Exploring Commonalities in Explanation Frameworks: A Multi-Domain Survey Analysis
2405.11958
0
0
Abstract
This study presents insights gathered from surveys and discussions with specialists in three domains, aiming to find essential elements for a universal explanation framework that could be applied to these and other similar use cases. The insights are incorporated into a software tool that utilizes GP algorithms, known for their interpretability. The applications analyzed include a medical scenario (involving predictive ML), a retail use case (involving prescriptive ML), and an energy use case (also involving predictive ML). We interviewed professionals from each sector, transcribing their conversations for further analysis. Additionally, experts and non-experts in these fields filled out questionnaires designed to probe various dimensions of explanatory methods. The findings indicate a universal preference for sacrificing a degree of accuracy in favor of greater explainability. Additionally, we highlight the significance of feature importance and counterfactual explanations as critical components of such a framework. Our questionnaires are publicly available to facilitate the dissemination of knowledge in the field of XAI.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper surveys and analyzes commonalities across various explanation frameworks used in different domains, such as machine learning, natural language processing, and decision-making systems.
- The researchers aimed to identify shared principles, characteristics, and design considerations that underlie effective explanation frameworks, with the goal of informing the development of more robust and generalizable explanation approaches.
Plain English Explanation
Explanation frameworks are systems that help people understand how complex models or algorithms arrive at their outputs or decisions. These frameworks are used in many different fields, from machine learning to natural language processing to decision-making systems.
In this paper, the researchers looked at a variety of these explanation frameworks and tried to find common themes or principles that they all share. The idea was to identify the key characteristics that make some explanation frameworks more effective than others, regardless of the specific domain they're used in.
By understanding these shared elements, the researchers hope to guide the development of future explanation frameworks that are more robust, reliable, and applicable across a wide range of applications. This could help make these systems more transparent and trustworthy for the people using them.
Some of the key [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/understanding-data-understanding-framework-to-navigate-intricacies]explanation frameworks[/internal link] the researchers analyzed include [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/explainablefair-framework-prediction-substance-use-disorder-treatment]ExplainableFair[/internal link], [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/solving-enigma-deriving-optimal-explanations-deep-networks]Solving the Enigma[/internal link], [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/t-explainer-model-agnostic-explainability-framework-based]T-Explainer[/internal link], and [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-explainable-recommendation]Robust Explainable Recommendation[/internal link]. By looking at the similarities and differences between these frameworks, the researchers hope to uncover insights that can improve explanation capabilities across a wide range of applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the related work in the field of explanation frameworks, highlighting the growing importance of explainable AI systems and the need for more generalizable approaches.
The researchers then conducted a multi-domain survey analysis, examining a diverse set of explanation frameworks across machine learning, natural language processing, and decision-making applications. They identified several key commonalities in the design and characteristics of these frameworks, including:
- Explanatory Scope: The extent to which a framework can provide insights into the inner workings of a model or system, ranging from feature importance to more detailed causal explanations.
- Explanatory Granularity: The level of detail and specificity in the explanations provided, from high-level summaries to fine-grained, step-by-step breakdowns.
- Explanatory Fidelity: The degree to which the explanations accurately reflect the true decision-making process of the underlying model or system.
- Explanatory Transparency: The clarity and interpretability of the explanation, including the use of natural language, visualizations, or other user-friendly formats.
The paper also discusses the trade-offs and design considerations involved in balancing these different aspects of explanation frameworks, as well as the potential challenges and limitations in developing more generalized, cross-domain approaches.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge the inherent complexity and context-dependence of explanation frameworks, noting that the optimal design and characteristics may vary depending on the specific application and user needs. They also highlight the potential for bias and gaming of explanation systems, which could undermine their trustworthiness and reliability.
One potential area for further research is the impact of different explanation frameworks on user understanding and decision-making. While the paper examines the technical characteristics of these frameworks, it does not delve deeply into their real-world effectiveness and impact on end-users.
Additionally, the survey analysis is limited to a relatively small set of frameworks, and there may be other relevant approaches that were not included. Expanding the scope of the analysis could yield additional insights and identify a more comprehensive set of design principles.
Overall, the paper provides a valuable contribution to the growing field of explainable AI by highlighting the common threads across diverse explanation frameworks and the key considerations in developing more robust and generalizable approaches. However, further research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and user-centric aspects of these systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a multi-domain survey analysis of various explanation frameworks, aiming to uncover the shared principles and design characteristics that underlie effective explanation systems. By identifying commonalities across frameworks used in machine learning, natural language processing, and decision-making applications, the researchers hope to inform the development of more robust and generalizable approaches to explainable AI.
The key insights from the analysis include the importance of balancing explanatory scope, granularity, fidelity, and transparency, as well as the inherent trade-offs and contextual factors that must be considered in designing effective explanation frameworks. While the paper provides a valuable starting point, further research is needed to fully understand the real-world impact and user-centric aspects of these systems.
