Expanding Accessibility in Immersive Virtual Spaces: A Comprehensive Approach for All Disabilities

Overview

• During the COVID-19 pandemic, many events and conferences shifted to virtual formats, and virtual and augmented reality environments became more prominent.
• While these virtual spaces increased accessibility for some, others were left behind.
• In 2024, many events returned to in-person venues, but virtual spaces remain crucial in academic and research communities, particularly for disabled scholars.
• This paper advocates for continued virtual access and improved virtual spaces, while also identifying potential harms in immersive and embodied virtual environments.

Plain English Explanation

When the COVID-19 pandemic first hit, many events and conferences quickly transitioned to virtual formats, and companies started developing tools to help people seamlessly move into virtual spaces. This included a lot of effort to expand and monetize augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) environments. While these virtual spaces made some events more accessible for certain people, others were left out.

Fast forward to 2024, and many events have returned to in-person venues, but virtual spaces remain essential in academic and research communities, especially for scholars with disabilities. This paper argues that we should continue to provide virtual access options and work on improving virtual environments. At the same time, the authors identify some potential harms or downsides that may have been overlooked in these immersive and embodied virtual spaces.

Technical Explanation

The paper does not present a specific technical study or experiment. Instead, it provides a high-level analysis of the shift to virtual events and environments during the COVID-19 pandemic and the current state of virtual access, particularly in academic and research communities.

The key points made in the technical explanation are:

• In the early stages of the pandemic, many events and conferences hastily converted to virtual formats, and companies quickly developed tools to enable this transition to virtual spaces.
• Efforts to expand and monetize augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) environments increased during this time.
• While these virtual spaces increased accessibility for some, others were left behind, unable to fully participate.
• In 2024, many events have returned to in-person venues, but virtual spaces remain central in academic and research communities, especially for disabled scholars.
• The paper advocates for continued virtual access and improved virtual spaces, while also identifying potential harms and overlooked issues in immersive and embodied virtual environments.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important points about the rapid shift to virtual environments during the pandemic and the ongoing role of virtual access, particularly in academic and research communities. By highlighting both the benefits and potential harms of these virtual spaces, the authors encourage readers to think critically about the design and implementation of virtual environments.

One limitation not addressed in the paper is the specific challenges and barriers faced by different groups in accessing and participating in virtual events and environments. The paper could have delved deeper into the nuances of accessibility and inclusivity, exploring how factors like socioeconomic status, geographical location, and technological literacy can further marginalize certain communities.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much detail on the "potentially overlooked harms" in immersive and embodied virtual spaces. While it acknowledges the existence of such harms, a more thorough exploration of these issues and potential mitigation strategies would have strengthened the paper's analysis.

Despite these minor limitations, the paper serves as a thought-provoking starting point for discussions around the evolving role of virtual access and the need to design inclusive, ethical, and user-centric virtual environments. Readers are encouraged to further explore related research, such as Exploring Proactive Interventions Toward Harmful Behavior in Embodied Virtual Environments, From Virtual Gains to Real Pains: Potential Harms of Immersive Technologies, and Fostering Inclusive Virtual Reality Environments: Discussing Strategies, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in this rapidly evolving field.

Conclusion

This paper provides a timely analysis of the shift to virtual events and environments during the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing role of virtual access, particularly in academic and research communities. While virtual spaces have increased accessibility for some, the authors highlight the need to continue improving these environments and address potential harms that may have been overlooked.

By advocating for sustained virtual access and more thoughtful design of immersive and embodied virtual spaces, the paper encourages readers to consider the broader implications of this technological transformation. As virtual environments become increasingly integrated into various aspects of our lives, it is crucial to ensure they are inclusive, ethical, and responsive to the diverse needs of all users.