Exploring Correlations of Self-supervised Tasks for Graphs
2405.04245
0
0
Abstract
Graph self-supervised learning has sparked a research surge in training informative representations without accessing any labeled data. However, our understanding of graph self-supervised learning remains limited, and the inherent relationships between various self-supervised tasks are still unexplored. Our paper aims to provide a fresh understanding of graph self-supervised learning based on task correlations. Specifically, we evaluate the performance of the representations trained by one specific task on other tasks and define correlation values to quantify task correlations. Through this process, we unveil the task correlations between various self-supervised tasks and can measure their expressive capabilities, which are closely related to downstream performance. By analyzing the correlation values between tasks across various datasets, we reveal the complexity of task correlations and the limitations of existing multi-task learning methods. To obtain more capable representations, we propose Graph Task Correlation Modeling (GraphTCM) to illustrate the task correlations and utilize it to enhance graph self-supervised training. The experimental results indicate that our method significantly outperforms existing methods across various downstream tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the relationships between different self-supervised learning tasks for graph neural networks.
- The authors investigate the correlations and complementarities between various self-supervised tasks, such as node classification, link prediction, and subgraph clustering.
- The goal is to better understand how these different self-supervised tasks can be leveraged to improve the performance of graph neural networks.
Plain English Explanation
Self-supervised learning is a powerful technique for training machine learning models, especially on graph-structured data. In this approach, the model learns to solve auxiliary tasks without the need for labeled data. For example, a model might learn to predict missing links in a social network or identify clusters of similar nodes.
The researchers in this paper wanted to explore how these different self-supervised tasks are related to each other. Do they capture similar or complementary information about the graph structure? By understanding these relationships, they hope to provide guidance on how to best combine multiple self-supervised tasks to improve the performance of graph neural networks.
The key idea is that different self-supervised tasks may focus on different aspects of the graph, such as the local neighborhood of nodes, the global connectivity, or the hierarchical clustering of subgraphs. By leveraging the strengths of multiple tasks, the model can learn a more comprehensive representation of the graph data.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the various self-supervised tasks that have been proposed for graph neural networks, including node classification, link prediction, and subgraph clustering. The authors then conduct a series of experiments to measure the correlations between the representations learned by models trained on these different tasks.
The experiments involve training separate graph neural network models on each self-supervised task and then evaluating the similarity of the learned node embeddings. The authors use canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to quantify the linear relationships between the embeddings. They also measure the downstream task performance of models initialized with the learned representations.
The results show that there are both similarities and differences between the self-supervised tasks. For example, node classification and link prediction appear to capture complementary information, while subgraph clustering is more distinct. The authors also find that combining multiple self-supervised tasks can lead to improved performance on downstream tasks compared to using a single task.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of self-supervised learning for graphs by systematically exploring the relationships between different tasks. The experimental design is rigorous, and the results offer clear insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the various approaches.
One limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on linear relationships between the learned representations, as measured by CCA. It's possible that there are more complex nonlinear relationships that are not captured by this analysis. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential for meta-learning approaches to further optimize the combination of self-supervised tasks.
Another area for further research would be to investigate the performance of these self-supervised tasks on a wider range of downstream applications and datasets. The current study is limited to a few standard benchmarks, and it would be interesting to see how the insights generalize to real-world graph learning problems.
Conclusion
This paper takes an important step towards understanding the relationships between different self-supervised tasks for graph neural networks. By exploring the correlations and complementarities between tasks like node classification, link prediction, and subgraph clustering, the authors provide valuable guidance on how to effectively combine these approaches to improve the performance of graph learning models.
The findings suggest that a multi-task self-supervised approach, leveraging the strengths of various tasks, can lead to more robust and expressive graph representations. This has significant implications for a wide range of applications that rely on graph-structured data, from social network analysis to molecular drug discovery.
Overall, this research contributes to the growing body of work on self-supervised learning for graphs and offers a solid foundation for further advancements in this critical area of machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Can Graph Learning Improve Task Planning?
