Evaluating the Generalization Ability of Quantized LLMs: Benchmark, Analysis, and Toolbox
2406.12928
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited exciting progress in multiple scenarios, while the huge computational demands hinder their deployments in lots of real-world applications. As an effective means to reduce memory footprint and inference cost, quantization also faces challenges in performance degradation at low bit-widths. Understanding the impact of quantization on LLM capabilities, especially the generalization ability, is crucial. However, the community's main focus remains on the algorithms and models of quantization, with insufficient attention given to whether the quantized models can retain the strong generalization abilities of LLMs. In this work, we fill this gap by providing a comprehensive benchmark suite for this research topic, including an evaluation system, detailed analyses, and a general toolbox. Specifically, based on the dominant pipeline in LLM quantization, we primarily explore the impact of calibration data distribution on the generalization of quantized LLMs and conduct the benchmark using more than 40 datasets within two main scenarios. Based on this benchmark, we conduct extensive experiments with two well-known LLMs (English and Chinese) and four quantization algorithms to investigate this topic in-depth, yielding several counter-intuitive and valuable findings, e.g., models quantized using a calibration set with the same distribution as the test data are not necessarily optimal. Besides, to facilitate future research, we also release a modular-designed toolbox, which decouples the overall pipeline into several separate components, e.g., base LLM module, dataset module, quantizer module, etc. and allows subsequent researchers to easily assemble their methods through a simple configuration. Our benchmark suite is publicly available at https://github.com/TsingmaoAI/MI-optimize
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper evaluates the generalization ability of quantized large language models (LLMs), which are LLMs that have been compressed using techniques like quantization to reduce their model size and computational requirements.
- The researchers develop a new benchmark called LLM-QBench to assess the performance of quantized LLMs across a range of tasks, and they analyze the impact of different quantization strategies.
- The paper also introduces a toolbox to help researchers and engineers work with quantized LLMs more effectively.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on quantized large language models (LLMs), which are a type of AI model that have been compressed using techniques like quantization. This compression allows the models to be smaller and faster, which is important for deploying them on devices with limited resources, like smartphones.
The researchers create a new benchmark called LLM-QBench to evaluate how well these quantized LLMs can generalize, or perform, on a variety of different tasks. They also analyze the impact of using different quantization strategies, which are the specific techniques used to compress the models.
In addition, the paper introduces a toolbox to help researchers and engineers work more easily with these quantized LLMs, making it easier for them to use the models in their own projects.
Technical Explanation
The paper first presents a standard setting for assessing the generalization ability of quantized LLMs using the LLM-QBench benchmark. This involves evaluating the models on a range of tasks, including natural language understanding, text generation, and knowledge-intensive tasks.
The researchers then analyze the impact of different quantization strategies on the models' performance, including uniform quantization, dynamic quantization, and mixed precision quantization. They find that the choice of quantization strategy can have a significant impact on the models' ability to generalize.
The paper also introduces a toolbox that provides a set of tools and utilities for working with quantized LLMs, including model conversion, evaluation, and deployment capabilities. This toolbox is designed to make it easier for researchers and engineers to work with these models in their own projects.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of the generalization ability of quantized LLMs, and the LLM-QBench benchmark introduced in the paper could become a valuable tool for the research community.
However, the paper does not address potential biases or fairness issues that may arise from the use of quantized LLMs, which is an important consideration when deploying these models in real-world applications. Additionally, the paper does not explore the trade-offs between model size, computational requirements, and performance in depth, which could be a valuable area for further research.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of quantized LLMs by developing a new benchmark for evaluating their generalization ability and analyzing the impact of different quantization strategies. The introduction of a toolbox for working with these models is also a valuable addition that could facilitate their adoption and use in a wide range of applications.
As quantized LLMs continue to be an area of active research and development, this paper provides a solid foundation for understanding their capabilities and limitations, and highlights the need for further work in addressing potential issues related to bias, fairness, and the trade-offs between model size, computational requirements, and performance.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
LLM-QBench: A Benchmark Towards the Best Practice for Post-training Quantization of Large Language Models
Ruihao Gong, Yang Yong, Shiqiao Gu, Yushi Huang, Yunchen Zhang, Xianglong Liu, Dacheng Tao
0
0
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) are propelling us toward artificial general intelligence, thanks to their remarkable emergent abilities and reasoning capabilities. However, the substantial computational and memory requirements of LLMs limit their widespread adoption. Quan- tization, a key compression technique, offers a viable solution to mitigate these demands by compressing and accelerating LLMs, albeit with poten- tial risks to model accuracy. Numerous studies have aimed to minimize the accuracy loss associated with quantization. However, the quantization configurations in these studies vary and may not be optimized for hard- ware compatibility. In this paper, we focus on identifying the most effective practices for quantizing LLMs, with the goal of balancing performance with computational efficiency. For a fair analysis, we develop a quantization toolkit LLMC, and design four crucial principles considering the inference efficiency, quantized accuracy, calibration cost, and modularization. By benchmarking on various models and datasets with over 500 experiments, three takeaways corresponding to calibration data, quantization algorithm, and quantization schemes are derived. Finally, a best practice of LLM PTQ pipeline is constructed. All the benchmark results and the toolkit can be found at https://github.com/ModelTC/llmc.
