Event-based Optical Flow on Neuromorphic Processor: ANN vs. SNN Comparison based on Activation Sparsification
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Event-based optical flow on neuromorphic processors
- Comparing the performance of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) for event-based optical flow
- Analyzing the impact of activation sparsification on the performance of ANNs and SNNs
Plain English Explanation
This paper compares how well two different types of neural networks, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), can perform event-based optical flow on specialized neuromorphic hardware. Event-based optical flow is a technique for tracking movement in a scene using sensors that only detect changes in the image, rather than capturing full frames.
The researchers looked at how "sparse" the activations (or signals) were in each type of network - in other words, how many of the neurons were firing at any given time. They found that by making the activations more sparse, they could improve the performance of both ANNs and SNNs on the optical flow task when running on neuromorphic hardware. Neuromorphic hardware is specialized computer chips designed to mimic the brain's efficient use of power.
The key insight is that sparse activations align well with the event-based, low-power nature of neuromorphic processors. This allows the networks to run more efficiently on the specialized hardware, potentially enabling new applications for event-based vision and motion tracking.
Technical Explanation
The paper evaluates the performance of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) for event-based optical flow on a neuromorphic processor. They use activation sparsification, a technique that reduces the number of neurons firing at any given time, to improve the efficiency of both network types.
The researchers developed an event-based optical flow dataset and used it to train and evaluate ANN and SNN models. They then analyzed the impact of activation sparsification on the performance of these models when running on a neuromorphic processor.
The results show that activation sparsification can significantly improve the performance of both ANN and SNN models on the event-based optical flow task. By reducing the number of active neurons, the models were able to run more efficiently on the neuromorphic hardware, with SNNs showing a particular advantage due to their inherent sparsity.
The authors also provide insights into the tradeoffs between ANN and SNN performance, as well as the potential for event-based optical flow and sparse neural networks to enable new applications on low-power, neuromorphic platforms.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough comparison of ANN and SNN approaches for event-based optical flow, and the insights around activation sparsification are valuable. However, the authors acknowledge that their evaluation is limited to a single neuromorphic processor and a specific event-based optical flow dataset.
Further research would be needed to understand how these findings generalize to other neuromorphic hardware platforms and event-based vision tasks. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the practical challenges of deploying sparse neural networks in real-world scenarios, such as the difficulty of training sparse models or the potential for loss of accuracy.
It would also be interesting to see the authors explore the energy efficiency and latency benefits of the sparse ANN and SNN models more deeply, as these factors are crucial for practical deployment on low-power neuromorphic hardware.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important comparison of ANN and SNN approaches for event-based optical flow on neuromorphic processors, highlighting the potential of activation sparsification to improve the efficiency of both network types. The insights around the alignment between sparse neural networks and the event-based, low-power nature of neuromorphic hardware could have significant implications for the development of energy-efficient, real-time vision and motion tracking applications on specialized neuromorphic platforms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Event-based Optical Flow on Neuromorphic Processor: ANN vs. SNN Comparison based on Activation Sparsification
Yingfu Xu, Guangzhi Tang, Amirreza Yousefzadeh, Guido de Croon, Manolis Sifalakis
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) for event-based optical flow are claimed to be computationally more efficient than their artificial neural networks (ANNs) counterparts, but a fair comparison is missing in the literature. In this work, we propose an event-based optical flow solution based on activation sparsification and a neuromorphic processor, SENECA. SENECA has an event-driven processing mechanism that can exploit the sparsity in ANN activations and SNN spikes to accelerate the inference of both types of neural networks. The ANN and the SNN for comparison have similar low activation/spike density (~5%) thanks to our novel sparsification-aware training. In the hardware-in-loop experiments designed to deduce the average time and energy consumption, the SNN consumes 44.9ms and 927.0 microjoules, which are 62.5% and 75.2% of the ANN's consumption, respectively. We find that SNN's higher efficiency attributes to its lower pixel-wise spike density (43.5% vs. 66.5%) that requires fewer memory access operations for neuron states.
