Experiences of Censorship on TikTok Across Marginalised Identities

Overview

• This paper explores the experiences of marginalized users on the social media platform TikTok, focusing on instances of censorship and content moderation.
• The researchers conducted interviews with TikTok users from diverse backgrounds to understand how content policies and algorithms may disproportionately impact certain communities.
• The findings highlight systemic biases in TikTok's content moderation practices and the challenges marginalized users face in expressing themselves on the platform.

Plain English Explanation

Experiences of Censorship on TikTok Across Marginalised Identities

Social media platforms like TikTok often have content policies and automated systems in place to moderate user-generated content. However, these systems can sometimes unfairly target and censor posts from people with marginalized identities, such as racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, or those with disabilities.

This research paper explores the experiences of these marginalized users on TikTok. The researchers interviewed people from diverse backgrounds to understand how TikTok's content moderation policies and algorithms may disproportionately impact their ability to express themselves on the platform.

The findings reveal systemic biases in TikTok's approach to content moderation. Marginalized users reported having their posts removed or accounts suspended for seemingly innocuous content, while similar posts from mainstream users were left untouched. This suggests the platform's automated systems may be unable to properly contextualize and evaluate content from marginalized perspectives.

Additionally, the researchers found that marginalized users often felt powerless to challenge TikTok's decisions or advocate for more inclusive policies. This can create a chilling effect, where people from diverse backgrounds are hesitant to share their authentic experiences out of fear of being censored.

The paper highlights the importance of ensuring social media platforms foster an inclusive and equitable environment for all users, regardless of their identity or background. By addressing the biases and shortcomings in their content moderation practices, platforms like TikTok can work to empower marginalized communities and give them a stronger voice in the digital space.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a qualitative study to explore the experiences of censorship on TikTok across marginalized identities. They recruited a diverse sample of TikTok users from various backgrounds, including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, and users with disabilities.

Through semi-structured interviews, the researchers gathered insights into how these marginalized users perceived and experienced TikTok's content moderation policies and practices. The interview protocol focused on understanding participants' experiences with content removal, account suspension, and interactions with TikTok's support systems.

The analysis of the interview data revealed several key themes:

1. Disproportionate Censorship: Marginalized users reported having their content removed or their accounts suspended for seemingly innocuous posts, while similar content from mainstream users was left untouched. This suggests systemic biases in TikTok's automated content moderation systems.

2. Lack of Transparency and Recourse: Participants expressed frustration with the opaque nature of TikTok's content moderation processes and the difficulty in challenging platform decisions. Many felt powerless to advocate for more inclusive policies.

3. Chilling Effect on Expression: The fear of arbitrary censorship led some marginalized users to self-censor or limit their authentic expression on the platform, stifling their ability to share their experiences.

The researchers argue that these findings highlight the need for social media platforms to address biases in their content moderation practices and work towards more inclusive and equitable policies. By empowering marginalized users and giving them a stronger voice, platforms can foster a more diverse and representative digital space.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the experiences of marginalized users on TikTok, shedding light on the challenges they face in expressing themselves on the platform. The researchers' qualitative approach, involving in-depth interviews with a diverse sample of participants, allows for a nuanced understanding of the systemic biases and power imbalances within TikTok's content moderation system.

However, the study also has some limitations. As a qualitative investigation, the findings may not be generalizable to the entire TikTok user base, and larger-scale quantitative analyses could provide a broader perspective on the prevalence and patterns of censorship across different marginalized groups.

Additionally, the research does not delve into the technical details of TikTok's content moderation algorithms or the specific criteria used to flag and remove content. Further insight into the inner workings of these systems could help identify more precise points of intervention and improvement.

Future research could explore the experiences of marginalized users on other social media platforms, drawing comparisons and identifying common themes or platform-specific challenges. Longitudinal studies tracking the evolution of content moderation policies and their impact on marginalized communities would also be valuable.

Overall, this paper serves as an important contribution to the growing body of research on algorithmic bias and the disproportionate impact of content moderation on underrepresented groups. By highlighting the need for more inclusive and transparent platform policies, the study encourages social media companies to prioritize equity and empower marginalized voices in the digital sphere.

Conclusion

The research on experiences of censorship on TikTok across marginalized identities reveals significant systemic biases in the platform's content moderation practices. Marginalized users, including racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, and people with disabilities, reported disproportionate censorship of their posts and a lack of transparency in TikTok's decision-making processes.

These findings underscore the importance of ensuring social media platforms foster more inclusive and equitable environments for all users, regardless of their identity or background. By addressing the biases in their automated systems and empowering marginalized communities, platforms like TikTok can work to create a digital space that truly represents the diversity of its user base and gives a voice to those who have historically been marginalized.