Enhancing Accuracy and Parameter-Efficiency of Neural Representations for Network Parameterization

Read original: arXiv:2407.00356 - Published 7/2/2024 by Hongjun Choi, Jayaraman J. Thiagarajan, Ruben Glatt, Shusen Liu
Total Score

0

Enhancing Accuracy and Parameter-Efficiency of Neural Representations for Network Parameterization

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores methods to enhance the accuracy and parameter-efficiency of neural representations for network parameterization.
  • The researchers investigate techniques to improve the performance of neural networks by predicting model weights using learned neural representations.
  • The paper presents novel approaches to increase the accuracy and parameter-efficiency of these neural representations, with potential applications in areas like meta-learning, weight-sharing, and transfer learning.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks, a type of AI model, are powerful tools for tasks like image recognition and natural language processing. However, training these models can be computationally expensive and require a lot of data. One approach to address this is to use neural representations - compact encodings of the model's structure and parameters. These representations can help reduce the number of parameters needed to define a neural network, making the model more efficient and easier to train.

This paper explores ways to improve the accuracy and efficiency of these neural representations. The researchers tested different techniques to predict a neural network's model weights (the numerical values that define how the network's layers are connected) using only the neural representations. By making the representations more accurate and compact, the researchers aimed to create neural networks that are both high-performing and require fewer parameters.

The insights from this work could lead to advancements in areas like meta-learning, where models can quickly adapt to new tasks, weight-sharing, which allows a single set of parameters to be used across multiple networks, and transfer learning, which enables models trained on one task to be efficiently applied to another.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a method for predicting model weights using neural representations. The key idea is to learn a compact encoding of the neural network's structure and parameters, called a neural representation, and then use this representation to accurately predict the actual model weights.

The researchers experimented with different neural network architectures and training techniques to enhance the accuracy and parameter-efficiency of these neural representations. They explored:

  1. Improving the accuracy of weight prediction: The team tested various neural network designs and loss functions to better map the neural representations to the actual model weights.

  2. Increasing parameter-efficiency: The researchers investigated methods to reduce the number of parameters needed in the neural representation, while maintaining high prediction accuracy. This included techniques like weight sharing and transfer learning.

  3. Scalability to large models: The paper also examined the performance of the proposed methods on large-scale neural networks, such as those used in language modeling and computer vision.

The researchers conducted extensive experiments to evaluate their approaches, comparing them to baseline methods and analyzing the trade-offs between accuracy, parameter-efficiency, and scalability. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed techniques in enhancing the quality and utility of neural representations for network parameterization.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough and well-designed study, exploring multiple avenues to improve the accuracy and efficiency of neural representations for network parameterization. The researchers have carefully considered various aspects, including weight prediction accuracy, parameter-efficiency, and scalability to large models.

One potential limitation of the work is the reliance on specific neural network architectures and training techniques. While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed methods, it's unclear how generalizable these findings are to a broader range of model types and domains. Further research could investigate the performance of the techniques on a more diverse set of neural network architectures and applications.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the computational and memory requirements of the proposed methods. Understanding the practical implications in terms of training and inference costs would be valuable for assessing the real-world feasibility and deployment potential of the approaches.

Overall, the research presented in this paper represents a significant contribution to the field of neural network parameterization and could lead to important advancements in areas like meta-learning, weight-sharing, and transfer learning. Continued exploration and validation of these techniques across a wider range of scenarios could further enhance their impact and practical applications.

Conclusion

This paper explores novel methods to enhance the accuracy and parameter-efficiency of neural representations for network parameterization. The researchers developed techniques to improve the ability to predict a neural network's model weights using only the neural representations, which can lead to more compact and efficient model architectures.

The insights from this work could drive progress in areas like meta-learning, weight-sharing, and transfer learning, enabling the development of versatile and resource-efficient neural networks. Further research to validate the generalizability and practical implications of these approaches could unlock new opportunities for advancing the field of artificial intelligence.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Enhancing Accuracy and Parameter-Efficiency of Neural Representations for Network Parameterization
Total Score

0

Enhancing Accuracy and Parameter-Efficiency of Neural Representations for Network Parameterization

Hongjun Choi, Jayaraman J. Thiagarajan, Ruben Glatt, Shusen Liu

In this work, we investigate the fundamental trade-off regarding accuracy and parameter efficiency in the parameterization of neural network weights using predictor networks. We present a surprising finding that, when recovering the original model accuracy is the sole objective, it can be achieved effectively through the weight reconstruction objective alone. Additionally, we explore the underlying factors for improving weight reconstruction under parameter-efficiency constraints, and propose a novel training scheme that decouples the reconstruction objective from auxiliary objectives such as knowledge distillation that leads to significant improvements compared to state-of-the-art approaches. Finally, these results pave way for more practical scenarios, where one needs to achieve improvements on both model accuracy and predictor network parameter-efficiency simultaneously.

