Continual Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection
2406.02327
0
0
Abstract
Deep learning models excel when the data distribution during training aligns with testing data. Yet, their performance diminishes when faced with out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, leading to great interest in the field of OOD detection. Current approaches typically assume that OOD samples originate from an unconcentrated distribution complementary to the training distribution. While this assumption is appropriate in the traditional unsupervised OOD (U-OOD) setting, it proves inadequate when considering the place of deployment of the underlying deep learning model. To better reflect this real-world scenario, we introduce the novel setting of continual U-OOD detection. To tackle this new setting, we propose a method that starts from a U-OOD detector, which is agnostic to the OOD distribution, and slowly updates during deployment to account for the actual OOD distribution. Our method uses a new U-OOD scoring function that combines the Mahalanobis distance with a nearest-neighbor approach. Furthermore, we design a confidence-scaled few-shot OOD detector that outperforms previous methods. We show our method greatly improves upon strong baselines from related fields.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach for continual unsupervised out-of-distribution (OOD) detection.
- The method aims to continuously learn to identify OOD samples without access to labeled data.
- It leverages self-supervised learning and adversarial training techniques to build a robust OOD detector.
Plain English Explanation
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is the task of identifying data samples that are significantly different from the training data. This is an important problem in machine learning, as models can struggle with inputs they haven't seen before. Toward a Realistic Benchmark for OOD Detection and Gradient-Regularized OOD Detection have explored ways to improve OOD detection.
In this paper, the authors tackle the challenge of continual OOD detection - the ability to continuously learn to identify OOD samples without access to labeled data. They propose a method that uses self-supervised learning and adversarial training to build a robust OOD detector. Self-supervised learning allows the model to learn useful features from the data without labels, while adversarial training helps the model become more resilient to unusual or deceptive inputs.
The key idea is to train the model to distinguish in-distribution data from out-of-distribution data in an unsupervised way, continuously expanding its knowledge as it sees more data. This could be useful in real-world applications where the data distribution is constantly changing, and the model needs to adapt without human intervention.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a continual unsupervised OOD detection framework that consists of two main components: a self-supervised learning module and an OOD detection module.
The self-supervised learning module uses contrastive learning to learn useful representations from the data without labels. It encourages the model to learn features that can distinguish between different in-distribution samples, which can help it better identify OOD samples later on.
The OOD detection module uses adversarial training to build a robust OOD detector. It trains the model to classify in-distribution and OOD samples, and also to generate adversarial examples that challenge the OOD detector. This adversarial training process helps the model become more resilient to unusual or deceptive inputs.
The two modules are trained together in a continual fashion, with the OOD detector continuously updating its knowledge as it sees more data. This allows the system to adapt to changes in the data distribution over time, without the need for human supervision.
The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets and show that it outperforms existing unsupervised OOD detection methods, particularly in scenarios where the data distribution shifts over time.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to the challenging problem of continual unsupervised OOD detection. The use of self-supervised learning and adversarial training techniques is well-justified and the experimental results are compelling.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For example, it is unclear how the method would perform in scenarios where the OOD data is very different from the in-distribution data, or where there are multiple, distinct OOD distributions. OOD Detection in Medical Image Analysis: A Survey has explored some of these challenges in the medical domain.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational and memory requirements of the proposed framework, which could be a concern for real-world deployment. The Learnability of OOD Detection has examined the theoretical limits of OOD detection from a learning-theoretic perspective.
Overall, the research presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of OOD detection, but further investigation is needed to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and practical implications of the approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel continual unsupervised OOD detection framework that combines self-supervised learning and adversarial training techniques. The key innovation is the ability to continuously learn to identify OOD samples without access to labeled data, which could be highly useful in real-world applications where the data distribution is constantly evolving.
