Evolving Self-Assembling Neural Networks: From Spontaneous Activity to Experience-Dependent Learning
2406.09787
0
0
Abstract
Biological neural networks are characterized by their high degree of plasticity, a core property that enables the remarkable adaptability of natural organisms. Importantly, this ability affects both the synaptic strength and the topology of the nervous systems. Artificial neural networks, on the other hand, have been mainly designed as static, fully connected structures that can be notoriously brittle in the face of changing environments and novel inputs. Building on previous works on Neural Developmental Programs (NDPs), we propose a class of self-organizing neural networks capable of synaptic and structural plasticity in an activity and reward-dependent manner which we call Lifelong Neural Developmental Program (LNDP). We present an instance of such a network built on the graph transformer architecture and propose a mechanism for pre-experience plasticity based on the spontaneous activity of sensory neurons. Our results demonstrate the ability of the model to learn from experiences in different control tasks starting from randomly connected or empty networks. We further show that structural plasticity is advantageous in environments necessitating fast adaptation or with non-stationary rewards.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the evolution of self-assembling neural networks, examining how they can develop from spontaneous activity to experience-dependent learning.
- The research investigates the mechanisms by which neural networks can organically grow and adapt, drawing inspiration from biological processes.
- Key aspects include the role of neuronal control, Hebbian synaptic plasticity, and the evolution of structural flexibility in neural network architectures.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a fascinating approach to developing artificial neural networks that can grow and evolve on their own, much like the human brain. Rather than designing a fixed neural network architecture, the researchers have developed techniques that allow the networks to self-assemble and adapt over time based on the data and experiences they encounter.
This is inspired by the way biological neural networks in the brain develop. As we learn and interact with the world, the connections between neurons in our brains are continuously strengthened or weakened through a process called Hebbian synaptic plasticity. The neural networks described in this paper aim to mimic this, allowing them to evolve structural flexibility and grow new connections in response to their experiences.
This could lead to more adaptable and intelligent artificial systems that can learn and develop in open-ended ways, rather than being limited to fixed architectures. The researchers also explore how these self-assembling networks can exhibit spontaneous activity and learn from it, similar to how our brains form initial neural connections even before we're born.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach to evolving self-assembling neural networks that can develop from spontaneous activity to experience-dependent learning. The researchers draw inspiration from biological neural networks and processes like Hebbian synaptic plasticity to create artificial networks with the capacity for structural flexibility and growth.
Key aspects of the research include:
- Mechanisms for the self-assembly of neural networks based on spontaneous activity and experience-dependent learning.
- The role of neuronal control in guiding the growth and adaptation of the neural networks.
- The use of Hebbian synaptic plasticity to facilitate the strengthening and weakening of connections between neurons over time.
- The development of structurally flexible neural network architectures that can evolve and adapt based on their experiences.
These techniques aim to create more adaptable and intelligent artificial systems that can learn and develop in open-ended ways, much like biological neural networks in the brain.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling and innovative approach to developing self-assembling neural networks, but it also raises some important questions and limitations that merit further exploration.
One potential concern is the computational complexity and scalability of the proposed mechanisms. As the neural networks grow and adapt, the number of connections and the overall system complexity could increase exponentially, potentially leading to challenges in training and deployment. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to optimize the efficiency and practicality of these self-assembling architectures.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the mechanisms of self-assembly and growth, but it does not delve deeply into the specific types of tasks or applications that these self-assembling networks might excel at. It would be valuable to see more real-world experiments and use cases to better understand the practical implications and potential limitations of this approach.
Another area for further investigation is the role of neuronal control and the extent to which it can be scaled and generalized. The researchers propose specific mechanisms for neuronal control, but it's unclear how these might translate to more complex, multi-layered neural networks or different problem domains.
Despite these potential challenges, the core ideas presented in the paper represent a significant step forward in the field of evolving and adaptable artificial neural networks. The researchers have successfully demonstrated the feasibility of self-assembling networks that can learn from spontaneous activity and experience, which could pave the way for more biologically-inspired and structurally flexible approaches to artificial intelligence.
Conclusion
This paper explores a novel approach to developing self-assembling neural networks that can grow and adapt over time, drawing inspiration from the way biological neural networks in the brain develop. By incorporating mechanisms like Hebbian synaptic plasticity and neuronal control, the researchers have demonstrated the potential for structurally flexible neural network architectures that can evolve and learn in open-ended ways.
