Growing Artificial Neural Networks for Control: the Role of Neuronal Diversity
2405.08510
0
0
🧠
Abstract
In biological evolution complex neural structures grow from a handful of cellular ingredients. As genomes in nature are bounded in size, this complexity is achieved by a growth process where cells communicate locally to decide whether to differentiate, proliferate and connect with other cells. This self-organisation is hypothesized to play an important part in the generalisation, and robustness of biological neural networks. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), on the other hand, are traditionally optimized in the space of weights. Thus, the benefits and challenges of growing artificial neural networks remain understudied. Building on the previously introduced Neural Developmental Programs (NDP), in this work we present an algorithm for growing ANNs that solve reinforcement learning tasks. We identify a key challenge: ensuring phenotypic complexity requires maintaining neuronal diversity, but this diversity comes at the cost of optimization stability. To address this, we introduce two mechanisms: (a) equipping neurons with an intrinsic state inherited upon neurogenesis; (b) lateral inhibition, a mechanism inspired by biological growth, which controlls the pace of growth, helping diversity persist. We show that both mechanisms contribute to neuronal diversity and that, equipped with them, NDPs achieve comparable results to existing direct and developmental encodings in complex locomotion tasks
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Biological neural networks self-organize through local cell communication, allowing for complexity and robustness, but artificial neural networks (ANNs) are traditionally optimized through weight adjustments.
- This paper presents an algorithm for growing ANNs to solve reinforcement learning tasks, addressing the challenge of maintaining neuronal diversity while ensuring optimization stability.
- Two key mechanisms are introduced: (a) equipping neurons with an intrinsic state inherited upon neurogenesis, and (b) lateral inhibition, a biologically-inspired growth control mechanism.
Plain English Explanation
In nature, complex neural structures like the human brain grow from a relatively small number of cellular ingredients, through a process of self-organization where cells communicate locally to decide whether to specialize, multiply, and connect with other cells. This self-organization is believed to be important for the generalization and robustness of biological neural networks.
Artificial neural networks, on the other hand, are traditionally optimized by adjusting the numerical weights of their connections. The benefits and challenges of growing artificial neural networks, rather than just optimizing their weights, have not been extensively studied.
Building on previous work on Neural Developmental Programs (NDPs), this paper presents an algorithm for growing ANNs that can solve reinforcement learning tasks. A key challenge identified is ensuring the complexity of the resulting networks while also maintaining the stability of the optimization process.
To address this, the authors introduce two key mechanisms:
- Intrinsic neuron state: Neurons are equipped with an internal state that is inherited when new neurons are generated, allowing for greater diversity.
- Lateral inhibition: A growth control mechanism inspired by biological processes, where neurons inhibit the growth of neighboring neurons, helping to maintain diversity.
The paper shows that these two mechanisms contribute to increased neuronal diversity, and that NDPs equipped with these mechanisms can achieve results comparable to existing methods for training ANNs, including direct and developmental encodings, on complex locomotion tasks.
Technical Explanation
The paper builds on the previously introduced concept of Neural Developmental Programs (NDPs), which aim to grow artificial neural networks in a manner inspired by biological neural development.
The authors identify a key challenge in this approach: ensuring the phenotypic complexity required for solving challenging tasks, which requires maintaining neuronal diversity, but this diversity comes at the cost of optimization stability. To address this, they introduce two key mechanisms:
-
Intrinsic neuron state: Neurons are equipped with an intrinsic state that is inherited upon neurogenesis (the generation of new neurons). This intrinsic state allows for greater diversity to emerge during the growth process, as new neurons can have different initial states.
-
Lateral inhibition: A growth control mechanism inspired by biological processes, where neurons inhibit the growth of neighboring neurons. This helps to control the pace of growth and maintain diversity, preventing a few dominant neuronal types from taking over the network.
The authors evaluate their approach on complex locomotion tasks, comparing the performance of NDPs equipped with these mechanisms to existing direct and developmental encoding methods. They find that the NDPs with intrinsic neuron state and lateral inhibition achieve comparable results to the other methods, demonstrating the potential of growing artificial neural networks in a more biologically-inspired way.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel approach to growing artificial neural networks that draws inspiration from the self-organizing principles observed in biological neural development. The introduction of intrinsic neuron state and lateral inhibition mechanisms are interesting attempts to address the challenge of maintaining neuronal diversity while ensuring optimization stability.
However, the paper does not provide a thorough analysis of the limitations or potential drawbacks of these mechanisms. For example, it is unclear how the specific implementation of the intrinsic neuron state and lateral inhibition affects the complexity and interpretability of the resulting neural networks.
Additionally, the paper only evaluates the performance of the NDPs on complex locomotion tasks, which may not fully capture the breadth of capabilities required for real-world applications. Further research is needed to understand how these growth mechanisms scale to more diverse and challenging problem domains.
[The authors also do not discuss the potential implications of their research on the broader understanding of dynamical stability and chaos in artificial neural network trajectories or the training dynamics of deep neural networks.]
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially valuable approach to growing artificial neural networks, but more work is needed to fully understand its limitations, potential applications, and broader implications for the field of artificial intelligence.