Overall, this work contributes to the growing field of explainable AI by highlighting the shared foundations of various explanation frameworks and the need for more holistic, cross-domain approaches to making complex systems more transparent and trustworthy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧪
Towards a Unified Framework for Evaluating Explanations
Juan D. Pinto, Luc Paquette
0
0
The challenge of creating interpretable models has been taken up by two main research communities: ML researchers primarily focused on lower-level explainability methods that suit the needs of engineers, and HCI researchers who have more heavily emphasized user-centered approaches often based on participatory design methods. This paper reviews how these communities have evaluated interpretability, identifying overlaps and semantic misalignments. We propose moving towards a unified framework of evaluation criteria and lay the groundwork for such a framework by articulating the relationships between existing criteria. We argue that explanations serve as mediators between models and stakeholders, whether for intrinsically interpretable models or opaque black-box models analyzed via post-hoc techniques. We further argue that useful explanations require both faithfulness and intelligibility. Explanation plausibility is a prerequisite for intelligibility, while stability is a prerequisite for explanation faithfulness. We illustrate these criteria, as well as specific evaluation methods, using examples from an ongoing study of an interpretable neural network for predicting a particular learner behavior.
5/24/2024
👁️
An explainable three dimension framework to uncover learning patterns: A unified look in variable sulci recognition
Michail Mamalakis, Heloise de Vareilles, Atheer AI-Manea, Samantha C. Mitchell, Ingrid Arartz, Lynn Egeland Morch-Johnsen, Jane Garrison, Jon Simons, Pietro Lio, John Suckling, Graham Murray
0
0
Detecting the significant features of the learning process of an artificial intelligence framework in the entire training and validation dataset can be determined as 'global' explanations. Studies in the literature lack of accurate, low-complexity, and three-dimensional (3D) global explanations which are crucial in neuroimaging, a field with a complex representational space that demands more than basic two-dimensional interpretations. To fill this gap, we developed a novel explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) 3D-Framework that provides robust, faithful, and low-complexity global explanations. We evaluated our framework on various 3D deep learning networks trained, validated, and tested on a well-annotated cohort of 596 subjects from the TOP-OSLO study. The focus was on the presence and absence of the paracingulate sulcus, a variable feature of brain morphology correlated with psychotic conditions. Our proposed 3D-Framework outperforms traditional XAI methods in terms of faithfulness for global explanations. As a result, we were able to use these robust explanations to uncover new patterns that not only enhance the credibility and reliability of the training process but also reveal promising new biomarkers and significantly related sub-regions. For the first time, our developed 3D-Framework proposes a way for the scientific community to utilize global explanations to discover novel patterns in this specific neuroscientific application and beyond. This study can helps improve the trustworthiness of AI training processes and push the boundaries of our understanding by revealing new patterns in neuroscience and beyond.
6/11/2024
🤔
Understanding Data Understanding: A Framework to Navigate the Intricacies of Data Analytics
Joshua Holstein, Philipp Spitzer, Marieke Hoell, Michael Vossing, Niklas Kuhl
0
0
As organizations face the challenges of processing exponentially growing data volumes, their reliance on analytics to unlock value from this data has intensified. However, the intricacies of big data, such as its extensive feature sets, pose significant challenges. A crucial step in leveraging this data for insightful analysis is an in-depth understanding of both the data and its domain. Yet, existing literature presents a fragmented picture of what comprises an effective understanding of data and domain, varying significantly in depth and focus. To address this research gap, we conduct a systematic literature review, aiming to delineate the dimensions of data understanding. We identify five dimensions: Foundations, Collection & Selection, Contextualization & Integration, Exploration & Discovery, and Insights. These dimensions collectively form a comprehensive framework for data understanding, providing guidance for organizations seeking meaningful insights from complex datasets. This study synthesizes the current state of knowledge and lays the groundwork for further exploration.
5/14/2024
An ExplainableFair Framework for Prediction of Substance Use Disorder Treatment Completion
Mary M. Lucas, Xiaoyang Wang, Chia-Hsuan Chang, Christopher C. Yang, Jacqueline E. Braughton, Quyen M. Ngo
0
0
Fairness of machine learning models in healthcare has drawn increasing attention from clinicians, researchers, and even at the highest level of government. On the other hand, the importance of developing and deploying interpretable or explainable models has been demonstrated, and is essential to increasing the trustworthiness and likelihood of adoption of these models. The objective of this study was to develop and implement a framework for addressing both these issues - fairness and explainability. We propose an explainable fairness framework, first developing a model with optimized performance, and then using an in-processing approach to mitigate model biases relative to the sensitive attributes of race and sex. We then explore and visualize explanations of the model changes that lead to the fairness enhancement process through exploring the changes in importance of features. Our resulting-fairness enhanced models retain high sensitivity with improved fairness and explanations of the fairness-enhancement that may provide helpful insights for healthcare providers to guide clinical decision-making and resource allocation.
4/8/2024