Exploiting All Samples in Low-Resource Sentence Classification: Early Stopping and Initialization Parameters

Read original: arXiv:2111.06971 - Published 7/26/2024 by Hongseok Choi, Hyunju Lee
Total Score

0

↗️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Researchers often redesign models or add external data to improve deep learning performance in low-resource settings.
  • Less attention has been paid to making the most of small amounts of labeled data.
  • This study explores ways to exploit limited labeled data without additional data or model changes.
  • Experiments on six sentence classification datasets show the impact of different training strategies.
  • An integrated method is proposed that outperforms conventional approaches.

Plain English Explanation

Deep learning models often require large amounts of labeled data to perform well. However, in many real-world situations, only a small number of labeled samples may be available. To address this challenge, researchers have tried various approaches, such as redesigning model architectures or applying additional unlabeled data.

In this study, the researchers take a different approach. They assume a low-resource setting with only 30-100 labeled samples per class and explore how to make the most of this limited data without adding more samples or redesigning the model. They investigate three key aspects: training-validation splitting, early stopping, and weight initialization.

Through extensive experiments on six sentence classification datasets, the researchers found that the choice of approaches in these three areas can significantly impact performance metrics like accuracy, loss, and calibration error. Based on these results, they propose an integrated method that combines a weight averaging initialization with a "non-validation stop" training approach. This simple integrated method consistently outperforms conventional validation-based methods, achieving an average accuracy that is 1.8% higher across the six datasets.

Furthermore, the researchers show that their integrated method can also improve the performance of state-of-the-art models that use additional data or redesigned architectures, such as self-training and enhanced structural models.

These findings highlight the importance of the training strategy in low-resource settings and suggest that the integrated method can be a valuable first step when dealing with limited labeled data.

Technical Explanation

The researchers focused on a low-resource setting where only a small number of labeled samples (30-100 per class) are available. They explored three key aspects that could impact model performance in this scenario:

  1. Training-validation splitting: The researchers compared different approaches to splitting the limited labeled data into training and validation sets, including using a fixed validation set, using cross-validation, and not using a separate validation set at all.

  2. Early stopping: The researchers investigated different methods for determining when to stop training the model, including using a validation set, using a non-validation stop method, and training for a fixed number of epochs.

  3. Weight initialization: The researchers explored various weight initialization methods, including random initialization, pre-trained weights, and a weight averaging approach.

The researchers conducted extensive experiments on six public sentence classification datasets to evaluate the impact of these different approaches, both individually and in combination. They measured performance using various metrics, such as accuracy, loss, and calibration error.

Based on the experimental results, the researchers proposed an integrated method that combines a weight averaging initialization with a non-validation stop training approach. This simple integrated method consistently outperformed the conventional validation-based methods, achieving an average accuracy that was 1.8% higher across the six datasets.

Additionally, the researchers showed that their integrated method could further improve the performance of several state-of-the-art models that use additional data or redesigned architectures, such as self-training and enhanced structural models.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their study is limited to a specific low-resource setting with only 30-100 labeled samples per class. While this is a common scenario in many real-world applications, it may not be representative of all low-resource situations.

The researchers also note that their experiments were conducted on sentence classification tasks, and the generalizability of their findings to other types of machine learning problems (e.g., image classification, speech recognition) is not guaranteed. Further research would be needed to understand the broader applicability of their integrated method.

Additionally, the researchers did not explore the impact of different model architectures or hyperparameter tuning on the performance of their integrated method. It is possible that more complex models or more extensive hyperparameter optimization could lead to different results.

Despite these limitations, the researchers' findings provide valuable insights into the importance of the training strategy in low-resource settings. Their integrated method offers a simple and effective approach that could be a useful starting point for researchers and practitioners working with limited labeled data.

Conclusion

This study highlights the potential of leveraging small amounts of labeled data to improve deep learning performance in low-resource settings. The researchers' exploration of training-validation splitting, early stopping, and weight initialization strategies led to the development of an integrated method that consistently outperformed conventional validation-based approaches.

The researchers' findings suggest that careful attention to the training strategy can be a powerful tool for making the most of limited labeled data, even before applying additional data or redesigning model architectures. This insight could be particularly valuable in real-world applications where data is scarce but the need for accurate models is high.

