An Experimental Comparison of Partitioning Strategies for Distributed Graph Neural Network Training
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become a popular area of deep learning for working with graph-structured data.
- Training GNNs on large-scale graphs requires distributing the training process across multiple machines.
- Graph partitioning is a crucial prerequisite for distributed GNN training, but its impact on training performance is not well understood.
Plain English Explanation
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a type of machine learning model that can work with data organized in a graph structure, rather than the typical grid-like data that most neural networks process. Graphs are useful for representing complex, interconnected systems like social networks, transportation networks, or chemical compounds.
Training GNNs on very large graphs, however, can be computationally intensive and memory-hungry. To make this process more efficient, researchers often distribute the training across multiple computers in a cluster. But before you can distribute the training, you need to split up the large input graph into smaller pieces that can be processed in parallel.
This process of dividing up the graph is called graph partitioning, and it's an important step in enabling distributed GNN training. But researchers haven't thoroughly investigated how the quality of this graph partitioning step affects the actual performance of the distributed GNN training. That's what this paper set out to study.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted experiments using two different GNN systems and tested various factors like GNN model parameters, batch size, graph type, feature size, and the number of machines used for distributed training. They compared the training performance and memory usage when using different graph partitioning methods, including vertex partitioning and edge partitioning.
The key finding is that using high-quality graph partitioning techniques can significantly speed up GNN training and reduce memory consumption. The time invested in partitioning the graph is quickly amortized by the gains in training efficiency. This is in contrast to distributed graph processing systems, where partitioning is less crucial.
The researchers conclude that graph partitioning is an even more important optimization for distributed GNN training compared to other distributed graph workloads. This motivates further research into developing better graph partitioning algorithms specifically tailored for GNN training.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough experimental evaluation of how graph partitioning impacts distributed GNN training. However, the study is limited to a fixed set of GNN models, graphs, and hardware configurations. Additional research is needed to see if the findings generalize to a wider range of scenarios, including newer GNN architectures and different types of graph-structured data.
The paper also does not explore the trade-offs between the quality of the graph partitioning and the time/computational resources required to perform the partitioning. In real-world settings, there may be constraints on the partitioning time or hardware available, so further research is needed to understand these practical considerations.
Additionally, the paper does not investigate the effects of graph partitioning on the final model performance (e.g., prediction accuracy). It's possible that certain partitioning strategies could negatively impact the model's ability to learn the underlying patterns in the data, which would be an important factor to consider.
Conclusion
This research highlights the critical role that graph partitioning plays in enabling efficient distributed training of graph neural networks. By carefully partitioning the input graph, researchers and practitioners can significantly speed up the GNN training process and reduce memory requirements, making it feasible to work with very large-scale graph-structured data. This work motivates further research into developing advanced graph partitioning algorithms specifically tailored for GNN training workloads.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
An Experimental Comparison of Partitioning Strategies for Distributed Graph Neural Network Training
Nikolai Merkel, Daniel Stoll, Ruben Mayer, Hans-Arno Jacobsen
Recently, graph neural networks (GNNs) have gained much attention as a growing area of deep learning capable of learning on graph-structured data. However, the computational and memory requirements for training GNNs on large-scale graphs make it necessary to distribute the training. A prerequisite for distributed GNN training is to partition the input graph into smaller parts that are distributed among multiple machines of a compute cluster. Although graph partitioning has been studied with regard to graph analytics and graph databases, its effect on GNN training performance is largely unexplored. As a consequence, it is unclear whether investing computational efforts into high-quality graph partitioning would pay off in GNN training scenarios. In this paper, we study the effectiveness of graph partitioning for distributed GNN training. Our study aims to understand how different factors such as GNN parameters, mini-batch size, graph type, features size, and scale-out factor influence the effectiveness of graph partitioning. We conduct experiments with two different GNN systems using vertex and edge partitioning. We found that high-quality graph partitioning is a very effective optimization to speed up GNN training and to reduce memory consumption. Furthermore, our results show that invested partitioning time can quickly be amortized by reduced GNN training time, making it a relevant optimization for most GNN scenarios. Compared to research on distributed graph processing, our study reveals that graph partitioning plays an even more significant role in distributed GNN training, which motivates further research on the graph partitioning problem.
