Examining the Interplay Between Privacy and Fairness for Speech Processing: A Review and Perspective
0
🗣️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Speech technology is being increasingly used in sensitive domains like healthcare and law enforcement.
- For these technologies to be effective, they need to work reliably for all users while protecting individual privacy.
- Tradeoffs between privacy, fairness, and utility have been researched, but the specific interaction between privacy and fairness in speech processing is not well-understood.
Plain English Explanation
Speech recognition and generation technologies are becoming more common in our daily lives, including in sensitive areas like healthcare and law enforcement. For these technologies to be useful, they need to work well for everyone who uses them, while also protecting the privacy of individual users.
Researchers have looked at the tradeoffs between protecting privacy, ensuring fairness, and maximizing the usefulness of these technologies. However, the specific relationship between privacy and fairness in speech processing is not yet fully explored.
This paper provides an overview of the emerging issues around privacy and fairness in the development of speech processing models. It examines the existing biases and sources of privacy harm that can arise during the machine learning process for these models. It also discusses how efforts to protect privacy can inadvertently increase these biases, and how trying to reduce biases can sometimes compromise privacy.
By highlighting these open questions, the paper advocates for a more comprehensive evaluation of the tradeoffs between privacy and fairness in speech technology. It calls for the development of algorithms that can effectively balance the need for privacy-protection and fairness in this domain.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by noting the increasing deployment of speech technologies in sensitive domains like healthcare and law enforcement. For these technologies to be effective, they must work reliably for all users while preserving individual privacy.
The authors explain that while the tradeoffs between privacy and utility, as well as fairness and utility, have been extensively researched, the specific interplay between privacy and fairness in speech processing remains underexplored. To address this gap, the paper offers an overview of emerging privacy-fairness tradeoffs throughout the entire machine learning lifecycle for speech processing.
The researchers draw on established frameworks for fairness and privacy to examine the existing biases and sources of privacy harm that can coexist during the development of speech processing models. They then highlight how corresponding privacy-enhancing technologies have the potential to inadvertently increase these biases, and how bias mitigation strategies may conversely reduce privacy.
By raising these open questions, the paper advocates for a comprehensive evaluation of privacy-fairness tradeoffs for speech technology. It calls for the development of privacy-enhancing and fairness-aware algorithms in this domain.
Critical Analysis
The paper effectively identifies an important and underexplored issue at the intersection of privacy and fairness in speech processing technologies. By drawing on established frameworks, the authors provide a solid foundation for examining the various tradeoffs and challenges in this area.
One potential limitation is that the paper is primarily a conceptual overview rather than presenting new empirical findings. The authors acknowledge this and call for further research to better understand the specific dynamics between privacy and fairness in real-world speech processing systems.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the need for comprehensive evaluation of privacy-fairness tradeoffs, it does not provide detailed guidance on how to conduct such evaluations or what metrics or methodologies would be most appropriate. Addressing these practical implementation details could strengthen the impact of the research.
Overall, the paper makes a compelling case for the importance of considering privacy and fairness in tandem when developing speech technologies, particularly in sensitive domains. The open questions and call for further research provide a valuable roadmap for advancing this emerging area of study.
Conclusion
This paper offers a timely and important perspective on the interplay between privacy and fairness in speech processing technologies. As these technologies become more prevalent in our daily lives, including in sensitive domains, it is crucial to ensure they work reliably for all users while protecting individual privacy.
By highlighting the existing biases and sources of privacy harm, as well as the potential unintended consequences of privacy-enhancing and bias mitigation efforts, the paper underscores the need for a more comprehensive evaluation of the privacy-fairness tradeoffs in this space.