Read more7/31/2024
0
SDformerFlow: Spatiotemporal swin spikeformer for event-based optical flow estimation
Yi Tian, Juan Andrade-Cetto
Event cameras generate asynchronous and sparse event streams capturing changes in light intensity. They offer significant advantages over conventional frame-based cameras, such as a higher dynamic range and an extremely faster data rate, making them particularly useful in scenarios involving fast motion or challenging lighting conditions. Spiking neural networks (SNNs) share similar asynchronous and sparse characteristics and are well-suited for processing data from event cameras. Inspired by the potential of transformers and spike-driven transformers (spikeformers) in other computer vision tasks, we propose two solutions for fast and robust optical flow estimation for event cameras: STTFlowNet and SDformerFlow. STTFlowNet adopts a U-shaped artificial neural network (ANN) architecture with spatiotemporal shifted window self-attention (swin) transformer encoders, while SDformerFlow presents its fully spiking counterpart, incorporating swin spikeformer encoders. Furthermore, we present two variants of the spiking version with different neuron models. Our work is the first to make use of spikeformers for dense optical flow estimation. We conduct end-to-end training for all models using supervised learning. Our results yield state-of-the-art performance among SNN-based event optical flow methods on both the DSEC and MVSEC datasets, and show significant reduction in power consumption compared to the equivalent ANNs.
Read more9/9/2024
0
New!Reconsidering the energy efficiency of spiking neural networks
Zhanglu Yan, Zhenyu Bai, Weng-Fai Wong
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are generally regarded as more energy-efficient because they do not use multiplications. However, most SNN works only consider the counting of additions to evaluate energy consumption, neglecting other overheads such as memory accesses and data movement operations. This oversight can lead to a misleading perception of efficiency, especially when state-of-the-art SNN accelerators operate with very small time window sizes. In this paper, we present a detailed comparison of the energy consumption of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and SNNs from a hardware perspective. We provide accurate formulas for energy consumption based on classical multi-level memory hierarchy architectures, commonly used neuromorphic dataflow architectures, and our proposed improved spatial-dataflow architecture. Our research demonstrates that to achieve comparable accuracy and greater energy efficiency than ANNs, SNNs require strict limitations on both time window size T and sparsity s. For instance, with the VGG16 model and a fixed T of 6, the neuron sparsity rate must exceed 93% to ensure energy efficiency across most architectures. Inspired by our findings, we explore strategies to enhance energy efficiency by increasing sparsity. We introduce two regularization terms during training that constrain weights and activations, effectively boosting the sparsity rate. Our experiments on the CIFAR-10 dataset, using T of 6, show that our SNNs consume 69% of the energy used by optimized ANNs on spatial-dataflow architectures, while maintaining an SNN accuracy of 94.18%. This framework, developed using PyTorch, is publicly available for use and further research.
Read more9/16/2024
🤿
0
A Hybrid ANN-SNN Architecture for Low-Power and Low-Latency Visual Perception
Asude Aydin, Mathias Gehrig, Daniel Gehrig, Davide Scaramuzza
Spiking Neural Networks (SNN) are a class of bio-inspired neural networks that promise to bring low-power and low-latency inference to edge devices through asynchronous and sparse processing. However, being temporal models, SNNs depend heavily on expressive states to generate predictions on par with classical artificial neural networks (ANNs). These states converge only after long transient periods, and quickly decay without input data, leading to higher latency, power consumption, and lower accuracy. This work addresses this issue by initializing the state with an auxiliary ANN running at a low rate. The SNN then uses the state to generate predictions with high temporal resolution until the next initialization phase. Our hybrid ANN-SNN model thus combines the best of both worlds: It does not suffer from long state transients and state decay thanks to the ANN, and can generate predictions with high temporal resolution, low latency, and low power thanks to the SNN. We show for the task of event-based 2D and 3D human pose estimation that our method consumes 88% less power with only a 4% decrease in performance compared to its fully ANN counterparts when run at the same inference rate. Moreover, when compared to SNNs, our method achieves a 74% lower error. This research thus provides a new understanding of how ANNs and SNNs can be used to maximize their respective benefits.
Read more4/19/2024