Evaluating Large Language Models in Process Mining: Capabilities, Benchmarks, and Evaluation Strategies

Read original: arXiv:2403.06749 - Published 4/3/2024 by Alessandro Berti, Humam Kourani, Hannes Hafke, Chiao-Yun Li, Daniel Schuster
Total Score

0

Evaluating Large Language Models in Process Mining: Capabilities, Benchmarks, and Evaluation Strategies

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper evaluates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in the context of process mining, a field that analyzes business processes from data.
  • It examines different benchmarking strategies and evaluation approaches for assessing LLM performance in process mining tasks.
  • The paper also identifies future challenges and opportunities for applying LLMs to process mining.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how well large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text - can be used for process mining. Process mining is the analysis of business processes based on data about how those processes are carried out.

The researchers wanted to understand the capabilities of LLMs in this domain. They explored different ways to benchmark and evaluate the performance of LLMs on various process mining tasks, like extracting information from event logs or generating process models.

The key idea is that LLMs, with their advanced natural language understanding, could potentially be very useful for automating and improving process mining. However, the researchers also identified some challenges and limitations that need to be addressed for LLMs to be fully effective in this area.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides background on process mining and the potential applications of large language models (LLMs) in this field. It then outlines several benchmarking strategies and evaluation approaches the researchers used to assess LLM capabilities.

The benchmarking involved testing LLMs on a range of process mining tasks, such as extracting process-related information from textual data, generating process models from event logs, and predicting future process outcomes. The researchers developed specialized datasets and evaluation metrics to rigorously assess LLM performance.

Through their experiments, the paper identifies the strengths and limitations of current LLMs for process mining. It finds that LLMs show promising capabilities in areas like process discovery and conformance checking, but struggle with more complex tasks like process variant analysis and predictive monitoring.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges several key limitations and challenges in applying LLMs to process mining. For example, the lack of process mining-specific training data and the brittleness of LLMs to domain shifts were identified as areas needing further research.

Additionally, the paper notes that the current evaluation approaches may not fully capture the nuances of LLM performance in real-world process mining scenarios. Developing more comprehensive and realistic benchmark suites is an important area for future work.

While the paper provides a valuable initial exploration of LLM capabilities in process mining, there are still many open questions about how to best leverage these powerful language models in this domain. Ongoing research and experimentation will be crucial to further advance the state of the art.

Conclusion

This paper makes an important contribution by systematically evaluating the potential of large language models (LLMs) for process mining. The findings suggest that LLMs show promise in certain areas but also have significant limitations that need to be addressed.

The detailed benchmarking and evaluation strategies outlined in the paper provide a valuable foundation for future research in this area. Overcoming the identified challenges and further developing LLM capabilities could ultimately lead to more efficient and effective process mining solutions.

Overall, this work highlights both the opportunities and the complexities involved in applying advanced language models to the domain of process mining. It sets the stage for continued exploration and innovation at the intersection of these two rapidly evolving fields.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Evaluating Large Language Models in Process Mining: Capabilities, Benchmarks, and Evaluation Strategies
Total Score

0

Evaluating Large Language Models in Process Mining: Capabilities, Benchmarks, and Evaluation Strategies

Alessandro Berti, Humam Kourani, Hannes Hafke, Chiao-Yun Li, Daniel Schuster

Using Large Language Models (LLMs) for Process Mining (PM) tasks is becoming increasingly essential, and initial approaches yield promising results. However, little attention has been given to developing strategies for evaluating and benchmarking the utility of incorporating LLMs into PM tasks. This paper reviews the current implementations of LLMs in PM and reflects on three different questions. 1) What is the minimal set of capabilities required for PM on LLMs? 2) Which benchmark strategies help choose optimal LLMs for PM? 3) How do we evaluate the output of LLMs on specific PM tasks? The answer to these questions is fundamental to the development of comprehensive process mining benchmarks on LLMs covering different tasks and implementation paradigms.

Read more

4/3/2024

💬

Total Score

0

PM-LLM-Benchmark: Evaluating Large Language Models on Process Mining Tasks

Alessandro Berti, Humam Kourani, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to semi-automate some process mining (PM) analyses. While commercial models are already adequate for many analytics tasks, the competitive level of open-source LLMs in PM tasks is unknown. In this paper, we propose PM-LLM-Benchmark, the first comprehensive benchmark for PM focusing on domain knowledge (process-mining-specific and process-specific) and on different implementation strategies. We focus also on the challenges in creating such a benchmark, related to the public availability of the data and on evaluation biases by the LLMs. Overall, we observe that most of the considered LLMs can perform some process mining tasks at a satisfactory level, but tiny models that would run on edge devices are still inadequate. We also conclude that while the proposed benchmark is useful for identifying LLMs that are adequate for process mining tasks, further research is needed to overcome the evaluation biases and perform a more thorough ranking of the competitive LLMs.

Read more

7/19/2024

Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhanced Process Model Comprehension
Total Score

0

Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhanced Process Model Comprehension

Humam Kourani, Alessandro Berti, Jasmin Henrich, Wolfgang Kratsch, Robin Weidlich, Chiao-Yun Li, Ahmad Arslan, Daniel Schuster, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

In Business Process Management (BPM), effectively comprehending process models is crucial yet poses significant challenges, particularly as organizations scale and processes become more complex. This paper introduces a novel framework utilizing the advanced capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance the interpretability of complex process models. We present different methods for abstracting business process models into a format accessible to LLMs, and we implement advanced prompting strategies specifically designed to optimize LLM performance within our framework. Additionally, we present a tool, AIPA, that implements our proposed framework and allows for conversational process querying. We evaluate our framework and tool by i) an automatic evaluation comparing different LLMs, model abstractions, and prompting strategies and ii) a user study designed to assess AIPA's effectiveness comprehensively. Results demonstrate our framework's ability to improve the accessibility and interpretability of process models, pioneering new pathways for integrating AI technologies into the BPM field.

Read more

8/22/2024

Beyond Metrics: A Critical Analysis of the Variability in Large Language Model Evaluation Frameworks
Total Score

0

Beyond Metrics: A Critical Analysis of the Variability in Large Language Model Evaluation Frameworks

Marco AF Pimentel, Cl'ement Christophe, Tathagata Raha, Prateek Munjal, Praveen K Kanithi, Shadab Khan

As large language models (LLMs) continue to evolve, the need for robust and standardized evaluation benchmarks becomes paramount. Evaluating the performance of these models is a complex challenge that requires careful consideration of various linguistic tasks, model architectures, and benchmarking methodologies. In recent years, various frameworks have emerged as noteworthy contributions to the field, offering comprehensive evaluation tests and benchmarks for assessing the capabilities of LLMs across diverse domains. This paper provides an exploration and critical analysis of some of these evaluation methodologies, shedding light on their strengths, limitations, and impact on advancing the state-of-the-art in natural language processing.

Read more

8/1/2024