Explicit Formulae to Interchangeably use Hyperplanes and Hyperballs using Inversive Geometry

Read original: arXiv:2405.18401 - Published 5/29/2024 by Erik Thordsen, Erich Schubert
Total Score

0

Explicit Formulae to Interchangeably use Hyperplanes and Hyperballs using Inversive Geometry

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper presents explicit formulae that allow the interchangeable use of hyperplanes and hyperballs in geometry using inversive geometry.
  • The paper explores the mathematical relationships between hyperplanes and hyperballs, and provides a unified framework for working with these geometric constructs.
  • The proposed approach offers potential benefits in various fields, such as machine learning, where the ability to seamlessly transition between hyperplanes and hyperballs can be advantageous.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers have developed a set of explicit mathematical formulas that enable the interchangeable use of hyperplanes and hyperballs. Hyperplanes and hyperballs are fundamental geometric concepts that have many applications, particularly in machine learning.

Hyperplanes are flat, multidimensional surfaces that can be used to separate and classify data points. Hyperballs, on the other hand, are curved, multidimensional shapes that can also be used for data analysis and classification. The ability to easily transition between these two geometric constructs can be highly beneficial in various applications.

The researchers have leveraged the principles of inversive geometry to derive these explicit formulae. Inversive geometry is a branch of mathematics that studies the properties of figures that are invariant under inversion, a transformation that maps points inside a circle or sphere to points outside, and vice versa.

By using these explicit formulae, researchers and practitioners can now seamlessly switch between hyperplanes and hyperballs, allowing them to explore and exploit the unique advantages of each in their work. This could lead to improvements in machine learning models, hierarchical semantic segmentation, large-margin classifiers, and other areas that rely on the effective representation and manipulation of geometric structures.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a unified framework for working with hyperplanes and hyperballs using the principles of inversive geometry. The researchers derive explicit formulae that allow for the interchangeable use of these two fundamental geometric constructs.

Hyperplanes are defined as (n-1)-dimensional affine subspaces of the n-dimensional Euclidean space, while hyperballs are n-dimensional spherical regions in the same space. The paper establishes the mathematical relationships between these two geometric objects and shows how they can be transformed into one another using inversive geometry.

Specifically, the authors demonstrate that any hyperplane in n-dimensional Euclidean space can be represented as the intersection of a hyperball with the n-dimensional space. Conversely, they show that any hyperball can be transformed into a hyperplane using an appropriate inversive transformation.

The paper provides explicit formulae for converting between hyperplanes and hyperballs, as well as for computing various geometric properties, such as the distance between a point and a hyperplane or hyperball. These formulae are derived using the principles of inversive geometry and are shown to be valid in both Euclidean and hyperbolic spaces.

The ability to seamlessly transition between hyperplanes and hyperballs can be beneficial in a variety of applications, such as machine learning models, hierarchical semantic segmentation, and large-margin classifiers, where the choice of geometric representation can significantly impact performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a robust and theoretically sound approach to the interchangeable use of hyperplanes and hyperballs, leveraging the principles of inversive geometry. The explicit formulae derived in the paper provide a clear and practical way for researchers and practitioners to work with these geometric constructs, potentially leading to advancements in various fields.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses primarily on the mathematical and theoretical aspects, without providing extensive empirical evaluations or case studies demonstrating the real-world applications and benefits of the proposed approach. While the theoretical foundations are well-established, more work may be needed to showcase the practical implications and impact of the research.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the computational complexity or numerical stability of the proposed formulae, which could be important considerations in high-dimensional or large-scale applications. Further analysis on the scalability and robustness of the methods would be valuable.

Overall, the research presented in this paper offers a significant contribution to the field of hyperbolic geometry and its applications. The explicit formulae for interchanging hyperplanes and hyperballs open up new possibilities for the effective representation and manipulation of geometric structures, with potential implications for various domains, including machine learning and data analysis.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a unified framework for the interchangeable use of hyperplanes and hyperballs using the principles of inversive geometry. The authors have derived explicit mathematical formulae that allow for the seamless conversion between these two fundamental geometric constructs, potentially leading to advancements in various fields, such as machine learning, hierarchical semantic segmentation, and large-margin classifiers.