Read more8/13/2024
0
VLSI Hypergraph Partitioning with Deep Learning
Muhammad Hadir Khan, Bugra Onal, Eren Dogan, Matthew R. Guthaus
Partitioning is a known problem in computer science and is critical in chip design workflows, as advancements in this area can significantly influence design quality and efficiency. Deep Learning (DL) techniques, particularly those involving Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), have demonstrated strong performance in various node, edge, and graph prediction tasks using both inductive and transductive learning methods. A notable area of recent interest within GNNs are pooling layers and their application to graph partitioning. While these methods have yielded promising results across social, computational, and other random graphs, their effectiveness has not yet been explored in the context of VLSI hypergraph netlists. In this study, we introduce a new set of synthetic partitioning benchmarks that emulate real-world netlist characteristics and possess a known upper bound for solution cut quality. We distinguish these benchmarks with the prior work and evaluate existing state-of-the-art partitioning algorithms alongside GNN-based approaches, highlighting their respective advantages and disadvantages.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Large Scale Training of Graph Neural Networks for Optimal Markov-Chain Partitioning Using the Kemeny Constant
Sam Alexander Martino, Jo~ao Morado, Chenghao Li, Zhenghao Lu, Edina Rosta
Traditional clustering algorithms often struggle to capture the complex relationships within graphs and generalise to arbitrary clustering criteria. The emergence of graph neural networks (GNNs) as a powerful framework for learning representations of graph data provides new approaches to solving the problem. Previous work has shown GNNs to be capable of proposing partitionings using a variety of criteria, however, these approaches have not yet been extended to work on Markov chains or kinetic networks. These arise frequently in the study of molecular systems and are of particular interest to the biochemical modelling community. In this work, we propose several GNN-based architectures to tackle the graph partitioning problem for Markov Chains described as kinetic networks. This approach aims to minimize how much a proposed partitioning changes the Kemeny constant. We propose using an encoder-decoder architecture and show how simple GraphSAGE-based GNNs with linear layers can outperform much larger and more expressive attention-based models in this context. As a proof of concept, we first demonstrate the method's ability to cluster randomly connected graphs. We also use a linear chain architecture corresponding to a 1D free energy profile as our kinetic network. Subsequently, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through experiments on a data set derived from molecular dynamics. We compare the performance of our method to other partitioning techniques such as PCCA+. We explore the importance of feature and hyperparameter selection and propose a general strategy for large-scale parallel training of GNNs for discovering optimal graph partitionings.
Read more9/6/2024
🧠
0
GSplit: Scaling Graph Neural Network Training on Large Graphs via Split-Parallelism
Sandeep Polisetty, Juelin Liu, Kobi Falus, Yi Ren Fung, Seung-Hwan Lim, Hui Guan, Marco Serafini
Graph neural networks (GNNs), an emerging class of machine learning models for graphs, have gained popularity for their superior performance in various graph analytical tasks. Mini-batch training is commonly used to train GNNs on large graphs, and data parallelism is the standard approach to scale mini-batch training across multiple GPUs. One of the major performance costs in GNN training is the loading of input features, which prevents GPUs from being fully utilized. In this paper, we argue that this problem is exacerbated by redundancies that are inherent to the data parallel approach. To address this issue, we introduce a hybrid parallel mini-batch training paradigm called split parallelism. Split parallelism avoids redundant data loads and splits the sampling and training of each mini-batch across multiple GPUs online, at each iteration, using a lightweight splitting algorithm. We implement split parallelism in GSplit and show that it outperforms state-of-the-art mini-batch training systems like DGL, Quiver, and $P^3$.
Read more6/28/2024