Overall, this study provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing research on improving deep learning in low-resource settings. The researchers' empirical insights and the proposed integrated method offer a promising starting point for future work in this important area of machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

↗️

Total Score

0

Exploiting All Samples in Low-Resource Sentence Classification: Early Stopping and Initialization Parameters

Hongseok Choi, Hyunju Lee

To improve deep-learning performance in low-resource settings, many researchers have redesigned model architectures or applied additional data (e.g., external resources, unlabeled samples). However, there have been relatively few discussions on how to make good use of small amounts of labeled samples, although it is potentially beneficial and should be done before applying additional data or redesigning models. In this study, we assume a low-resource setting in which only a few labeled samples (i.e., 30-100 per class) are available, and we discuss how to exploit them without additional data or model redesigns. We explore possible approaches in the following three aspects: training-validation splitting, early stopping, and weight initialization. Extensive experiments are conducted on six public sentence classification datasets. Performance on various evaluation metrics (e.g., accuracy, loss, and calibration error) significantly varied depending on the approaches that were combined in the three aspects. Based on the results, we propose an integrated method, which is to initialize the model with a weight averaging method and use a non-validation stop method to train all samples. This simple integrated method consistently outperforms the competitive methods; e.g., the average accuracy of six datasets of this method was 1.8% higher than those of conventional validation-based methods. In addition, the integrated method further improves the performance when adapted to several state-of-the-art models that use additional data or redesign the network architecture (e.g., self-training and enhanced structural models). Our results highlight the importance of the training strategy and suggest that the integrated method can be the first step in the low-resource setting. This study provides empirical knowledge that will be helpful when dealing with low-resource data in future efforts.

Read more

7/26/2024

Total Score

1

Efficient Sentiment Analysis: A Resource-Aware Evaluation of Feature Extraction Techniques, Ensembling, and Deep Learning Models

Mahammed Kamruzzaman, Gene Louis Kim

While reaching for NLP systems that maximize accuracy, other important metrics of system performance are often overlooked. Prior models are easily forgotten despite their possible suitability in settings where large computing resources are unavailable or relatively more costly. In this paper, we perform a broad comparative evaluation of document-level sentiment analysis models with a focus on resource costs that are important for the feasibility of model deployment and general climate consciousness. Our experiments consider different feature extraction techniques, the effect of ensembling, task-specific deep learning modeling, and domain-independent large language models (LLMs). We find that while a fine-tuned LLM achieves the best accuracy, some alternate configurations provide huge (up to 24, 283 *) resource savings for a marginal (<1%) loss in accuracy. Furthermore, we find that for smaller datasets, the differences in accuracy shrink while the difference in resource consumption grows further.

Read more

4/19/2024

Don't Waste Your Time: Early Stopping Cross-Validation
Total Score

0

Don't Waste Your Time: Early Stopping Cross-Validation

Edward Bergman, Lennart Purucker, Frank Hutter

State-of-the-art automated machine learning systems for tabular data often employ cross-validation; ensuring that measured performances generalize to unseen data, or that subsequent ensembling does not overfit. However, using k-fold cross-validation instead of holdout validation drastically increases the computational cost of validating a single configuration. While ensuring better generalization and, by extension, better performance, the additional cost is often prohibitive for effective model selection within a time budget. We aim to make model selection with cross-validation more effective. Therefore, we study early stopping the process of cross-validation during model selection. We investigate the impact of early stopping on random search for two algorithms, MLP and random forest, across 36 classification datasets. We further analyze the impact of the number of folds by considering 3-, 5-, and 10-folds. In addition, we investigate the impact of early stopping with Bayesian optimization instead of random search and also repeated cross-validation. Our exploratory study shows that even a simple-to-understand and easy-to-implement method consistently allows model selection to converge faster; in ~94% of all datasets, on average by ~214%. Moreover, stopping cross-validation enables model selection to explore the search space more exhaustively by considering +167% configurations on average within one hour, while also obtaining better overall performance.

Read more

8/6/2024

Comparing Specialised Small and General Large Language Models on Text Classification: 100 Labelled Samples to Achieve Break-Even Performance
Total Score

0

Comparing Specialised Small and General Large Language Models on Text Classification: 100 Labelled Samples to Achieve Break-Even Performance

Branislav Pecher, Ivan Srba, Maria Bielikova

When solving NLP tasks with limited labelled data, researchers can either use a general large language model without further update, or use a small number of labelled examples to tune a specialised smaller model. In this work, we address the research gap of how many labelled samples are required for the specialised small models to outperform general large models, while taking the performance variance into consideration. By observing the behaviour of fine-tuning, instruction-tuning, prompting and in-context learning on 7 language models, we identify such performance break-even points across 8 representative text classification tasks of varying characteristics. We show that the specialised models often need only few samples (on average $10 - 1000$) to be on par or better than the general ones. At the same time, the number of required labels strongly depends on the dataset or task characteristics, with this number being significantly lower on multi-class datasets (up to $100$) than on binary datasets (up to $5000$). When performance variance is taken into consideration, the number of required labels increases on average by $100 - 200%$ and even up to $1500%$ in specific cases.

Read more

4/29/2024