The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, but the paper also highlights the need for further research to address potential limitations and explore the broader applicability of the method. As the field of OOD detection continues to evolve, View-Specific Out-of-Distribution Identification from Statistical Testing and other related advancements will be important for advancing our understanding and practical deployment of these techniques.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Toward a Realistic Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detection
Pietro Recalcati, Fabio Garcea, Luca Piano, Fabrizio Lamberti, Lia Morra
0
0
Deep neural networks are increasingly used in a wide range of technologies and services, but remain highly susceptible to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, that is, drawn from a different distribution than the original training set. A common approach to address this issue is to endow deep neural networks with the ability to detect OOD samples. Several benchmarks have been proposed to design and validate OOD detection techniques. However, many of them are based on far-OOD samples drawn from very different distributions, and thus lack the complexity needed to capture the nuances of real-world scenarios. In this work, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark for OOD detection, based on ImageNet and Places365, that assigns individual classes as in-distribution or out-of-distribution depending on the semantic similarity with the training set. Several techniques can be used to determine which classes should be considered in-distribution, yielding benchmarks with varying properties. Experimental results on different OOD detection techniques show how their measured efficacy depends on the selected benchmark and how confidence-based techniques may outperform classifier-based ones on near-OOD samples.
4/17/2024
Gradient-Regularized Out-of-Distribution Detection
Sina Sharifi, Taha Entesari, Bardia Safaei, Vishal M. Patel, Mahyar Fazlyab
0
0
One of the challenges for neural networks in real-life applications is the overconfident errors these models make when the data is not from the original training distribution. Addressing this issue is known as Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection. Many state-of-the-art OOD methods employ an auxiliary dataset as a surrogate for OOD data during training to achieve improved performance. However, these methods fail to fully exploit the local information embedded in the auxiliary dataset. In this work, we propose the idea of leveraging the information embedded in the gradient of the loss function during training to enable the network to not only learn a desired OOD score for each sample but also to exhibit similar behavior in a local neighborhood around each sample. We also develop a novel energy-based sampling method to allow the network to be exposed to more informative OOD samples during the training phase. This is especially important when the auxiliary dataset is large. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through extensive experiments on several OOD benchmarks, improving the existing state-of-the-art FPR95 by 4% on our ImageNet experiment. We further provide a theoretical analysis through the lens of certified robustness and Lipschitz analysis to showcase the theoretical foundation of our work. We will publicly release our code after the review process.
4/24/2024
Out-of-distribution Detection in Medical Image Analysis: A survey
Zesheng Hong, Yubiao Yue, Yubin Chen, Huanjie Lin, Yuanmei Luo, Mini Han Wang, Weidong Wang, Jialong Xu, Xiaoqi Yang, Zhenzhang Li, Sihong Xie
0
0
Computer-aided diagnostics has benefited from the development of deep learning-based computer vision techniques in these years. Traditional supervised deep learning methods assume that the test sample is drawn from the identical distribution as the training data. However, it is possible to encounter out-of-distribution samples in real-world clinical scenarios, which may cause silent failure in deep learning-based medical image analysis tasks. Recently, research has explored various out-of-distribution (OOD) detection situations and techniques to enable a trustworthy medical AI system. In this survey, we systematically review the recent advances in OOD detection in medical image analysis. We first explore several factors that may cause a distributional shift when using a deep-learning-based model in clinic scenarios, with three different types of distributional shift well defined on top of these factors. Then a framework is suggested to categorize and feature existing solutions, while the previous studies are reviewed based on the methodology taxonomy. Our discussion also includes evaluation protocols and metrics, as well as the challenge and a research direction lack of exploration.
4/30/2024
On the Learnability of Out-of-distribution Detection
Zhen Fang, Yixuan Li, Feng Liu, Bo Han, Jie Lu
0
0
Supervised learning aims to train a classifier under the assumption that training and test data are from the same distribution. To ease the above assumption, researchers have studied a more realistic setting: out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, where test data may come from classes that are unknown during training (i.e., OOD data). Due to the unavailability and diversity of OOD data, good generalization ability is crucial for effective OOD detection algorithms, and corresponding learning theory is still an open problem. To study the generalization of OOD detection, this paper investigates the probably approximately correct (PAC) learning theory of OOD detection that fits the commonly used evaluation metrics in the literature. First, we find a necessary condition for the learnability of OOD detection. Then, using this condition, we prove several impossibility theorems for the learnability of OOD detection under some scenarios. Although the impossibility theorems are frustrating, we find that some conditions of these impossibility theorems may not hold in some practical scenarios. Based on this observation, we next give several necessary and sufficient conditions to characterize the learnability of OOD detection in some practical scenarios. Lastly, we offer theoretical support for representative OOD detection works based on our OOD theory.
4/9/2024