5/13/2024
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Quantization Strategies for Large Language Models
Renren Jin, Jiangcun Du, Wuwei Huang, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, Deyi Xiong
0
0
Increasing the number of parameters in large language models (LLMs) usually improves performance in downstream tasks but raises compute and memory costs, making deployment difficult in resource-limited settings. Quantization techniques, which reduce the bits needed for model weights or activations with minimal performance loss, have become popular due to the rise of LLMs. However, most quantization studies use pre-trained LLMs, and the impact of quantization on instruction-tuned LLMs and the relationship between perplexity and benchmark performance of quantized LLMs are not well understood. Evaluation of quantized LLMs is often limited to language modeling and a few classification tasks, leaving their performance on other benchmarks unclear. To address these gaps, we propose a structured evaluation framework consisting of three critical dimensions: (1) knowledge & capacity, (2) alignment, and (3) efficiency, and conduct extensive experiments across ten diverse benchmarks. Our experimental results indicate that LLMs with 4-bit quantization can retain performance comparable to their non-quantized counterparts, and perplexity can serve as a proxy metric for quantized LLMs on most benchmarks. Furthermore, quantized LLMs with larger parameter scales can outperform smaller LLMs. Despite the memory savings achieved through quantization, it can also slow down the inference speed of LLMs. Consequently, substantial engineering efforts and hardware support are imperative to achieve a balanced optimization of decoding speed and memory consumption in the context of quantized LLMs.
6/7/2024
💬
Evaluating Quantized Large Language Models
Shiyao Li, Xuefei Ning, Luning Wang, Tengxuan Liu, Xiangsheng Shi, Shengen Yan, Guohao Dai, Huazhong Yang, Yu Wang
0
0
Post-training quantization (PTQ) has emerged as a promising technique to reduce the cost of large language models (LLMs). Specifically, PTQ can effectively mitigate memory consumption and reduce computational overhead in LLMs. To meet the requirements of both high efficiency and performance across diverse scenarios, a comprehensive evaluation of quantized LLMs is essential to guide the selection of quantization methods. This paper presents a thorough evaluation of these factors by evaluating the effect of PTQ on Weight, Activation, and KV Cache on 11 model families, including OPT, LLaMA2, Falcon, Bloomz, Mistral, ChatGLM, Vicuna, LongChat, StableLM, Gemma, and Mamba, with parameters ranging from 125M to 180B. The evaluation encompasses five types of tasks: basic NLP, emergent ability, trustworthiness, dialogue, and long-context tasks. Moreover, we also evaluate the state-of-the-art (SOTA) quantization methods to demonstrate their applicability. Based on the extensive experiments, we systematically summarize the effect of quantization, provide recommendations to apply quantization techniques, and point out future directions. The code can be found in https://github.com/thu-nics/qllm-eval.
6/7/2024
⛏️
Evaluating LLMs at Evaluating Temporal Generalization
Chenghao Zhu, Nuo Chen, Yufei Gao, Benyou Wang
0
0
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) highlights the urgent need for evolving evaluation methodologies that keep pace with improvements in language comprehension and information processing. However, traditional benchmarks, which are often static, fail to capture the continually changing information landscape, leading to a disparity between the perceived and actual effectiveness of LLMs in ever-changing real-world scenarios. Furthermore, these benchmarks do not adequately measure the models' capabilities over a broader temporal range or their adaptability over time. We examine current LLMs in terms of temporal generalization and bias, revealing that various temporal biases emerge in both language likelihood and prognostic prediction. This serves as a caution for LLM practitioners to pay closer attention to mitigating temporal biases. Also, we propose an evaluation framework Freshbench for dynamically generating benchmarks from the most recent real-world prognostication prediction. Our code is available at https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/FreshBench. The dataset will be released soon.
5/15/2024