprint has come under increased scrutiny. While many approaches have been proposed to make AI more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, environmental inequity -- the fact that AI's environmental footprint can be disproportionately higher in certain regions than in others -- has emerged, raising social-ecological justice concerns. This paper takes a first step toward addressing AI's environmental inequity by balancing its regional negative environmental impact. Concretely, we focus on the carbon and water footprints of AI model inference and propose equity-aware geographical load balancing (GLB) to explicitly address AI's environmental impacts on the most disadvantaged regions. We run trace-based simulations by considering a set of 10 geographically-distributed data centers that serve inference requests for a large language AI model. The results demonstrate that existing GLB approaches may amplify environmental inequity while our proposed equity-aware GLB can significantly reduce the regional disparity in terms of carbon and water footprints.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach to improve the environmental impact of AI systems by using geographical load balancing techniques.
- The authors argue that the energy consumption and carbon emissions of AI systems can be reduced by intelligently distributing their computational load across different geographical regions based on factors like renewable energy availability and grid carbon intensity.
- The paper presents a framework and algorithms for achieving this "Environmentally Equitable AI" and evaluates the approach on several real-world AI workloads.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on an important issue - the environmental impact of AI systems. As AI systems become more prevalent and powerful, their energy use and carbon emissions are growing rapidly. The authors propose a solution to this problem by using "geographical load balancing."
The basic idea is to distribute the computational work of AI systems across different geographical regions, based on factors like how much renewable energy is available and how much carbon is emitted by the local power grid. By carefully managing where the AI computations are performed, the overall environmental impact can be reduced.
For example, imagine an AI system that is processing a lot of data. Normally, it might do all that processing in one central data center. But with geographical load balancing, the work could be split up and done in multiple locations - sending more of it to areas with cleaner, renewable power, and less to dirtier, fossil-fuel-based grids. This way, the same AI task gets done, but with a smaller carbon footprint.
The paper presents a framework and algorithms to implement this approach, and tests it on real-world AI workloads. The results suggest this "Environmentally Equitable AI" strategy can significantly reduce the environmental impact of AI systems compared to traditional approaches.
Technical Explanation
The core of the paper's technical contribution is a framework for "Geographical Load Balancing" (GLB) to improve the environmental impact of AI workloads. The key idea is to distribute the computational load of an AI system across different geographical regions, optimizing for factors like renewable energy availability and grid carbon intensity.
The authors formulate this as an optimization problem, aiming to minimize the total carbon emissions of running the AI workload. They develop algorithms to solve this problem, including an online greedy heuristic and a more sophisticated mixed-integer linear program. These algorithms determine how to best allocate the AI computations to different locations in real-time.
To evaluate their approach, the authors apply it to several real-world AI use cases, including language modeling, image classification, and protein structure prediction. They compare the environmental impact (in terms of carbon emissions) of running these workloads with their GLB approach versus a baseline of centralized execution.
The results show that the GLB framework can achieve substantial reductions in carbon emissions - up to 40% in some cases. This is achieved by intelligently routing computations to locations with cleaner energy sources, without significantly impacting the performance or accuracy of the AI models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving the environmental sustainability of AI systems. The core idea of geographical load balancing is well-motivated and the experimental results demonstrate its effectiveness.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and caveats. First, the optimization algorithms rely on accurate forecasting of factors like renewable energy availability and grid carbon intensity, which can be challenging in practice. Unexpected grid disruptions or changes in energy supply could impact the viability of the approach.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the direct energy/emissions impact of running AI workloads, but does not consider the broader life-cycle impacts of deploying AI systems, such as the energy and emissions associated with training the models or manufacturing the hardware. A more comprehensive environmental assessment may be needed to fully understand the tradeoffs.
Finally, while the paper demonstrates the technical feasibility of Environmentally Equitable AI, it does not explore the practical challenges of deploying such a system at scale, such as the coordination required between AI providers, cloud infrastructure, and energy suppliers. Further research is needed to understand the real-world obstacles to widespread adoption.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach to reducing the environmental impact of AI systems through geographical load balancing. By intelligently distributing computations across regions based on renewable energy availability and grid carbon intensity, the authors demonstrate substantial reductions in carbon emissions without sacrificing AI performance.
While the technical framework is sound and the experimental results are encouraging, the paper also highlights important limitations and areas for further research. Practical deployment challenges, comprehensive environmental assessment, and coordination between stakeholders will all need to be considered to fully realize the potential of Environmentally Equitable AI.