Conclusion
This paper explores a biologically-inspired approach to growing artificial neural networks, addressing the challenge of maintaining neuronal diversity while ensuring optimization stability. By introducing mechanisms like intrinsic neuron state and lateral inhibition, the authors demonstrate that it is possible to grow ANNs capable of solving complex reinforcement learning tasks, with performance comparable to existing direct and developmental encoding methods.
While further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and broader implications of this approach, the paper represents an important step towards developing more flexible and robust artificial neural networks that can better capture the self-organizing principles observed in biological neural networks. As the field of AI continues to evolve, such biologically-inspired techniques may play an increasingly important role in advancing the state of the art.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Evolving Self-Assembling Neural Networks: From Spontaneous Activity to Experience-Dependent Learning
Erwan Plantec, Joachin W. Pedersen, Milton L. Montero, Eleni Nisioti, Sebastian Risi
0
0
Biological neural networks are characterized by their high degree of plasticity, a core property that enables the remarkable adaptability of natural organisms. Importantly, this ability affects both the synaptic strength and the topology of the nervous systems. Artificial neural networks, on the other hand, have been mainly designed as static, fully connected structures that can be notoriously brittle in the face of changing environments and novel inputs. Building on previous works on Neural Developmental Programs (NDPs), we propose a class of self-organizing neural networks capable of synaptic and structural plasticity in an activity and reward-dependent manner which we call Lifelong Neural Developmental Program (LNDP). We present an instance of such a network built on the graph transformer architecture and propose a mechanism for pre-experience plasticity based on the spontaneous activity of sensory neurons. Our results demonstrate the ability of the model to learn from experiences in different control tasks starting from randomly connected or empty networks. We further show that structural plasticity is advantageous in environments necessitating fast adaptation or with non-stationary rewards.
6/17/2024
🌐
Evolving generalist controllers to handle a wide range of morphological variations
Corinna Triebold, Anil Yaman
0
0
Neuro-evolutionary methods have proven effective in addressing a wide range of tasks. However, the study of the robustness and generalizability of evolved artificial neural networks (ANNs) has remained limited. This has immense implications in the fields like robotics where such controllers are used in control tasks. Unexpected morphological or environmental changes during operation can risk failure if the ANN controllers are unable to handle these changes. This paper proposes an algorithm that aims to enhance the robustness and generalizability of the controllers. This is achieved by introducing morphological variations during the evolutionary training process. As a results, it is possible to discover generalist controllers that can handle a wide range of morphological variations sufficiently without the need of the information regarding their morphologies or adaptation of their parameters. We perform an extensive experimental analysis on simulation that demonstrates the trade-off between specialist and generalist controllers. The results show that generalists are able to control a range of morphological variations with a cost of underperforming on a specific morphology relative to a specialist. This research contributes to the field by addressing the limited understanding of robustness and generalizability and proposes a method by which to improve these properties.
5/17/2024
Protein pathways as a catalyst to directed evolution of the topology of artificial neural networks
Oscar Lao, Konstantinos Zacharopoulos, Apostolos Fournaris, Rossano Schifanella, Ioannis Arapakis
0
0
In the present article, we propose a paradigm shift on evolving Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) towards a new bio-inspired design that is grounded on the structural properties, interactions, and dynamics of protein networks (PNs): the Artificial Protein Network (APN). This introduces several advantages previously unrealized by state-of-the-art approaches in NE: (1) We can draw inspiration from how nature, thanks to millions of years of evolution, efficiently encodes protein interactions in the DNA to translate our APN to silicon DNA. This helps bridge the gap between syntax and semantics observed in current NE approaches. (2) We can learn from how nature builds networks in our genes, allowing us to design new and smarter networks through EA evolution. (3) We can perform EA crossover/mutation operations and evolution steps, replicating the operations observed in nature directly on the genotype of networks, thus exploring and exploiting the phenotypic space, such that we avoid getting trapped in sub-optimal solutions. (4) Our novel definition of APN opens new ways to leverage our knowledge about different living things and processes from biology. (5) Using biologically inspired encodings, we can model more complex demographic and ecological relationships (e.g., virus-host or predator-prey interactions), allowing us to optimise for multiple, often conflicting objectives.
6/10/2024
🧠
Structurally Flexible Neural Networks: Evolving the Building Blocks for General Agents
Joachim Winther Pedersen, Erwan Plantec, Eleni Nisioti, Milton Montero, Sebastian Risi
0
0
Artificial neural networks used for reinforcement learning are structurally rigid, meaning that each optimized parameter of the network is tied to its specific placement in the network structure. It also means that a network only works with pre-defined and fixed input- and output sizes. This is a consequence of having the number of optimized parameters being directly dependent on the structure of the network. Structural rigidity limits the ability to optimize parameters of policies across multiple environments that do not share input and output spaces. Here, we evolve a set of neurons and plastic synapses each represented by a gated recurrent unit (GRU). During optimization, the parameters of these fundamental units of a neural network are optimized in different random structural configurations. Earlier work has shown that parameter sharing between units is important for making structurally flexible neurons We show that it is possible to optimize a set of distinct neuron- and synapse types allowing for a mitigation of the symmetry dilemma. We demonstrate this by optimizing a single set of neurons and synapses to solve multiple reinforcement learning control tasks simultaneously.
5/20/2024