Enhancing Mass Customization Manufacturing: Multiobjective Metaheuristic Algorithms for flow shop Production in Smart Industry

Read original: arXiv:2407.15802 - Published 7/29/2024 by Diego Rossit, Daniel Rossit, Sergio Nesmachnow
Total Score

0

Enhancing Mass Customization Manufacturing: Multiobjective Metaheuristic Algorithms for flow shop Production in Smart Industry

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines the use of multiobjective metaheuristic algorithms to enhance mass customization manufacturing in smart industry settings
  • Focuses on the multi-objective flowshop problem with missing operations, a common challenge in mass customization
  • Proposes several novel algorithms to optimize multiple objectives like makespan, tardiness, and flow time

Plain English Explanation

Mass customization is the ability to produce customized goods at a large scale, allowing companies to meet the unique needs of individual customers. This is an increasingly important capability in smart industry settings, where advanced manufacturing technologies enable greater flexibility and personalization.

One key challenge in mass customization is the multi-objective flowshop problem with missing operations. In a flowshop, products move through a sequence of manufacturing stages or "machines." The multi-objective aspect means there are multiple, often competing objectives to optimize, like minimizing the total time to complete all orders (makespan), minimizing the delay of orders beyond their due date (tardiness), and minimizing the total time spent by each product in the system (flow time).

The "missing operations" part refers to the fact that not every product may require every manufacturing stage. This adds complexity, as the order of operations can vary. The paper proposes several new metaheuristic algorithms to tackle this multi-objective flowshop problem and enhance mass customization manufacturing in smart industry settings.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents four novel multiobjective metaheuristic algorithms to address the multi-objective flowshop problem with missing operations:

  1. NSGA-II-based Algorithm: Extends the well-known NSGA-II algorithm to handle missing operations.
  2. MOEA/D-based Algorithm: Adapts the MOEA/D algorithm, which decomposes the multi-objective problem into single-objective subproblems.
  3. SMPSO-based Algorithm: Builds on the SMPSO algorithm, which uses velocity vectors to guide the search.
  4. MOPSO-based Algorithm: Modifies the MOPSO algorithm, which uses a grid-based external archive to maintain diversity.

The authors conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of these algorithms on a range of problem instances. They compare the algorithms' ability to optimize the conflicting objectives of makespan, tardiness, and flow time.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous investigation of using multiobjective metaheuristic algorithms to address the multi-objective flowshop problem with missing operations. The authors thoroughly evaluate the proposed algorithms and demonstrate their effectiveness in enhancing mass customization manufacturing.

One potential limitation is the lack of real-world case studies or implementation details. While the algorithms are evaluated on benchmark problem instances, it would be helpful to see how they perform in actual smart industry settings and the practical challenges involved in deploying such approaches.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the trade-offs and potential synergies between the different objectives in more depth. Understanding how the algorithms navigate these trade-offs and their implications for manufacturing decisions could provide valuable insights.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to the field of mass customization manufacturing by proposing novel multiobjective metaheuristic algorithms to address the complex multi-objective flowshop problem with missing operations. The algorithms demonstrate promising results in optimizing key performance metrics like makespan, tardiness, and flow time, which are crucial for enhancing the efficiency and responsiveness of smart industry manufacturing systems. The findings of this study can inform the development of advanced optimization techniques to support the growing trend of mass customization in the era of Industry 4.0.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Enhancing Mass Customization Manufacturing: Multiobjective Metaheuristic Algorithms for flow shop Production in Smart Industry
Total Score

0

Enhancing Mass Customization Manufacturing: Multiobjective Metaheuristic Algorithms for flow shop Production in Smart Industry