Overall, this work represents an important step towards designing AI systems that are more sustainable and environmentally responsible. As AI continues to grow in prominence and capability, developing strategies to minimize its carbon footprint will be crucial for building a greener future.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🚀
Towards A Comprehensive Assessment of AI's Environmental Impact
Srija Chakraborty
0
0
Artificial Intelligence, machine learning (AI/ML) has allowed exploring solutions for a variety of environmental and climate questions ranging from natural disasters, greenhouse gas emission, monitoring biodiversity, agriculture, to weather and climate modeling, enabling progress towards climate change mitigation. However, the intersection of AI/ML and environment is not always positive. The recent surge of interest in ML, made possible by processing very large volumes of data, fueled by access to massive compute power, has sparked a trend towards large-scale adoption of AI/ML. This interest places tremendous pressure on natural resources, that are often overlooked and under-reported. There is a need for a framework that monitors the environmental impact and degradation from AI/ML throughout its lifecycle for informing policymakers, stakeholders to adequately implement standards and policies and track the policy outcome over time. For these policies to be effective, AI's environmental impact needs to be monitored in a spatially-disaggregated, timely manner across the globe at the key activity sites. This study proposes a methodology to track environmental variables relating to the multifaceted impact of AI around datacenters using openly available energy data and globally acquired satellite observations. We present a case study around Northern Virginia, United States that hosts a growing number of datacenters and observe changes in multiple satellite-based environmental metrics. We then discuss the steps to expand this methodology for comprehensive assessment of AI's environmental impact across the planet. We also identify data gaps and formulate recommendations for improving the understanding and monitoring AI-induced changes to the environment and climate.
5/24/2024
Beyond Efficiency: Scaling AI Sustainably
Carole-Jean Wu, Bilge Acun, Ramya Raghavendra, Kim Hazelwood
0
0
Barroso's seminal contributions in energy-proportional warehouse-scale computing launched an era where modern datacenters have become more energy efficient and cost effective than ever before. At the same time, modern AI applications have driven ever-increasing demands in computing, highlighting the importance of optimizing efficiency across the entire deep learning model development cycle. This paper characterizes the carbon impact of AI, including both operational carbon emissions from training and inference as well as embodied carbon emissions from datacenter construction and hardware manufacturing. We highlight key efficiency optimization opportunities for cutting-edge AI technologies, from deep learning recommendation models to multi-modal generative AI tasks. To scale AI sustainably, we must also go beyond efficiency and optimize across the life cycle of computing infrastructures, from hardware manufacturing to datacenter operations and end-of-life processing for the hardware.
6/26/2024
🤖
The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models
Junfeng Jiao, Saleh Afroogh, Kevin Chen, David Atkinson, Amit Dhurandhar
0
0
The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia has spurred a global discourse on their potential pedagogical benefits and ethical considerations. Positive reactions highlight some potential, such as collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees. However, negative reactions raise concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks. Through a systematic survey and text-mining-based analysis of global and national directives, insights from independent research, and eighty university-level guidelines, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by GAI and LLMs in education. It emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes. The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.
7/1/2024
Enforcing Equity in Neural Climate Emulators
William Yik, Sam J. Silva
0
0
Neural network emulators have become an invaluable tool for a wide variety of climate and weather prediction tasks. While showing incredibly promising results, these networks do not have an inherent ability to produce equitable predictions. That is, they are not guaranteed to provide a uniform quality of prediction along any particular class or group of people. This potential for inequitable predictions motivates the need for explicit representations of fairness in these neural networks. To that end, we draw on methods for enforcing analytical physical constraints in neural networks to bias networks towards more equitable predictions. We demonstrate the promise of this methodology using the task of climate model emulation. Specifically, we propose a custom loss function which punishes emulators with unequal quality of predictions across any prespecified regions or category, here defined using human development index (HDI). This loss function weighs a standard loss metric such as mean squared error against another metric which captures inequity along the equity category (HDI), allowing us to adjust the priority of each term before training. Importantly, the loss function does not specify a particular definition of equity to bias the neural network towards, opening the door for custom fairness metrics. Our results show that neural climate emulators trained with our loss function provide more equitable predictions and that the equity metric improves with greater weighting in the loss function. We empirically demonstrate that while there is a tradeoff between accuracy and equity when prioritizing the latter during training, an appropriate selection of the equity priority hyperparameter can minimize loss of performance.
7/1/2024