Experimental comparison of 5G SDR platforms: srsRAN x OpenAirInterface
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Experimental comparison of 5G software-defined radio (SDR) platforms: srsRAN and OpenAirInterface
- Evaluates the performance and capabilities of these two prominent open-source 5G SDR platforms
- Provides insights to help researchers and developers choose the appropriate platform for their 5G research and deployment needs
Plain English Explanation
This paper offers a detailed comparison of two leading open-source software platforms used for building and testing 5G cellular networks: srsRAN and OpenAirInterface. These platforms allow researchers and developers to experiment with 5G technology without needing to build expensive dedicated hardware.
The researchers thoroughly evaluated the performance and features of each platform, looking at factors like processing speed, power consumption, and supported 5G functionalities. This helps provide guidance to the community on which platform may be best suited for different 5G research and development needs.
For example, the paper discusses how srsRAN may be better for simpler 5G setups, while OpenAirInterface offers more advanced features like support for O-RAN and 5G standalone mode. The analysis also covers ease of use, documentation, and community support for each platform.
Overall, this work gives researchers and engineers a detailed, impartial comparison to help them choose the 5G SDR platform that best fits their project requirements.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an experimental evaluation and comparison of two prominent open-source 5G software-defined radio (SDR) platforms: srsRAN and OpenAirInterface. 5G SDR platforms allow developers to build and test 5G networks without specialized hardware, using software running on general-purpose computing platforms.
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to compare the performance and capabilities of the two platforms across various metrics, including:
- Processing speed: Measured the real-time processing capabilities of the platforms under different 5G workloads.
- Power consumption: Evaluated the energy efficiency of the platforms when running 5G base station software.
- Supported 5G features: Tested the platforms' support for key 5G functionalities like O-RAN and 5G standalone mode.
- Ease of use and documentation: Assessed the platforms' software maturity, user-friendliness, and available resources for developers.
The results provide insights into the trade-offs and relative strengths of srsRAN and OpenAirInterface. For example, srsRAN was found to be more lightweight and efficient for simpler 5G setups, while OpenAirInterface offered more advanced 5G features at the cost of higher resource requirements.
The paper also discusses how the choice of 5G SDR platform can impact factors like 5G network planning and analysis, wireless channel emulation, and security considerations.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed experimental comparison of srsRAN and OpenAirInterface, two leading 5G SDR platforms. The researchers have identified key performance metrics and feature sets that are relevant for researchers and engineers working on 5G technology.
However, the paper acknowledges some limitations in its scope. For example, it does not cover the platforms' capabilities for advanced 5G use cases like Terahertz communications or their integration with other 5G components like the core network.
Additionally, the paper's evaluation is based on a specific hardware and software configuration, so the relative performance of srsRAN and OpenAirInterface may differ in other deployment scenarios. Further research could explore the platforms' scalability and adaptability to a wider range of 5G testbed setups.
Overall, this paper provides a valuable benchmark for the research community, helping developers make informed decisions on which 5G SDR platform best fits their project requirements. As 5G technology continues to evolve, ongoing comparative analyses of open-source tools like these will be crucial for advancing 5G research and deployment.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive experimental comparison of two prominent open-source 5G software-defined radio (SDR) platforms: srsRAN and OpenAirInterface. The researchers have conducted a thorough evaluation of these platforms across key performance metrics and feature sets relevant for 5G research and development.
The findings provide guidance to the research community on the trade-offs and relative strengths of these 5G SDR platforms, helping developers choose the most suitable option for their project needs. This work contributes to the wider ecosystem of open-source 5G tools and testbeds, which are essential for driving innovation and accelerating the deployment of 5G technology.
As 5G continues to evolve, ongoing comparative analyses of open-source platforms like those presented in this paper will be crucial for ensuring researchers and engineers have the right tools to explore the full potential of 5G networks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Experimental comparison of 5G SDR platforms: srsRAN x OpenAirInterface
Ruan P. Alves, Joao Guilherme A. da S. Alves, Mikael R. Camelo, Wilker O. de Feitosa, Victor F. Monteiro, Fco. Rodrigo P. Cavalcanti
A Software-Defined Radio (SDR) platform is a communication system that implements as software functions that are typically implemented in dedicated hardware. One of its main advantages is the flexibility to test and deploy radio communication networks in a fast and cheap way. In the context of the Fifth Generation (5G) of wireless cellular networks, there are open source SDR platforms available online. Two of the most popular SDR platforms are srsRAN and OpenAirInterface. This paper presents these two platforms, the characteristics of the networks created by them, the possibilities of changes in their interfaces and configurations, and also their limits. Moreover, in this paper, we also evaluate and compare both platforms in an experimental setup deployed in a laboratory.
