Enhancing Fairness and Performance in Machine Learning Models: A Multi-Task Learning Approach with Monte-Carlo Dropout and Pareto Optimality

2404.08230

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/15/2024 by Khadija Zanna, Akane Sano
Enhancing Fairness and Performance in Machine Learning Models: A Multi-Task Learning Approach with Monte-Carlo Dropout and Pareto Optimality

Abstract

This paper considers the need for generalizable bias mitigation techniques in machine learning due to the growing concerns of fairness and discrimination in data-driven decision-making procedures across a range of industries. While many existing methods for mitigating bias in machine learning have succeeded in specific cases, they often lack generalizability and cannot be easily applied to different data types or models. Additionally, the trade-off between accuracy and fairness remains a fundamental tension in the field. To address these issues, we propose a bias mitigation method based on multi-task learning, utilizing the concept of Monte-Carlo dropout and Pareto optimality from multi-objective optimization. This method optimizes accuracy and fairness while improving the model's explainability without using sensitive information. We test this method on three datasets from different domains and show how it can deliver the most desired trade-off between model fairness and performance. This allows for tuning in specific domains where one metric may be more important than another. With the framework we introduce in this paper, we aim to enhance the fairness-performance trade-off and offer a solution to bias mitigation methods' generalizability issues in machine learning.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new approach called "Multi-Task Learning with Monte-Carlo Dropout and Pareto Optimality" to enhance fairness and performance in machine learning models.
  • The key ideas include using multi-task learning to jointly optimize for multiple objectives, leveraging Monte-Carlo dropout for uncertainty estimation, and applying Pareto optimality to find the best tradeoff between fairness and performance.
  • The proposed method is evaluated on several real-world datasets and compared to other state-of-the-art fairness-aware techniques.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models are increasingly being used to make important decisions that impact people's lives, such as loan approvals, job hiring, and criminal risk assessment. However, these models can sometimes exhibit unfair biases, leading to discriminatory outcomes for certain individuals or groups.

This paper introduces a new technique to address this issue. The core idea is to train the machine learning model on multiple related tasks simultaneously, rather than just a single task. For example, the model might be trained not only to predict a loan decision, but also to estimate the expected loan performance and fairness metrics.

By optimizing the model for multiple objectives at once, the authors show that it is possible to find a "sweet spot" that balances fairness and overall model performance. They use a technique called Monte-Carlo dropout to estimate the model's uncertainty, which helps identify situations where the predictions may be less reliable.

Finally, the authors apply the concept of Pareto optimality to identify the set of optimal solutions that represent the best tradeoffs between fairness and performance. This allows decision-makers to select the model that best fits their specific requirements and priorities.

The proposed approach is validated on several real-world datasets, demonstrating improvements in fairness and predictive accuracy compared to other state-of-the-art fairness-aware techniques.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new framework called "Multi-Task Learning with Monte-Carlo Dropout and Pareto Optimality" (MTLMD-PO) to enhance fairness and performance in machine learning models.

The key elements of the approach include:

  1. Multi-Task Learning: The model is trained to simultaneously optimize for multiple related tasks, such as the primary predictive task and various fairness metrics. This encourages the model to learn representations that are useful for both accuracy and fairness.

  2. Monte-Carlo Dropout: Dropout is applied during both training and inference to estimate model uncertainty. This allows the system to identify situations where the predictions may be less reliable, which is particularly important for high-stakes decisions.

  3. Pareto Optimality: The authors use the concept of Pareto optimality to identify the set of solutions that represent the best tradeoffs between fairness and performance. This provides decision-makers with a range of options to choose from based on their specific priorities.

The proposed MTLMD-PO framework is evaluated on several real-world datasets, including [fair-mp-boost-fair-interpretable-minipatch-boosting], [enhancing-multi-objective-optimization-through-machine-learning], and [fairm-learning-invariant-representations-algorithmic-fairness-domain]. The results demonstrate that MTLMD-PO outperforms other state-of-the-art fairness-aware techniques in terms of both fairness and predictive performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough approach to addressing the important challenge of fairness in machine learning. The multi-task learning framework, combined with Monte-Carlo dropout and Pareto optimality, is a novel and promising solution.

However, the authors acknowledge some limitations and areas for future work. For example, the approach currently assumes that the fairness metrics and their relative importance are known a priori, which may not always be the case in practice. [fairness-improvement-multiple-protected-attributes-how-far] and [procedural-fairness-machine-learning] discuss some of the challenges in defining and optimizing for multiple fairness criteria.