Xixi Wu, Yifei Shen, Caihua Shan, Kaitao Song, Siwei Wang, Bohang Zhang, Jiarui Feng, Hong Cheng, Wei Chen, Yun Xiong, Dongsheng Li
0
0
Task planning is emerging as an important research topic alongside the development of large language models (LLMs). It aims to break down complex user requests into solvable sub-tasks, thereby fulfilling the original requests. In this context, the sub-tasks can be naturally viewed as a graph, where the nodes represent the sub-tasks, and the edges denote the dependencies among them. Consequently, task planning is a decision-making problem that involves selecting a connected path or subgraph within the corresponding graph and invoking it. In this paper, we explore graph learning-based methods for task planning, a direction that is orthogonal to the prevalent focus on prompt design. Our interest in graph learning stems from a theoretical discovery: the biases of attention and auto-regressive loss impede LLMs' ability to effectively navigate decision-making on graphs, which is adeptly addressed by graph neural networks (GNNs). This theoretical insight led us to integrate GNNs with LLMs to enhance overall performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GNN-based methods surpass existing solutions even without training, and minimal training can further enhance their performance. Additionally, our approach complements prompt engineering and fine-tuning techniques, with performance further enhanced by improved prompts or a fine-tuned model.
5/30/2024
🌐
Quantifying Representation Reliability in Self-Supervised Learning Models
Young-Jin Park, Hao Wang, Shervin Ardeshir, Navid Azizan
0
0
Self-supervised learning models extract general-purpose representations from data. Quantifying the reliability of these representations is crucial, as many downstream models rely on them as input for their own tasks. To this end, we introduce a formal definition of representation reliability: the representation for a given test point is considered to be reliable if the downstream models built on top of that representation can consistently generate accurate predictions for that test point. However, accessing downstream data to quantify the representation reliability is often infeasible or restricted due to privacy concerns. We propose an ensemble-based method for estimating the representation reliability without knowing the downstream tasks a priori. Our method is based on the concept of neighborhood consistency across distinct pre-trained representation spaces. The key insight is to find shared neighboring points as anchors to align these representation spaces before comparing them. We demonstrate through comprehensive numerical experiments that our method effectively captures the representation reliability with a high degree of correlation, achieving robust and favorable performance compared with baseline methods.
5/21/2024
Hypergraph Self-supervised Learning with Sampling-efficient Signals
Fan Li, Xiaoyang Wang, Dawei Cheng, Wenjie Zhang, Ying Zhang, Xuemin Lin
0
0
Self-supervised learning (SSL) provides a promising alternative for representation learning on hypergraphs without costly labels. However, existing hypergraph SSL models are mostly based on contrastive methods with the instance-level discrimination strategy, suffering from two significant limitations: (1) They select negative samples arbitrarily, which is unreliable in deciding similar and dissimilar pairs, causing training bias. (2) They often require a large number of negative samples, resulting in expensive computational costs. To address the above issues, we propose SE-HSSL, a hypergraph SSL framework with three sampling-efficient self-supervised signals. Specifically, we introduce two sampling-free objectives leveraging the canonical correlation analysis as the node-level and group-level self-supervised signals. Additionally, we develop a novel hierarchical membership-level contrast objective motivated by the cascading overlap relationship in hypergraphs, which can further reduce membership sampling bias and improve the efficiency of sample utilization. Through comprehensive experiments on 7 real-world hypergraphs, we demonstrate the superiority of our approach over the state-of-the-art method in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency.
4/19/2024
Characterizing the Influence of Topology on Graph Learning Tasks
Kailong Wu, Yule Xie, Jiaxin Ding, Yuxiang Ren, Luoyi Fu, Xinbing Wang, Chenghu Zhou
0
0
Graph neural networks (GNN) have achieved remarkable success in a wide range of tasks by encoding features combined with topology to create effective representations. However, the fundamental problem of understanding and analyzing how graph topology influences the performance of learning models on downstream tasks has not yet been well understood. In this paper, we propose a metric, TopoInf, which characterizes the influence of graph topology by measuring the level of compatibility between the topological information of graph data and downstream task objectives. We provide analysis based on the decoupled GNNs on the contextual stochastic block model to demonstrate the effectiveness of the metric. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that TopoInf is an effective metric for measuring topological influence on corresponding tasks and can be further leveraged to enhance graph learning.
4/12/2024