Read more

7/2/2024

Discovering Long-Term Effects on Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning
Total Score

0

Discovering Long-Term Effects on Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning

Gaole Dai, Yiming Tang, Chunkai Fan, Qizhe Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Yulu Gan, Chengqing Zeng, Shanghang Zhang, Tiejun Huang

Pre-trained Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) exhibit robust pattern recognition capabilities and share extensive similarities with the human brain, specifically Biological Neural Networks (BNNs). We are particularly intrigued by these models' ability to acquire new knowledge through fine-tuning. In this regard, Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning (PEFT) has gained widespread adoption as a substitute for full fine-tuning due to its cost reduction in training and mitigation of over-fitting risks by limiting the number of trainable parameters during adaptation. Since both ANNs and BNNs propagate information layer-by-layer, a common analogy can be drawn: weights in ANNs represent synapses in BNNs, while features (also known as latent variables or logits) in ANNs represent neurotransmitters released by neurons in BNNs. Mainstream PEFT methods aim to adjust feature or parameter values using only a limited number of trainable parameters (usually less than 1% of the total parameters), yet achieve surprisingly good results. Building upon this clue, we delve deeper into exploring the connections between feature adjustment and parameter adjustment, resulting in our proposed method Synapses & Neurons (SAN) that learns scaling matrices for features and propagates their effects towards posterior weight matrices. Our approach draws strong inspiration from well-known neuroscience phenomena - Long-term Potentiation (LTP) and Long-term Depression (LTD), which also reveal the relationship between synapse development and neurotransmitter release levels. We conducted extensive comparisons of PEFT on 26 datasets using attention-based networks as well as convolution-based networks, leading to significant improvements compared to other tuning methods (+8.5% over fully-finetune, +7% over Visual Prompt Tuning, and +3.2% over LoRA). The codes would be released.

Read more

9/12/2024

On Learnable Parameters of Optimal and Suboptimal Deep Learning Models
Total Score

0

On Learnable Parameters of Optimal and Suboptimal Deep Learning Models

Ziwei Zheng, Huizhi Liang, Vaclav Snasel, Vito Latora, Panos Pardalos, Giuseppe Nicosia, Varun Ojha

We scrutinize the structural and operational aspects of deep learning models, particularly focusing on the nuances of learnable parameters (weight) statistics, distribution, node interaction, and visualization. By establishing correlations between variance in weight patterns and overall network performance, we investigate the varying (optimal and suboptimal) performances of various deep-learning models. Our empirical analysis extends across widely recognized datasets such as MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and CIFAR-10, and various deep learning models such as deep neural networks (DNNs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and vision transformer (ViT), enabling us to pinpoint characteristics of learnable parameters that correlate with successful networks. Through extensive experiments on the diverse architectures of deep learning models, we shed light on the critical factors that influence the functionality and efficiency of DNNs. Our findings reveal that successful networks, irrespective of datasets or models, are invariably similar to other successful networks in their converged weights statistics and distribution, while poor-performing networks vary in their weights. In addition, our research shows that the learnable parameters of widely varied deep learning models such as DNN, CNN, and ViT exhibit similar learning characteristics.

Read more

8/22/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Expand-and-Cluster: Parameter Recovery of Neural Networks

Flavio Martinelli, Berfin Simsek, Wulfram Gerstner, Johanni Brea

Can we identify the weights of a neural network by probing its input-output mapping? At first glance, this problem seems to have many solutions because of permutation, overparameterisation and activation function symmetries. Yet, we show that the incoming weight vector of each neuron is identifiable up to sign or scaling, depending on the activation function. Our novel method 'Expand-and-Cluster' can identify layer sizes and weights of a target network for all commonly used activation functions. Expand-and-Cluster consists of two phases: (i) to relax the non-convex optimisation problem, we train multiple overparameterised student networks to best imitate the target function; (ii) to reverse engineer the target network's weights, we employ an ad-hoc clustering procedure that reveals the learnt weight vectors shared between students -- these correspond to the target weight vectors. We demonstrate successful weights and size recovery of trained shallow and deep networks with less than 10% overhead in the layer size and describe an `ease-of-identifiability' axis by analysing 150 synthetic problems of variable difficulty.

Read more

6/28/2024