While there are still challenges to be addressed, such as scalability and practical applications, this research represents an important step towards more adaptable and intelligent artificial systems that can learn and develop in a manner akin to biological neural networks. By continuing to explore these biologically-inspired approaches to artificial intelligence, researchers may unlock new avenues for creating flexible, responsive, and highly capable AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
Growing Artificial Neural Networks for Control: the Role of Neuronal Diversity
Eleni Nisioti, Erwan Plantec, Milton Montero, Joachim Winther Pedersen, Sebastian Risi
0
0
In biological evolution complex neural structures grow from a handful of cellular ingredients. As genomes in nature are bounded in size, this complexity is achieved by a growth process where cells communicate locally to decide whether to differentiate, proliferate and connect with other cells. This self-organisation is hypothesized to play an important part in the generalisation, and robustness of biological neural networks. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), on the other hand, are traditionally optimized in the space of weights. Thus, the benefits and challenges of growing artificial neural networks remain understudied. Building on the previously introduced Neural Developmental Programs (NDP), in this work we present an algorithm for growing ANNs that solve reinforcement learning tasks. We identify a key challenge: ensuring phenotypic complexity requires maintaining neuronal diversity, but this diversity comes at the cost of optimization stability. To address this, we introduce two mechanisms: (a) equipping neurons with an intrinsic state inherited upon neurogenesis; (b) lateral inhibition, a mechanism inspired by biological growth, which controlls the pace of growth, helping diversity persist. We show that both mechanisms contribute to neuronal diversity and that, equipped with them, NDPs achieve comparable results to existing direct and developmental encodings in complex locomotion tasks
5/15/2024
🤷
Unsupervised representation learning with Hebbian synaptic and structural plasticity in brain-like feedforward neural networks
Naresh Ravichandran, Anders Lansner, Pawel Herman
0
0
Neural networks that can capture key principles underlying brain computation offer exciting new opportunities for developing artificial intelligence and brain-like computing algorithms. Such networks remain biologically plausible while leveraging localized forms of synaptic learning rules and modular network architecture found in the neocortex. Compared to backprop-driven deep learning approches, they provide more suitable models for deploying on neuromorphic hardware and have greater potential for scalability on large-scale computing clusters. The development of such brain-like neural networks depends on having a learning procedure that can build effective internal representations from data. In this work, we introduce and evaluate a brain-like neural network model capable of unsupervised representation learning. It builds on the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), which has earlier been implemented as abstract as well as biophyscially detailed recurrent attractor neural networks explaining various cortical associative memory phenomena. Here we developed a feedforward BCPNN model to perform representation learning by incorporating a range of brain-like attributes derived from neocortical circuits such as cortical columns, divisive normalization, Hebbian synaptic plasticity, structural plasticity, sparse activity, and sparse patchy connectivity. The model was tested on a diverse set of popular machine learning benchmarks: grayscale images (MNIST, Fashion-MNIST), RGB natural images (SVHN, CIFAR-10), QSAR (MUV, HIV), and malware detection (EMBER). The performance of the model when using a linear classifier to predict the class labels fared competitively with conventional multi-layer perceptrons and other state-of-the-art brain-like neural networks.
6/10/2024
🧠
Structurally Flexible Neural Networks: Evolving the Building Blocks for General Agents
Joachim Winther Pedersen, Erwan Plantec, Eleni Nisioti, Milton Montero, Sebastian Risi
0
0
Artificial neural networks used for reinforcement learning are structurally rigid, meaning that each optimized parameter of the network is tied to its specific placement in the network structure. It also means that a network only works with pre-defined and fixed input- and output sizes. This is a consequence of having the number of optimized parameters being directly dependent on the structure of the network. Structural rigidity limits the ability to optimize parameters of policies across multiple environments that do not share input and output spaces. Here, we evolve a set of neurons and plastic synapses each represented by a gated recurrent unit (GRU). During optimization, the parameters of these fundamental units of a neural network are optimized in different random structural configurations. Earlier work has shown that parameter sharing between units is important for making structurally flexible neurons We show that it is possible to optimize a set of distinct neuron- and synapse types allowing for a mitigation of the symmetry dilemma. We demonstrate this by optimizing a single set of neurons and synapses to solve multiple reinforcement learning control tasks simultaneously.
5/20/2024
Theories of synaptic memory consolidation and intelligent plasticity for continual learning
Friedemann Zenke, Axel Laborieux
0
0
Humans and animals learn throughout life. Such continual learning is crucial for intelligence. In this chapter, we examine the pivotal role plasticity mechanisms with complex internal synaptic dynamics could play in enabling this ability in neural networks. By surveying theoretical research, we highlight two fundamental enablers for continual learning. First, synaptic plasticity mechanisms must maintain and evolve an internal state over several behaviorally relevant timescales. Second, plasticity algorithms must leverage the internal state to intelligently regulate plasticity at individual synapses to facilitate the seamless integration of new memories while avoiding detrimental interference with existing ones. Our chapter covers successful applications of these principles to deep neural networks and underscores the significance of synaptic metaplasticity in sustaining continual learning capabilities. Finally, we outline avenues for further research to understand the brain's superb continual learning abilities and harness similar mechanisms for artificial intelligence systems.
5/28/2024