Exploiting Diffusion Prior for Out-of-Distribution Detection
2406.11105
0
0
Abstract
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is crucial for deploying robust machine learning models, especially in areas where security is critical. However, traditional OOD detection methods often fail to capture complex data distributions from large scale date. In this paper, we present a novel approach for OOD detection that leverages the generative ability of diffusion models and the powerful feature extraction capabilities of CLIP. By using these features as conditional inputs to a diffusion model, we can reconstruct the images after encoding them with CLIP. The difference between the original and reconstructed images is used as a signal for OOD identification. The practicality and scalability of our method is increased by the fact that it does not require class-specific labeled ID data, as is the case with many other methods. Extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrates the robustness and effectiveness of our method, which have significantly improved the detection accuracy.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel approach to detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples using diffusion models, which are a type of generative model.
- The proposed method, called Exploiting Diffusion Prior for out-of-distribution detection, leverages the diffusion prior learned by the model to identify OOD samples.
- The paper also introduces a new benchmark dataset for OOD detection in Earth observation images, which the authors use to evaluate their approach.
Plain English Explanation
In machine learning, it's important to be able to detect when an input is outside the normal distribution of the data used to train a model. This is known as out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, and it's crucial for ensuring the model behaves robustly in real-world scenarios.
The authors of this paper propose a new way to tackle OOD detection using diffusion models. Diffusion models are a type of generative model that learns to transform simple random noise into realistic-looking data, like images. The key insight here is that the diffusion process itself contains information about the "normal" distribution of the data, and this can be used to identify OOD samples.
The authors' approach is to leverage the diffusion prior - the knowledge the model has acquired about the structure of the data during the diffusion process - to detect OOD samples. This is done by looking at how well the OOD sample fits the diffusion prior, with samples that don't fit well being identified as OOD.
To test their method, the authors created a new benchmark dataset of Earth observation images, which can be challenging for OOD detection due to the diversity of the data. They show that their diffusion-based approach outperforms other state-of-the-art OOD detection methods on this dataset, demonstrating the power of their technique.
Technical Explanation
The core idea behind the Exploiting Diffusion Prior for out-of-distribution detection method is to leverage the diffusion prior learned by a diffusion model to identify OOD samples. Diffusion models work by gradually transforming simple random noise into realistic-looking data through a series of noising and denoising steps. This process leads the model to learn a rich, structured representation of the data distribution.
The authors hypothesize that this diffusion prior contains valuable information about the "normal" distribution of the data, and that OOD samples will not fit well within this prior. To test this, they propose three different OOD detection metrics that capture different aspects of the diffusion process:
- Diffusion Log-Likelihood: This measures how well the OOD sample fits the diffusion prior by looking at the log-likelihood of the sample under the diffusion model.
- Diffusion Embedding Distance: This compares the embedding of the OOD sample to the embeddings of in-distribution samples at different stages of the diffusion process.
- Diffusion Energy Distance: This looks at the energy distance between the OOD sample and the distribution of in-distribution samples at different diffusion steps.
The authors evaluate their approach on a new benchmark dataset for OOD detection in Earth observation images, as well as on standard image classification datasets. They show that their diffusion-based methods outperform other state-of-the-art OOD detection techniques, such as Out-of-Distribution Detection Using a Single Unconditional Diffusion Model, Continual Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection, and Out-of-Distribution Detection Based on Subspace Projection.
Critical Analysis
The Exploiting Diffusion Prior for out-of-distribution detection paper presents a promising approach to OOD detection that leverages the rich structure learned by diffusion models. The authors' intuition that the diffusion prior contains valuable information about the "normal" data distribution is well-supported by the empirical results.
However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of this approach. For example, it's unclear how well the diffusion-based metrics would scale to high-dimensional or complex data distributions, or how sensitive they are to the specific architecture and hyperparameters of the diffusion model. Additionally, the authors' new benchmark dataset for Earth observation images, while valuable, may not capture the full diversity of real-world OOD scenarios.
Future research could explore ways to make the diffusion-based OOD detection more robust and generalizable, such as by incorporating subspace projection techniques or developing more sophisticated unsupervised OOD detection methods. It could also be interesting to investigate how these diffusion-based techniques compare to other approaches that leverage the "noise" in the data.
Conclusion
The Exploiting Diffusion Prior for out-of-distribution detection paper presents a novel and promising approach to OOD detection that leverages the rich structure learned by diffusion models. By tapping into the diffusion prior, the authors demonstrate that their method can effectively identify OOD samples, even in challenging datasets like Earth observation images.
