Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Markets
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes "explore-then-commit" algorithms for decentralized two-sided matching markets, where agents on both sides (e.g., workers and employers) aim to find optimal matches.
- The algorithms allow agents to independently explore potential matches, then commit to a final match in a decentralized fashion without centralized coordination.
- The authors analyze the theoretical properties of these algorithms, including their convergence to stable matchings and the rate of convergence.
- They also demonstrate the algorithms' performance through simulations, showing they can achieve high match quality with less coordination compared to traditional centralized approaches.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world scenarios, people or organizations need to find optimal pairings or "matches" between two groups. For example, companies might want to hire the best employees, while job seekers want to find the most suitable roles. These are known as "two-sided matching markets."
Traditional matching algorithms often rely on a centralized authority to coordinate the process and make the final decisions. However, this can be impractical or undesirable in decentralized settings where agents (e.g., companies and job seekers) want to make their own choices independently.
The researchers in this paper propose a new class of "explore-then-commit" algorithms that allow agents to explore potential matches on their own, and then independently commit to a final match without the need for a central coordinator. This decentralized approach can be more efficient and flexible than traditional centralized methods.
The key idea is that agents first spend some time "exploring" different potential matches, learning about their preferences and options. They then "commit" to a final match, using the information they gathered during the exploration phase. The researchers show that these algorithms can reliably converge to stable matchings - outcomes where no agent has an incentive to change their match - and they analyze how quickly this convergence occurs.
Through simulations, the researchers demonstrate that their explore-then-commit algorithms can achieve high-quality matches while requiring less coordination than traditional centralized approaches. This suggests the potential for these algorithms to be useful in real-world decentralized matching markets, where agents want to make their own autonomous decisions.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel class of "explore-then-commit" algorithms for decentralized two-sided matching markets. In these markets, agents on both sides (e.g., workers and employers) aim to find optimal matches with one another.
The key features of the explore-then-commit algorithms are:
-
Exploration Phase: Agents independently explore potential matches, gathering information about their preferences and options without centralized coordination.
-
Commitment Phase: After the exploration phase, agents independently commit to a final match using the information they collected.
The researchers analyze the theoretical properties of these algorithms, including:
-
Convergence to Stable Matchings: They prove that the explore-then-commit algorithms are guaranteed to converge to stable matchings, where no agent has an incentive to change their match.
-
Convergence Rate: They characterize the rate of convergence to stable matchings, showing that it depends on factors like the exploration budget and the structure of agent preferences.
Through numerical simulations, the authors demonstrate that their explore-then-commit algorithms can achieve high-quality matches while requiring less coordination than traditional centralized approaches. This suggests the potential for these algorithms to be useful in real-world decentralized matching markets, where agents want to make autonomous decisions.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to decentralized matching markets, addressing an important practical challenge. The explore-then-commit algorithms offer a novel way to achieve stable matchings without the need for a centralized coordinator, which can be beneficial in many real-world scenarios.
One potential limitation is the reliance on certain assumptions, such as the availability of cardinal utility functions and the ability of agents to accurately estimate their own preferences. In practice, agents may face uncertainty or have difficulty quantifying their preferences, which could impact the performance of the algorithms.
Additionally, the analysis of convergence rate focuses on specific preference structures and exploration budgets. It would be valuable to further explore the algorithms' behavior under a wider range of conditions, including more complex preference distributions and varying exploration strategies.
Another area for further research could be the robustness of the explore-then-commit algorithms to strategic manipulation by agents. While the authors mention the stability property, it would be important to understand how the algorithms perform when agents have incentives to misrepresent their preferences or exploration results.
Overall, the paper presents a promising approach to decentralized matching markets and opens up several interesting directions for future research, such as addressing practical limitations and exploring more diverse market conditions.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel class of "explore-then-commit" algorithms for decentralized two-sided matching markets. These algorithms allow agents on both sides of the market to independently explore potential matches, then commit to a final match without the need for centralized coordination.
The key theoretical contributions of the paper include proving the convergence of these algorithms to stable matchings and characterizing their convergence rate. The researchers also demonstrate through simulations that their explore-then-commit algorithms can achieve high-quality matches with less coordination than traditional centralized approaches.
The potential impact of this work lies in its ability to enable more flexible and autonomous decision-making in real-world matching markets, where agents may prefer to make their own choices rather than deferring to a central authority. This could lead to improved match quality and efficiency in a variety of domains, from labor markets to college admissions to organ donation.
