Exploring Higher Education Competencies through Spreadsheet Self-Assessment and Time

Read original: arXiv:2409.12974 - Published 9/23/2024 by Maria Csernoch, Judit T. Kiss, Viktor Tak'acs, Domici'an M'at'e
Total Score

0

🔄

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the spreadsheet competencies and self-assessment abilities of higher education students.
  • The researchers hypothesized that students would perform better on spreadsheet tasks in digital environments compared to paper-based versions.
  • However, the findings indicate that students tend to overestimate their spreadsheet skills and take significantly more time to achieve the same results in digital environments.
  • The study highlights the importance of accurate self-assessment and time management for digital skill development in higher education, particularly in technology-driven disciplines.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to understand how well university students can use spreadsheet software like Excel and assess their own abilities. They thought that since students are digital natives who have grown up with technology, they would be better at working with spreadsheets on a computer compared to doing it on paper.

However, the study found that this wasn't the case. The students tended to think their spreadsheet skills were better than they actually were, whether they were using a computer or paper. Additionally, the students needed about twice as much time to get the same good results when using a computer compared to paper.

This goes against the common assumption that students today don't need to be taught computer skills because they already know them. Instead, the research shows that even tech-savvy students benefit from learning how to accurately assess their own digital skills and manage their time when working on technology-based tasks.

Technical Explanation

The study used a mixed-methods approach to assess university students' spreadsheet competencies. Participants completed both self-assessment surveys and hands-on spreadsheet tasks, which were performed either on paper or using Microsoft Excel.

The results indicate that students tend to overestimate their spreadsheet skills compared to their actual performance. Students achieved similar high scores on both the paper-based and digital tasks, but the digital tasks took them nearly twice as long to complete.

These findings contradict the assumption that digital native students inherently possess strong computer skills and do not need formal computer science education. Instead, the study highlights the importance of incorporating accurate self-assessment and time management into curricula, especially for technology-focused disciplines.

Critical Analysis

While the paper provides valuable insights into students' spreadsheet competencies, there are a few potential limitations to consider. First, the study was conducted at a single university, so the findings may not be generalizable to all higher education settings. Additionally, the researchers note that the sample size was relatively small, which could affect the statistical power of the results.

Another area for further exploration is the role of prior experience and training in spreadsheet use. The paper does not delve into how students' existing skills and educational backgrounds might influence their performance and self-assessment abilities. Incorporating these factors could provide a more nuanced understanding of the observed trends.

Overall, this research challenges the commonly held belief that digital natives inherently possess strong technological skills. By highlighting the need for accurate self-assessment and time management in digital skill development, the study encourages higher education institutions to re-evaluate their approaches to teaching technology-related competencies.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on the disconnect between higher education students' perceived and actual spreadsheet competencies. The findings suggest that even digital natives may struggle to accurately assess their skills and effectively manage their time when working with technology-based tools.

The implications of this research extend beyond spreadsheet use, emphasizing the importance of incorporating self-assessment strategies and time management into the curriculum, particularly for technology-driven disciplines. By addressing these areas, higher education institutions can better prepare students for the demands of the modern, digitally-focused workplace.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔄

Total Score

0

New!Exploring Higher Education Competencies through Spreadsheet Self-Assessment and Time

Maria Csernoch, Judit T. Kiss, Viktor Tak'acs, Domici'an M'at'e

The present paper aims to explore higher education students' spreadsheet competencies and reliability through self-assessment and real-world problem-solving practices. Digital natives alleged skills and competences allowed us to hypothesize that students perform better in Excel than on paper, but the findings cannot confirm this hypothesis. However, our results indicate that students tend to inaccurately assess their spreadsheet competencies compared to their actual performance in both paper-based and Excel tasks. It has also be found that students need at least twice as much time to achieve the same high scores in the digital environment as they do on paper. The results violated the widely accepted assumption that digital native students do not need computer science education, since they are born with it. This study highlights the importance of accurate self-assessment in digital skill development and time management within higher education contexts, particularly in technology-driven disciplines.

Read more

9/23/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

New!Subject integration with spreadsheets -- Ignoring education is the greatest risk ever

M'aria Csernoch, 'Ad'am Gul'acsi, J'ulia Csernoch

Within the framework of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge, subject integration is one possible solution for the introduction of meaningful digitalization and digitization in schools. This process incorporates that any school subject can be taught with digital support, informatics (computer) classes can be contextualized, and the gap between 'serious informatics' and 'digital literacy' can be minimized. The present paper details how three traditional Grade 3 tasks can be solved in spreadsheets, what skills, competencies, and computer science knowledge of both teachers and students can be developed. The solutions also reveal that analysing, understanding, planning, and discussing tasks is as important as the activity in the spreadsheets, which process plays a crucial role in the preparation of students for their future jobs.

Read more

9/23/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

The Paradox of Spreadsheet Self-Efficacy: Social Incentives for Informal Knowledge Sharing in End-User Programming

Qing (Nancy), Xia, Advait Sarkar, Duncan P. Brumby, Anna Cox

Informal Knowledge Sharing (KS) is vital for end-user programmers to gain expertise. To better understand how personal (self-efficacy), social (reputational gains, trust between colleagues), and software-related (codification effort) variables influence spreadsheet KS intention, we conducted a multiple regressions analysis based on survey data from spreadsheet users (textit{n}=100) in administrative and finance roles. We found that high levels of spreadsheet self-efficacy and a perception that sharing would result in reputational gains predicted higher KS intention, but individuals who found knowledge codification effortful showed lower KS intention. We also observed that regardless of occupation, users tended to report a lower sense of self-efficacy in their general spreadsheet proficiency, despite also reporting high self-efficacy in spreadsheet use for job-related contexts. Our findings suggest that acknowledging and designing for these social and personal variables can help avoid situations where experienced individuals refrain unnecessarily from sharing, with implications for spreadsheet design.

Read more

8/16/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Comparative Analysis of Digital Tools and Traditional Teaching Methods in Educational Effectiveness

Aarush Kandukoori, Aditya Kandukoori, Faizan Wajid

In today's world technology comprises a large aspect of our lives so this study aimed to investigate if using computers and digital tools are better than traditional methods like using textbooks and worksheets for learning math. This study was done at Clarksburg Elementary School with help from MoCo Innovation which is a club that focuses on fostering an interest in technology among students. A major question that sparked our minds was: Are digital tools like learning on computers better than traditional methods for improving students math skills? We believe students who use digital tools might improve more in their math skills. To find out we worked with 30 students from the school. We split them into two groups and gave each group a pre assessment and post assessment. One group learned math using computers and were able to use interactive math websites such as Khan Academy while the other group used worksheets. After some learning we gave them a post assessment to see how much they had improved. Our results showed that the students who used the digital tools improved test scores averages by 24.2 percent from 70 percent to 87 percent while the students who used traditional methods only improved by 8.3 percent from 72 percent to 78 percent in math. These results show that digital tools are superior to regular teaching methods especially for subjects like math. But more research is required to see if digital tools are the main reason for this improvement. This research is definitely important to help schools decide if they want to use more technology.

Read more

8/14/2024