While the paper offers a strong foundation, there is still room for further research to address potential limitations and make the approach more robust and generalizable. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the field of OOD detection, with potential applications in a wide range of machine learning systems that need to operate reliably in the real world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Detecting Out-Of-Distribution Earth Observation Images with Diffusion Models
Georges Le Bellier (CEDRIC - VERTIGO, CNAM), Nicolas Audebert (CEDRIC - VERTIGO, CNAM, IGN)
0
0
Earth Observation imagery can capture rare and unusual events, such as disasters and major landscape changes, whose visual appearance contrasts with the usual observations. Deep models trained on common remote sensing data will output drastically different features for these out-of-distribution samples, compared to those closer to their training dataset. Detecting them could therefore help anticipate changes in the observations, either geographical or environmental. In this work, we show that the reconstruction error of diffusion models can effectively serve as unsupervised out-of-distribution detectors for remote sensing images, using them as a plausibility score. Moreover, we introduce ODEED, a novel reconstruction-based scorer using the probability-flow ODE of diffusion models. We validate it experimentally on SpaceNet 8 with various scenarios, such as classical OOD detection with geographical shift and near-OOD setups: pre/post-flood and non-flooded/flooded image recognition. We show that our ODEED scorer significantly outperforms other diffusion-based and discriminative baselines on the more challenging near-OOD scenarios of flood image detection, where OOD images are close to the distribution tail. We aim to pave the way towards better use of generative models for anomaly detection in remote sensing.
4/22/2024
Out-of-Distribution Detection with a Single Unconditional Diffusion Model
Alvin Heng, Alexandre H. Thiery, Harold Soh
0
0
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a critical task in machine learning that seeks to identify abnormal samples. Traditionally, unsupervised methods utilize a deep generative model for OOD detection. However, such approaches necessitate a different model when evaluating abnormality against a new distribution. With the emergence of foundational generative models, this paper explores whether a single generalist model can also perform OOD detection across diverse tasks. To that end, we introduce our method, Diffusion Paths, (DiffPath) in this work. DiffPath proposes to utilize a single diffusion model originally trained to perform unconditional generation for OOD detection. Specifically, we introduce a novel technique of measuring the rate-of-change and curvature of the diffusion paths connecting samples to the standard normal. Extensive experiments show that with a single model, DiffPath outperforms prior work on a variety of OOD tasks involving different distributions. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/clear-nus/diffpath.
5/21/2024
Continual Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection
Lars Doorenbos, Raphael Sznitman, Pablo M'arquez-Neila
0
0
Deep learning models excel when the data distribution during training aligns with testing data. Yet, their performance diminishes when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, leading to great interest in the field of OOD detection. Current approaches typically assume that OOD samples originate from an unconcentrated distribution complementary to the training distribution. While this assumption is appropriate in the traditional unsupervised OOD (U-OOD) setting, it proves inadequate when considering the place of deployment of the underlying deep learning model. To better reflect this real-world scenario, we introduce the novel setting of continual U-OOD detection. To tackle this new setting, we propose a method that starts from a U-OOD detector, which is agnostic to the OOD distribution, and slowly updates during deployment to account for the actual OOD distribution. Our method uses a new U-OOD scoring function that combines the Mahalanobis distance with a nearest-neighbor approach. Furthermore, we design a confidence-scaled few-shot OOD detector that outperforms previous methods. We show our method greatly improves upon strong baselines from related fields.
6/5/2024
🔎
Out-of-distribution detection based on subspace projection of high-dimensional features output by the last convolutional layer
Qiuyu Zhu, Yiwei He
0
0
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, crucial for reliable pattern classification, discerns whether a sample originates outside the training distribution. This paper concentrates on the high-dimensional features output by the final convolutional layer, which contain rich image features. Our key idea is to project these high-dimensional features into two specific feature subspaces, leveraging the dimensionality reduction capacity of the network's linear layers, trained with Predefined Evenly-Distribution Class Centroids (PEDCC)-Loss. This involves calculating the cosines of three projection angles and the norm values of features, thereby identifying distinctive information for in-distribution (ID) and OOD data, which assists in OOD detection. Building upon this, we have modified the batch normalization (BN) and ReLU layer preceding the fully connected layer, diminishing their impact on the output feature distributions and thereby widening the distribution gap between ID and OOD data features. Our method requires only the training of the classification network model, eschewing any need for input pre-processing or specific OOD data pre-tuning. Extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrates that our approach delivers state-of-the-art performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/Hewell0/ProjOOD.
5/6/2024