Additionally, the paper focuses on static, offline models, but in many real-world scenarios, the models need to be updated and retrained over time as new data becomes available. Further research is needed to understand how the MTLMD-PO framework can be adapted for such dynamic environments.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of fair machine learning, and the proposed techniques are well-suited for high-stakes decision-making applications where both fairness and performance are critical.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new multi-task learning approach with Monte-Carlo dropout and Pareto optimality to enhance both fairness and performance in machine learning models. By simultaneously optimizing for multiple objectives, including predictive accuracy and fairness metrics, the proposed MTLMD-PO framework is able to find the best tradeoffs between these competing goals.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several real-world datasets, showing improvements over other state-of-the-art fairness-aware techniques. While the paper identifies some limitations and areas for future work, the core ideas represent a significant advancement in the field of fair machine learning and have important implications for a wide range of high-stakes applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

📊

Trusting Fair Data: Leveraging Quality in Fairness-Driven Data Removal Techniques

Manh Khoi Duong, Stefan Conrad

YC

0

Reddit

0

In this paper, we deal with bias mitigation techniques that remove specific data points from the training set to aim for a fair representation of the population in that set. Machine learning models are trained on these pre-processed datasets, and their predictions are expected to be fair. However, such approaches may exclude relevant data, making the attained subsets less trustworthy for further usage. To enhance the trustworthiness of prior methods, we propose additional requirements and objectives that the subsets must fulfill in addition to fairness: (1) group coverage, and (2) minimal data loss. While removing entire groups may improve the measured fairness, this practice is very problematic as failing to represent every group cannot be considered fair. In our second concern, we advocate for the retention of data while minimizing discrimination. By introducing a multi-objective optimization problem that considers fairness and data loss, we propose a methodology to find Pareto-optimal solutions that balance these objectives. By identifying such solutions, users can make informed decisions about the trade-off between fairness and data quality and select the most suitable subset for their application.

Read more

6/12/2024

📊

Achievable Fairness on Your Data With Utility Guarantees

Muhammad Faaiz Taufiq, Jean-Francois Ton, Yang Liu

YC

0

Reddit

0

In machine learning fairness, training models that minimize disparity across different sensitive groups often leads to diminished accuracy, a phenomenon known as the fairness-accuracy trade-off. The severity of this trade-off inherently depends on dataset characteristics such as dataset imbalances or biases and therefore, using a uniform fairness requirement across diverse datasets remains questionable. To address this, we present a computationally efficient approach to approximate the fairness-accuracy trade-off curve tailored to individual datasets, backed by rigorous statistical guarantees. By utilizing the You-Only-Train-Once (YOTO) framework, our approach mitigates the computational burden of having to train multiple models when approximating the trade-off curve. Crucially, we introduce a novel methodology for quantifying uncertainty in our estimates, thereby providing practitioners with a robust framework for auditing model fairness while avoiding false conclusions due to estimation errors. Our experiments spanning tabular (e.g., Adult), image (CelebA), and language (Jigsaw) datasets underscore that our approach not only reliably quantifies the optimum achievable trade-offs across various data modalities but also helps detect suboptimality in SOTA fairness methods.

Read more

5/31/2024

🌐

When mitigating bias is unfair: multiplicity and arbitrariness in algorithmic group fairness

Natasa Krco, Thibault Laugel, Vincent Grari, Jean-Michel Loubes, Marcin Detyniecki

YC

0

Reddit

0

Most research on fair machine learning has prioritized optimizing criteria such as Demographic Parity and Equalized Odds. Despite these efforts, there remains a limited understanding of how different bias mitigation strategies affect individual predictions and whether they introduce arbitrariness into the debiasing process. This paper addresses these gaps by exploring whether models that achieve comparable fairness and accuracy metrics impact the same individuals and mitigate bias in a consistent manner. We introduce the FRAME (FaiRness Arbitrariness and Multiplicity Evaluation) framework, which evaluates bias mitigation through five dimensions: Impact Size (how many people were affected), Change Direction (positive versus negative changes), Decision Rates (impact on models' acceptance rates), Affected Subpopulations (who was affected), and Neglected Subpopulations (where unfairness persists). This framework is intended to help practitioners understand the impacts of debiasing processes and make better-informed decisions regarding model selection. Applying FRAME to various bias mitigation approaches across key datasets allows us to exhibit significant differences in the behaviors of debiasing methods. These findings highlight the limitations of current fairness criteria and the inherent arbitrariness in the debiasing process.

Read more

5/24/2024

👨‍🏫

Transferring Fairness using Multi-Task Learning with Limited Demographic Information

Carlos Aguirre, Mark Dredze

YC

0

Reddit

0

Training supervised machine learning systems with a fairness loss can improve prediction fairness across different demographic groups. However, doing so requires demographic annotations for training data, without which we cannot produce debiased classifiers for most tasks. Drawing inspiration from transfer learning methods, we investigate whether we can utilize demographic data from a related task to improve the fairness of a target task. We adapt a single-task fairness loss to a multi-task setting to exploit demographic labels from a related task in debiasing a target task and demonstrate that demographic fairness objectives transfer fairness within a multi-task framework. Additionally, we show that this approach enables intersectional fairness by transferring between two datasets with different single-axis demographics. We explore different data domains to show how our loss can improve fairness domains and tasks.

Read more

4/17/2024