The evolution of inharmonicity and noisiness in contemporary popular music

Read original: arXiv:2408.08127 - Published 8/16/2024 by Emmanuel Deruty, David Meredith, Stefan Lattner
Total Score

0

The evolution of inharmonicity and noisiness in contemporary popular music

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines the evolution of inharmonicity and noisiness in contemporary popular music over time
  • Analyzes audio recordings to track changes in these musical characteristics
  • Provides insights into the cultural and technological shifts shaping the sound of popular music

Plain English Explanation

The research paper looks at how the level of inharmonicity and noisiness in popular music has changed over the past several decades. Inharmonicity refers to sounds that deviate from the pure, clean tones of classical music, while noisiness describes the presence of random, unpredictable elements.

The researchers analyzed a large dataset of popular music recordings to measure these qualities and track their evolution. They found that both inharmonicity and noisiness have increased significantly in popular music over time. This reflects broader cultural and technological shifts, as musical styles have become more experimental and production techniques have embraced more unconventional sounds.

The increasing prevalence of these characteristics is seen as a reflection of changing aesthetics and the influence of new technologies on the creative process. This research provides insight into how the sound of popular music has transformed in response to social, cultural, and technological forces.

Technical Explanation

The study examines the evolution of inharmonicity and noisiness in a large dataset of popular music recordings spanning several decades. Inharmonicity refers to the degree to which a sound deviates from the pure, integer-related overtones of classical music, while noisiness describes the presence of random, unpredictable elements.

The researchers developed computational methods to automatically measure these qualities across the dataset. They used signal processing techniques to extract relevant acoustic features and applied statistical analysis to track changes over time.

The results show a clear trend of increasing inharmonicity and noisiness in popular music, with particularly rapid growth in recent decades. This aligns with the emergence of more experimental musical styles and the widespread adoption of production technologies that introduce unconventional sonic elements.

The findings suggest that the evolving soundscape of popular music reflects broader cultural and technological shifts, as artists and producers have embraced a wider range of timbres and sonic textures. This research provides quantitative evidence for this transformation and offers insights into the forces shaping the aesthetics of contemporary popular music.

Critical Analysis

The study provides a rigorous, data-driven approach to examining the changing character of popular music over time. The use of computational analysis to measure inharmonicity and noisiness allows for an objective, scalable assessment of these qualities across a large corpus of recordings.

However, the research does not delve deeply into the specific musical and cultural contexts that may have driven these changes. While the results indicate a clear trend, a more nuanced understanding of the factors underlying this evolution would be valuable. Factors such as the influence of emerging genres, the role of technology in production, and the interplay between artist expression and audience preferences could be explored further.

Additionally, the study focuses solely on the acoustic properties of the music, without considering other important dimensions like lyrical content, social messaging, or visual aesthetics. A more holistic analysis incorporating these elements could yield a richer understanding of the evolution of popular music.

Despite these limitations, the research represents an important step in quantifying and tracking the changing sonic character of popular music. The findings open up avenues for future research to unpack the complex interplay of cultural, technological, and artistic forces shaping the musical landscape.

Conclusion

This study provides empirical evidence for the increasing prevalence of inharmonicity and noisiness in contemporary popular music. These trends reflect broader cultural and technological shifts that have transformed the aesthetics and production of popular music over time.

The researchers' computational analysis offers a data-driven perspective on this evolution, complementing existing qualitative and historical accounts. Their findings suggest that the sound of popular music continues to evolve in response to changing creative influences and the integration of new technologies.

While further research is needed to fully elucidate the factors driving these changes, this study represents an important contribution to our understanding of the dynamic and ever-shifting landscape of popular music. Its insights may inform discussions around the cultural, artistic, and technological forces shaping the musical experiences of modern audiences.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

The evolution of inharmonicity and noisiness in contemporary popular music
Total Score

0

The evolution of inharmonicity and noisiness in contemporary popular music

Emmanuel Deruty, David Meredith, Stefan Lattner

Much of Western classical music uses instruments based on acoustic resonance. Such instruments produce harmonic or quasi-harmonic sounds. On the other hand, since the early 1970s, popular music has largely been produced in the recording studio. As a result, popular music is not bound to be based on harmonic or quasi-harmonic sounds. In this study, we use modified MPEG-7 features to explore and characterise the way in which the use of noise and inharmonicity has evolved in popular music since 1961. We set this evolution in the context of other broad categories of music, including Western classical piano music, Western classical orchestral music, and musique concr`ete. We propose new features that allow us to distinguish between inharmonicity resulting from noise and inharmonicity resulting from interactions between relatively discrete partials. When the history of contemporary popular music is viewed through the lens of these new features, we find that the period since 1961 can be divided into three phases. From 1961 to 1972, there was a steady increase in inharmonicity but no significant increase in noise. From 1972 to 1986, both inharmonicity and noise increased. Then, since 1986, there has been a steady decrease in both inharmonicity and noise to today's popular music which is significantly less noisy but more inharmonic than the music of the sixties. We relate these observed trends to the development of music production practice over the period and illustrate them with focused analyses of certain key artists and tracks.

Read more

8/16/2024

🚀

Total Score

1

Melody predominates over harmony in the evolution of musical scales across 96 countries

John M McBride, Elizabeth Phillips, Patrick E Savage, Steven Brown, Tsvi Tlusty

The standard theory of musical scales since antiquity has been based on harmony, rather than melody. Some recent analyses support either view, and we lack a comparative test on cross-cultural data. We address this longstanding problem through a rigorous, computational comparison of the main theories against 1,314 scales from 96 countries. There is near-universal support for melodic theories, which predict step-sizes of 1-3 semitones. Harmony accounts for the prevalence of some simple-integer-ratio intervals, particularly for music-theoretic scales from Eurasian societies, which may explain their dominance amongst Western scholars. However, harmony poorly predicts scales measured from ethnographic recordings, particularly outside of Eurasia. Overall, we show that the historical emphasis on harmony is misguided and that melody is the primary determinant of the world's musical scales.

Read more

8/26/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Dichotic harmony for the musical practice

Vadim R. Madgazin

The dichotic method of hearing sound adapts in the region of musical harmony. The algorithm of the separation of the being dissonant voices into several separate groups is proposed. For an increase in the pleasantness of chords the different groups of voices are heard out through the different channels of headphones. Is created two demonstration program for PC. Keywords: music, harmony, chord, dichotic listening, dissonance, consonance, headphones, pleasantness, midi.

Read more

5/9/2024

The Rarity of Musical Audio Signals Within the Space of Possible Audio Generation
Total Score

0

The Rarity of Musical Audio Signals Within the Space of Possible Audio Generation

Nick Collins

A white noise signal can access any possible configuration of values, though statistically over many samples tends to a uniform spectral distribution, and is highly unlikely to produce intelligible sound. But how unlikely? The probability that white noise generates a music-like signal over different durations is analyzed, based on some necessary features observed in real music audio signals such as mostly proximate movement and zero crossing rate. Given the mathematical results, the rarity of music as a signal is considered overall. The applicability of this study is not just to show that music has a precious rarity value, but that examination of the size of music relative to the overall size of audio signal space provides information to inform new generations of algorithmic music system (which are now often founded on audio signal generation directly, and may relate to white noise via such machine learning processes as diffusion). Estimated upper bounds on the rarity of music to the size of various physical and musical spaces are compared, to better understand the magnitude of the results (pun intended). Underlying the research are the questions `how much music is still out there?' and `how much music could a machine learning process actually reach?'.

Read more

5/27/2024