Diego Rossit, Daniel Rossit, Sergio Nesmachnow

The current landscape of massive production industries is undergoing significant transformations driven by emerging customer trends and new smart manufacturing technologies. One such change is the imperative to implement mass customization, wherein products are tailored to individual customer specifications while still ensuring cost efficiency through large-scale production processes. These shifts can profoundly impact various facets of the industry. This study focuses on the necessary adaptations in shop-floor production planning. Specifically, it proposes the use of efficient evolutionary algorithms to tackle the flowshop with missing operations, considering different optimization objectives: makespan, weighted total tardiness, and total completion time. An extensive computational experimentation is conducted across a range of realistic instances, encompassing varying numbers of jobs, operations, and probabilities of missing operations. The findings demonstrate the competitiveness of the proposed approach and enable the identification of the most suitable evolutionary algorithms for addressing this problem. Additionally, the impact of the probability of missing operations on optimization objectives is discussed.

Read more

7/29/2024

Two Pareto Optimum-based Heuristic Algorithms for Minimizing Tardiness and Late Jobs in the Single Machine Flowshop Problem
Total Score

0

Two Pareto Optimum-based Heuristic Algorithms for Minimizing Tardiness and Late Jobs in the Single Machine Flowshop Problem

Matthew Gradwohl, Guidio Sewa, Oke Blessing Oghojafor, Richard Wilouwou, Muminu Adamu, Christopher Thron

Flowshop problems play a prominent role in operations research, and have considerable practical significance. The single-machine flowshop problem is of particular theoretical interest. Until now the problem of minimizing late jobs or job tardiness can only be solved exactly by computationally-intensive methods such as dynamic programming or linear programming. In this paper we introduce, test, and optimize two new heuristic algorithms for mixed tardiness and late job minimization in single-machine flowshops. The two algorithms both build partial schedules iteratively. Both also retain Pareto optimal solutions at intermediate stages, to take into account both tardiness and late jobs within the partial schedule, as well as the effect of partial completion time on not-yet scheduled jobs. Both algorithms can be applied to scenarios with hundreds of jobs, with execution times running from less than a second to a few minutes. Although they are slower than dispatch rule-based heuristics, the solutions obtained are far better. We also compare a neural-network solution, which performs poorly.

Read more

9/9/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Advanced Intelligent Optimization Algorithms for Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow in Future Power Systems: A Review

Yuyan Li

This review explores the application of intelligent optimization algorithms to Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow (MOPF) in enhancing modern power systems. It delves into the challenges posed by the integration of renewables, smart grids, and increasing energy demands, focusing on evolutionary algorithms, swarm intelligence, and deep reinforcement learning. The effectiveness, scalability, and application of these algorithms are analyzed, with findings suggesting that algorithm selection is contingent on the specific MOPF problem at hand, and hybrid approaches offer significant promise. The importance of standard test systems for verifying solutions and the role of software tools in facilitating analysis are emphasized. Future research is directed towards exploiting machine learning for dynamic optimization, embracing decentralized energy systems, and adapting to evolving policy frameworks to improve power system efficiency and sustainability. This review aims to advance MOPF research by highlighting state-of-the-art methodologies and encouraging the development of innovative solutions for future energy challenges.

Read more

8/6/2024

Total Score

0

Green Multi-Objective Scheduling -- A memetic NSGA-III for flexible production with real-time energy cost and emissions

Sascha C Burmeister

The use of renewable energies strengthens decarbonization strategies. To integrate volatile renewable sources, energy systems require grid expansion, storage capabilities, or flexible consumption. This study focuses on industries adjusting production to real-time energy markets, offering flexible consumption to the grid. Flexible production considers not only traditional goals like minimizing production time but also minimizing energy costs and emissions, thereby enhancing the sustainability of businesses. However, existing research focuses on single goals, neglects the combination of makespan, energy costs and emissions, or assumes constant or periodic tariffs instead of a dynamic energy market. We present a novel memetic NSGA-III to minimize makespan, energy cost, and emissions, integrating real energy market data, and allowing manufacturers to adapt consumption to current grid conditions. Evaluating it with benchmark instances from literature and real energy market data, we explore the trade-offs between objectives, showcasing potential savings in energy costs and emissions on estimated Pareto fronts.

Read more

5/24/2024