Read more6/4/2024
🤔
0
A Flexible Cryptographic Infrastructure for High-security SDR-based Systems
Peter Hillmann, Bjorn Stelte
Military software defined radio (SDR) systems are a major factor in future network-centric operations due to their flexibility and support for more capable radio communications systems. The inherent nature of software-based systems requires a more complex auxiliary infrastructure and multiple independent levels of security compared with typical systems: Secure booting of the SDR device, cryptographically signed software, real time operating platform software as well as radio applications. This technology raises new challenges with respect to the management. The largest impact on SDR deployments is due to the auxiliary cryptographic infrastructure for the security of the software life cycle and the cyclic update of the keys. Compared to conventional radio devices, the SDR system with the cryptographic infrastructure described in this paper reaches a higher security level and is more flexible. The advantage is the possibility to deploy trunked radio system and further waveforms, such as coalition wideband, which will be standardized in the future. Also it is possible to update cryptographic mechanisms. In this work, we analyze the requirements for a high secure SDR deployment and model the life cycle of the components of a deployed SDR node based on the Joint Program Executive Office (JPEO) Software Communication Architecture (SCA).
Read more6/26/2024
🤖
0
Implementing and Evaluating Security in O-RAN: Interfaces, Intelligence, and Platforms
Joshua Groen, Salvatore DOro, Utku Demir, Leonardo Bonati, Michele Polese, Tommaso Melodia, Kaushik Chowdhury
The Open Radio Access Network (RAN) is a networking paradigm that builds on top of cloud-based, multi-vendor, open and intelligent architectures to shape the next generation of cellular networks for 5G and beyond. While this new paradigm comes with many advantages in terms of observatibility and reconfigurability of the network, it inevitably expands the threat surface of cellular systems and can potentially expose its components to several cyber attacks, thus making securing O-RAN networks a necessity. In this paper, we explore the security aspects of O-RAN systems by focusing on the specifications and architectures proposed by the O-RAN Alliance. We address the problem of securing O-RAN systems with a holistic perspective, including considerations on the open interfaces used to interconnect the different O-RAN components, on the overall platform, and on the intelligence used to monitor and control the network. For each focus area we identify threats, discuss relevant solutions to address these issues, and demonstrate experimentally how such solutions can effectively defend O-RAN systems against selected cyber attacks. This article is the first work in approaching the security aspect of O-RAN holistically and with experimental evidence obtained on a state-of-the-art programmable O-RAN platform, thus providing unique guideline for researchers in the field.
Read more7/26/2024
✅
0
X5G: An Open, Programmable, Multi-vendor, End-to-end, Private 5G O-RAN Testbed with NVIDIA ARC and OpenAirInterface
Davide Villa, Imran Khan, Florian Kaltenberger, Nicholas Hedberg, R'uben Soares da Silva, Stefano Maxenti, Leonardo Bonati, Anupa Kelkar, Chris Dick, Eduardo Baena, Josep M. Jornet, Tommaso Melodia, Michele Polese, Dimitrios Koutsonikolas
As Fifth generation (5G) cellular systems transition to softwarized, programmable, and intelligent networks, it becomes fundamental to enable public and private 5G deployments that are (i) primarily based on software components while (ii) maintaining or exceeding the performance of traditional monolithic systems and (iii) enabling programmability through bespoke configurations and optimized deployments. This requires hardware acceleration to scale the Physical (PHY) layer performance, programmable elements in the Radio Access Network (RAN) and intelligent controllers at the edge, careful planning of the Radio Frequency (RF) environment, as well as end-to-end integration and testing. In this paper, we describe how we developed the programmable X5G testbed, addressing these challenges through the deployment of the first 8-node network based on the integration of NVIDIA Aerial RAN CoLab (ARC), OpenAirInterface (OAI), and a near-real-time RAN Intelligent Controller (RIC). The Aerial Software Development Kit (SDK) provides the PHY layer, accelerated on Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), with the higher layers from the OAI open-source project interfaced with the PHY through the Small Cell Forum (SCF) Functional Application Platform Interface (FAPI). An E2 agent provides connectivity to the O-RAN Software Community (OSC) near-real-time RIC. We discuss software integration, the network infrastructure, and a digital twin framework for RF planning. We then profile the performance with up to 4 Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) smartphones for each base station with iPerf and video streaming applications, measuring a cell rate higher than 500 Mbps in downlink and 45 Mbps in uplink.
Read more6/26/2024