Evaluating the Stability of Deep Learning Latent Feature Spaces

Read original: arXiv:2402.11404 - Published 8/22/2024 by Ademide O. Mabadeje, Michael J. Pyrcz

🤿

Overview

High-dimensional datasets present significant challenges in statistical modeling across various fields.
Deep learning approaches can distill essential features from complex data, enabling modeling, visualization, and compression through reduced dimensionality latent feature spaces.
This study introduces a novel workflow to evaluate the stability of these latent spaces, ensuring consistency and reliability in subsequent analyses.

Plain English Explanation

Deep learning models are often used to analyze complex, high-dimensional datasets, such as those found in fields like bioinformatics and earth sciences. These models can uncover the underlying patterns and essential features in the data by projecting it into a lower-dimensional latent feature space. This reduction in dimensionality makes it easier to model, visualize, and compress the data.

However, the stability of these latent feature spaces is crucial, as it ensures the reliability and consistency of the subsequent analyses. Stability refers to the extent to which the latent spaces remain unchanged when faced with minor changes in the data, the model training process, or the model parameters.

This study introduces a comprehensive workflow to evaluate the stability of latent feature spaces, considering three different types of stability: sample, structural, and inferential. The researchers use a variety of metrics, such as k-means clustering, modified Jonker-Volgenant algorithm, anisotropy metrics, and convex hull analysis, to quantify and interpret the observed instabilities in the latent feature spaces.

Technical Explanation

The researchers implemented their proposed workflow across 500 autoencoder realizations and three datasets, including both synthetic and real-world scenarios. This allowed them to thoroughly investigate the dynamics of latent feature spaces.

The key elements of the workflow include:

Sample Stability: Evaluating the invariance of the latent spaces to minor perturbations in the input data.
Structural Stability: Assessing the consistency of the latent space structure, such as the preservation of class boundaries, across different training realizations.
Inferential Stability: Examining the robustness of downstream analyses and inferences drawn from the latent spaces.

The researchers employed k-means clustering and the modified Jonker-Volgenant algorithm for class alignment, alongside anisotropy metrics and convex hull analysis, to introduce novel stability indicators, such as adjusted stress and Jaccard dissimilarity.

The findings highlighted the inherent instabilities in latent feature spaces and demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed workflow in quantifying and interpreting these instabilities.

Critical Analysis

The study acknowledges the importance of stability in latent feature spaces, which is often overlooked in deep learning research. By introducing a comprehensive workflow to assess sample, structural, and inferential stability, the researchers provide a valuable tool for improving the interpretability and quality control of deep learning models.

However, the study does not address the potential causes of the observed instabilities, such as the model architecture, hyperparameter settings, or the characteristics of the input data. Further research could investigate the relationship between these factors and the stability of latent feature spaces.

Additionally, while the proposed metrics provide a quantitative assessment of stability, the interpretation of these metrics and their implications for downstream analyses could be further explored. Guidance on how to interpret the stability measures and their thresholds for acceptable levels of instability would be a valuable addition.

Conclusion

This study introduces a novel workflow to comprehensively evaluate the stability of latent feature spaces in deep learning models. By considering sample, structural, and inferential stability, the researchers shed light on the inherent instabilities in these latent spaces and provide a systematic approach to quantify and interpret them.

The findings of this work have important implications for the effective use of deep learning in a wide range of applications, from bioinformatics to earth sciences. By promoting improved model interpretability and quality control, this research can lead to more informed decision-making and more reliable analytical workflows that leverage the power of deep learning.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

Evaluating the Stability of Deep Learning Latent Feature Spaces

Ademide O. Mabadeje, Michael J. Pyrcz

High-dimensional datasets present substantial challenges in statistical modeling across various disciplines, necessitating effective dimensionality reduction methods. Deep learning approaches, notable for their capacity to distill essential features from complex data, facilitate modeling, visualization, and compression through reduced dimensionality latent feature spaces, have wide applications from bioinformatics to earth sciences. This study introduces a novel workflow to evaluate the stability of these latent spaces, ensuring consistency and reliability in subsequent analyses. Stability, defined as the invariance of latent spaces to minor data, training realizations, and parameter perturbations, is crucial yet often overlooked. Our proposed methodology delineates three stability types, sample, structural, and inferential, within latent spaces, and introduces a suite of metrics for comprehensive evaluation. We implement this workflow across 500 autoencoder realizations and three datasets, encompassing both synthetic and real-world scenarios to explain latent space dynamics. Employing k-means clustering and the modified Jonker-Volgenant algorithm for class alignment, alongside anisotropy metrics and convex hull analysis, we introduce adjusted stress and Jaccard dissimilarity as novel stability indicators. Our findings highlight inherent instabilities in latent feature spaces and demonstrate the workflow's efficacy in quantifying and interpreting these instabilities. This work advances the understanding of latent feature spaces, promoting improved model interpretability and quality control for more informed decision-making for diverse analytical workflows that leverage deep learning.