The authors' call for the development of privacy-enhancing and fairness-aware algorithms is a valuable contribution that could help shape the future direction of speech technology research and deployment. Addressing these complex challenges will be essential for realizing the full potential of speech technologies while upholding important ethical principles.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🗣️
0
Examining the Interplay Between Privacy and Fairness for Speech Processing: A Review and Perspective
Anna Leschanowsky, Sneha Das
Speech technology has been increasingly deployed in various areas of daily life including sensitive domains such as healthcare and law enforcement. For these technologies to be effective, they must work reliably for all users while preserving individual privacy. Although tradeoffs between privacy and utility, as well as fairness and utility, have been extensively researched, the specific interplay between privacy and fairness in speech processing remains underexplored. This review and position paper offers an overview of emerging privacy-fairness tradeoffs throughout the entire machine learning lifecycle for speech processing. By drawing on well-established frameworks on fairness and privacy, we examine existing biases and sources of privacy harm that coexist during the development of speech processing models. We then highlight how corresponding privacy-enhancing technologies have the potential to inadvertently increase these biases and how bias mitigation strategies may conversely reduce privacy. By raising open questions, we advocate for a comprehensive evaluation of privacy-fairness tradeoffs for speech technology and the development of privacy-enhancing and fairness-aware algorithms in this domain.
Read more9/6/2024
🌐
0
A Multivocal Literature Review on Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning
Beatrice Balbierer, Lukas Heinlein, Domenique Zipperling, Niklas Kuhl
Federated Learning presents a way to revolutionize AI applications by eliminating the necessity for data sharing. Yet, research has shown that information can still be extracted during training, making additional privacy-preserving measures such as differential privacy imperative. To implement real-world federated learning applications, fairness, ranging from a fair distribution of performance to non-discriminative behaviour, must be considered. Particularly in high-risk applications (e.g. healthcare), avoiding the repetition of past discriminatory errors is paramount. As recent research has demonstrated an inherent tension between privacy and fairness, we conduct a multivocal literature review to examine the current methods to integrate privacy and fairness in federated learning. Our analyses illustrate that the relationship between privacy and fairness has been neglected, posing a critical risk for real-world applications. We highlight the need to explore the relationship between privacy, fairness, and performance, advocating for the creation of integrated federated learning frameworks.
Read more8/19/2024
🗣️
0
Privacy in Speech Technology
Tom Backstrom
Speech technology for communication, accessing information and services has rapidly improved in quality. It is convenient and appealing because speech is the primary mode of communication for humans. Such technology however also presents proven threats to privacy. Speech is a tool for communication and it will thus inherently contain private information. Importantly, it however also contains a wealth of side information, such as information related to health, emotions, affiliations, and relationships, all of which are private. Exposing such private information can lead to serious threats such as price gouging, harassment, extortion, and stalking. This paper is a tutorial on privacy issues related to speech technology, modeling their threats, approaches for protecting users' privacy, measuring the performance of privacy-protecting methods, perception of privacy as well as societal and legal consequences. In addition to a tutorial overview, it also presents lines for further development where improvements are most urgently needed.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness
Mengmeng Yang, Ming Ding, Youyang Qu, Wei Ni, David Smith, Thierry Rakotoarivelo
The worldwide adoption of machine learning (ML) and deep learning models, particularly in critical sectors, such as healthcare and finance, presents substantial challenges in maintaining individual privacy and fairness. These two elements are vital to a trustworthy environment for learning systems. While numerous studies have concentrated on protecting individual privacy through differential privacy (DP) mechanisms, emerging research indicates that differential privacy in machine learning models can unequally impact separate demographic subgroups regarding prediction accuracy. This leads to a fairness concern, and manifests as biased performance. Although the prevailing view is that enhancing privacy intensifies fairness disparities, a smaller, yet significant, subset of research suggests the opposite view. In this article, with extensive evaluation results, we demonstrate that the impact of differential privacy on fairness is not monotonous. Instead, we observe that the accuracy disparity initially grows as more DP noise (enhanced privacy) is added to the ML process, but subsequently diminishes at higher privacy levels with even more noise. Moreover, implementing gradient clipping in the differentially private stochastic gradient descent ML method can mitigate the negative impact of DP noise on fairness. This mitigation is achieved by moderating the disparity growth through a lower clipping threshold.
Read more4/16/2024