While the paper presents a compelling foundation, further research is needed to address practical limitations and explore a wider range of market conditions. Nevertheless, the explore-then-commit algorithms represent an important step forward in the field of decentralized matching, with promising implications for both theory and practice.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Markets
Tejas Pagare, Avishek Ghosh
Online learning in a decentralized two-sided matching markets, where the demand-side (players) compete to match with the supply-side (arms), has received substantial interest because it abstracts out the complex interactions in matching platforms (e.g. UpWork, TaskRabbit). However, past works assume that each arm knows their preference ranking over the players (one-sided learning), and each player aim to learn the preference over arms through successive interactions. Moreover, several (impractical) assumptions on the problem are usually made for theoretical tractability such as broadcast player-arm match Liu et al. (2020; 2021); Kong & Li (2023) or serial dictatorship Sankararaman et al. (2021); Basu et al. (2021); Ghosh et al. (2022). In this paper, we study a decentralized two-sided matching market, where we do not assume that the preference ranking over players are known to the arms apriori. Furthermore, we do not have any structural assumptions on the problem. We propose a multi-phase explore-then-commit type algorithm namely epoch-based CA-ETC (collision avoidance explore then commit) (texttt{CA-ETC} in short) for this problem that does not require any communication across agents (players and arms) and hence decentralized. We show that for the initial epoch length of $T_{circ}$ and subsequent epoch-lengths of $2^{l/gamma} T_{circ}$ (for the $l-$th epoch with $gamma in (0,1)$ as an input parameter to the algorithm), texttt{CA-ETC} yields a player optimal expected regret of $mathcal{O}left(T_{circ} (frac{K log T}{T_{circ} Delta^2})^{1/gamma} + T_{circ} (frac{T}{T_{circ}})^gammaright)$ for the $i$-th player, where $T$ is the learning horizon, $K$ is the number of arms and $Delta$ is an appropriately defined problem gap. Furthermore, we propose a blackboard communication based baseline achieving logarithmic regret in $T$.
Read more8/19/2024
🤯
0
Improved Bandits in Many-to-one Matching Markets with Incentive Compatibility
Fang Kong, Shuai Li
Two-sided matching markets have been widely studied in the literature due to their rich applications. Since participants are usually uncertain about their preferences, online algorithms have recently been adopted to learn them through iterative interactions. An existing work initiates the study of this problem in a many-to-one setting with responsiveness. However, their results are far from optimal and lack guarantees of incentive compatibility. We first extend an existing algorithm for the one-to-one setting to this more general setting and show it achieves a near-optimal bound for player-optimal regret. Nevertheless, due to the substantial requirement for collaboration, a single player's deviation could lead to a huge increase in its own cumulative rewards and a linear regret for others. In this paper, we aim to enhance the regret bound in many-to-one markets while ensuring incentive compatibility. We first propose the adaptively explore-then-deferred-acceptance (AETDA) algorithm for responsiveness setting and derive an upper bound for player-optimal stable regret while demonstrating its guarantee of incentive compatibility. To the best of our knowledge, it constitutes the first polynomial player-optimal guarantee in matching markets that offers such robust assurances without known $Delta$, where $Delta$ is some preference gap among players and arms. We also consider broader substitutable preferences, one of the most general conditions to ensure the existence of a stable matching and cover responsiveness. We devise an online DA (ODA) algorithm and establish an upper bound for the player-pessimal stable regret for this setting.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandits with Stochastic Sharable Arm Capacities
Hong Xie, Jinyu Mo, Defu Lian, Jie Wang, Enhong Chen
Motivated by distributed selection problems, we formulate a new variant of multi-player multi-armed bandit (MAB) model, which captures stochastic arrival of requests to each arm, as well as the policy of allocating requests to players. The challenge is how to design a distributed learning algorithm such that players select arms according to the optimal arm pulling profile (an arm pulling profile prescribes the number of players at each arm) without communicating to each other. We first design a greedy algorithm, which locates one of the optimal arm pulling profiles with a polynomial computational complexity. We also design an iterative distributed algorithm for players to commit to an optimal arm pulling profile with a constant number of rounds in expectation. We apply the explore then commit (ETC) framework to address the online setting when model parameters are unknown. We design an exploration strategy for players to estimate the optimal arm pulling profile. Since such estimates can be different across different players, it is challenging for players to commit. We then design an iterative distributed algorithm, which guarantees that players can arrive at a consensus on the optimal arm pulling profile in only M rounds. We conduct experiments to validate our algorithm.
Read more8/21/2024
🐍
0
Decentralized and Uncoordinated Learning of Stable Matchings: A Game-Theoretic Approach
S. Rasoul Etesami, R. Srikant
We consider the problem of learning stable matchings with unknown preferences in a decentralized and uncoordinated manner, where decentralized means that players make decisions individually without the influence of a central platform, and uncoordinated means that players do not need to synchronize their decisions using pre-specified rules. First, we provide a game formulation for this problem with known preferences, where the set of pure Nash equilibria (NE) coincides with the set of stable matchings, and mixed NE can be rounded to a stable matching. Then, we show that for hierarchical markets, applying the exponential weight (EXP) learning algorithm to the stable matching game achieves logarithmic regret in a fully decentralized and uncoordinated fashion. Moreover, we show that EXP converges locally and exponentially fast to a stable matching in general markets. We also introduce another decentralized and uncoordinated learning algorithm that globally converges to a stable matching with arbitrarily high probability. Finally, we provide stronger feedback conditions under which it is possible to drive the market faster toward an approximate stable matching. Our proposed game-theoretic framework bridges the discrete problem of learning stable matchings with the problem of learning NE in continuous-action games.
Read more8/16/2024