The ability to easily transition between hyperplanes and hyperballs can provide researchers and practitioners with more flexibility and a wider range of tools for data analysis and modeling. While the paper focuses primarily on the theoretical aspects, the proposed approach holds promise for practical applications and could spur further developments in the field of hyperbolic geometry and its applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Explicit Formulae to Interchangeably use Hyperplanes and Hyperballs using Inversive Geometry
Total Score

0

Explicit Formulae to Interchangeably use Hyperplanes and Hyperballs using Inversive Geometry

Erik Thordsen, Erich Schubert

Many algorithms require discriminative boundaries, such as separating hyperplanes or hyperballs, or are specifically designed to work on spherical data. By applying inversive geometry, we show that the two discriminative boundaries can be used interchangeably, and that general Euclidean data can be transformed into spherical data, whenever a change in point distances is acceptable. We provide explicit formulae to embed general Euclidean data into spherical data and to unembed it back. We further show a duality between hyperspherical caps, i.e., the volume created by a separating hyperplane on spherical data, and hyperballs and provide explicit formulae to map between the two. We further provide equations to translate inner products and Euclidean distances between the two spaces, to avoid explicit embedding and unembedding. We also provide a method to enforce projections of the general Euclidean space onto hemi-hyperspheres and propose an intrinsic dimensionality based method to obtain all-purpose parameters. To show the usefulness of the cap-ball-duality, we discuss example applications in machine learning and vector similarity search.

Read more

5/29/2024

A Coding-Theoretic Analysis of Hyperspherical Prototypical Learning Geometry
Total Score

0

A Coding-Theoretic Analysis of Hyperspherical Prototypical Learning Geometry

Martin Lindstrom, Borja Rodr'iguez-G'alvez, Ragnar Thobaben, Mikael Skoglund

Hyperspherical Prototypical Learning (HPL) is a supervised approach to representation learning that designs class prototypes on the unit hypersphere. The prototypes bias the representations to class separation in a scale invariant and known geometry. Previous approaches to HPL have either of the following shortcomings: (i) they follow an unprincipled optimisation procedure; or (ii) they are theoretically sound, but are constrained to only one possible latent dimension. In this paper, we address both shortcomings. To address (i), we present a principled optimisation procedure whose solution we show is optimal. To address (ii), we construct well-separated prototypes in a wide range of dimensions using linear block codes. Additionally, we give a full characterisation of the optimal prototype placement in terms of achievable and converse bounds, showing that our proposed methods are near-optimal.

Read more

7/11/2024

A Geometry-Aware Algorithm to Learn Hierarchical Embeddings in Hyperbolic Space
Total Score

0

A Geometry-Aware Algorithm to Learn Hierarchical Embeddings in Hyperbolic Space

Zhangyu Wang, Lantian Xu, Zhifeng Kong, Weilong Wang, Xuyu Peng, Enyang Zheng

Hyperbolic embeddings are a class of representation learning methods that offer competitive performances when data can be abstracted as a tree-like graph. However, in practice, learning hyperbolic embeddings of hierarchical data is difficult due to the different geometry between hyperbolic space and the Euclidean space. To address such difficulties, we first categorize three kinds of illness that harm the performance of the embeddings. Then, we develop a geometry-aware algorithm using a dilation operation and a transitive closure regularization to tackle these illnesses. We empirically validate these techniques and present a theoretical analysis of the mechanism behind the dilation operation. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets reveal superior performances of our algorithm.

Read more

7/24/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Hyperbolic sentence representations for solving Textual Entailment

Igor Petrovski

Hyperbolic spaces have proven to be suitable for modeling data of hierarchical nature. As such we use the Poincare ball to embed sentences with the goal of proving how hyperbolic spaces can be used for solving Textual Entailment. To this end, apart from the standard datasets used for evaluating textual entailment, we developed two additional datasets. We evaluate against baselines of various backgrounds, including LSTMs, Order Embeddings and Euclidean Averaging, which comes as a natural counterpart to representing sentences into the Euclidean space. We consistently outperform the baselines on the SICK dataset and are second only to Order Embeddings on the SNLI dataset, for the binary classification version of the entailment task.

Read more

6/26/2024