8/22/2024

Assessing Sample Quality via the Latent Space of Generative Models

Jingyi Xu, Hieu Le, Dimitris Samaras

Advances in generative models increase the need for sample quality assessment. To do so, previous methods rely on a pre-trained feature extractor to embed the generated samples and real samples into a common space for comparison. However, different feature extractors might lead to inconsistent assessment outcomes. Moreover, these methods are not applicable for domains where a robust, universal feature extractor does not yet exist, such as medical images or 3D assets. In this paper, we propose to directly examine the latent space of the trained generative model to infer generated sample quality. This is feasible because the quality a generated sample directly relates to the amount of training data resembling it, and we can infer this information by examining the density of the latent space. Accordingly, we use a latent density score function to quantify sample quality. We show that the proposed score correlates highly with the sample quality for various generative models including VAEs, GANs and Latent Diffusion Models. Compared with previous quality assessment methods, our method has the following advantages: 1) pre-generation quality estimation with reduced computational cost, 2) generalizability to various domains and modalities, and 3) applicability to latent-based image editing and generation methods. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed methods can benefit downstream tasks such as few-shot image classification and latent face image editing. Code is available at https://github.com/cvlab-stonybrook/LS-sample-quality.

7/23/2024

Linking Robustness and Generalization: A k* Distribution Analysis of Concept Clustering in Latent Space for Vision Models

Shashank Kotyan, Pin-Yu Chen, Danilo Vasconcellos Vargas

Most evaluations of vision models use indirect methods to assess latent space quality. These methods often involve adding extra layers to project the latent space into a new one. This projection makes it difficult to analyze and compare the original latent space. This article uses the k* Distribution, a local neighborhood analysis method, to examine the learned latent space at the level of individual concepts, which can be extended to examine the entire latent space. We introduce skewness-based true and approximate metrics for interpreting individual concepts to assess the overall quality of vision models' latent space. Our findings indicate that current vision models frequently fracture the distributions of individual concepts within the latent space. Nevertheless, as these models improve in generalization across multiple datasets, the degree of fracturing diminishes. A similar trend is observed in robust vision models, where increased robustness correlates with reduced fracturing. Ultimately, this approach enables a direct interpretation and comparison of the latent spaces of different vision models and reveals a relationship between a model's generalizability and robustness. Results show that as a model becomes more general and robust, it tends to learn features that result in better clustering of concepts. Project Website is available online at https://shashankkotyan.github.io/k-Distribution/

8/20/2024

A Large-Scale Sensitivity Analysis on Latent Embeddings and Dimensionality Reductions for Text Spatializations

Daniel Atzberger, Tim Cech, Willy Scheibel, Jurgen Dollner, Michael Behrisch, Tobias Schreck

The semantic similarity between documents of a text corpus can be visualized using map-like metaphors based on two-dimensional scatterplot layouts. These layouts result from a dimensionality reduction on the document-term matrix or a representation within a latent embedding, including topic models. Thereby, the resulting layout depends on the input data and hyperparameters of the dimensionality reduction and is therefore affected by changes in them. Furthermore, the resulting layout is affected by changes in the input data and hyperparameters of the dimensionality reduction. However, such changes to the layout require additional cognitive efforts from the user. In this work, we present a sensitivity study that analyzes the stability of these layouts concerning (1) changes in the text corpora, (2) changes in the hyperparameter, and (3) randomness in the initialization. Our approach has two stages: data measurement and data analysis. First, we derived layouts for the combination of three text corpora and six text embeddings and a grid-search-inspired hyperparameter selection of the dimensionality reductions. Afterward, we quantified the similarity of the layouts through ten metrics, concerning local and global structures and class separation. Second, we analyzed the resulting 42817 tabular data points in a descriptive statistical analysis. From this, we derived guidelines for informed decisions on the layout algorithm and highlight specific hyperparameter settings. We provide our implementation as a Git repository at https://github.com/hpicgs/Topic-Models-and-Dimensionality-Reduction-Sensitivity-Study and results as Zenodo archive at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12772898.

7/26/2024