Exploring Saliency Bias in Manipulation Detection

Read original: arXiv:2402.07338 - Published 8/22/2024 by Joshua Krinsky, Alan Bettis, Qiuyu Tang, Daniel Moreira, Aparna Bharati
Total Score

0

🔎

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The rapid spread of fake news and manipulated images on social media is a growing problem.
  • Existing methods for detecting image manipulation mostly focus on individual media objects, without considering the impact on viewer perception.
  • Forensic datasets are usually analyzed based on the manipulation operations and pixel-based masks, but not on the semantics of the manipulation, such as the type of scene or objects.
  • The semantics of the manipulation play a crucial role in the spread of misinformation through manipulated images.
  • This paper proposes a framework to analyze the trends of visual and semantic saliency in popular image manipulation datasets and their impact on detection.

Plain English Explanation

The explosion of fake news and doctored images on social media has become a major problem. Most existing methods for detecting image manipulation focus solely on the technical aspects of the manipulation, such as the pixel changes, without considering how the manipulation affects the viewer's perception and understanding of the image.

Forensic datasets used to train these detection models are typically analyzed based on the specific manipulation techniques used and the corresponding pixel-level changes, but not on the broader semantic context of the image, such as the type of scene or objects depicted. However, the semantic meaning of the manipulation is crucial in determining how the image will be interpreted and potentially used to spread misinformation.

To address this gap, the researchers propose a framework to analyze the visual and semantic saliency - the aspects of the image that draw the viewer's attention - in popular image manipulation datasets. This can help understand how the manipulation impacts the viewer's perception and interpretation of the image, which is essential for developing more effective detection methods to combat the spread of visual misinformation.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a framework to analyze the trends of visual and semantic saliency in popular image manipulation datasets, such as M3Manipulation, and how these saliency patterns impact the effectiveness of detection models.

The researchers first compute the visual saliency maps for the images in the datasets, which highlight the regions that draw the viewer's attention. They then analyze the semantic saliency, which looks at the importance of different objects, scenes, and other semantic elements in the image.

By comparing the saliency patterns between the original and manipulated images, the framework can identify how the manipulation affects the viewer's focus and understanding of the image content. This information can then be used to develop more robust detection models that take into account the semantic context of the manipulation, rather than just the low-level pixel changes.

Critical Analysis

The proposed framework provides a valuable approach to understanding the impact of image manipulations on viewer perception, which is an important but often overlooked aspect of developing effective detection methods. By analyzing both visual and semantic saliency, the researchers aim to capture a more comprehensive understanding of how manipulations can be used to spread misinformation.

However, the paper does not provide details on the specific datasets, manipulation techniques, or saliency computation methods used in the analysis. Additionally, the framework is presented conceptually, without any experimental results or validation of its effectiveness. Further research would be needed to implement and test the framework on real-world datasets and manipulation scenarios.

Another potential limitation is that saliency alone may not be sufficient to fully capture the nuances of how manipulations influence viewer interpretation. Factors such as prior beliefs, emotional responses, and social context could also play a significant role in how manipulated images are perceived and spread.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel framework to analyze the impact of image manipulations on viewer perception, focusing on the trends of visual and semantic saliency in popular manipulation datasets. By considering the semantic context of the manipulation, rather than just the technical details, the framework aims to provide valuable insights for developing more robust and effective detection methods to combat the growing problem of visual misinformation on social media.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔎

Total Score

0

Exploring Saliency Bias in Manipulation Detection

Joshua Krinsky, Alan Bettis, Qiuyu Tang, Daniel Moreira, Aparna Bharati

The social media-fuelled explosion of fake news and misinformation supported by tampered images has led to growth in the development of models and datasets for image manipulation detection. However, existing detection methods mostly treat media objects in isolation, without considering the impact of specific manipulations on viewer perception. Forensic datasets are usually analyzed based on the manipulation operations and corresponding pixel-based masks, but not on the semantics of the manipulation, i.e., type of scene, objects, and viewers' attention to scene content. The semantics of the manipulation play an important role in spreading misinformation through manipulated images. In an attempt to encourage further development of semantic-aware forensic approaches to understand visual misinformation, we propose a framework to analyze the trends of visual and semantic saliency in popular image manipulation datasets and their impact on detection.

Read more

8/22/2024

Harmfully Manipulated Images Matter in Multimodal Misinformation Detection
Total Score

0

Harmfully Manipulated Images Matter in Multimodal Misinformation Detection

Bing Wang, Shengsheng Wang, Changchun Li, Renchu Guan, Ximing Li

Nowadays, misinformation is widely spreading over various social media platforms and causes extremely negative impacts on society. To combat this issue, automatically identifying misinformation, especially those containing multimodal content, has attracted growing attention from the academic and industrial communities, and induced an active research topic named Multimodal Misinformation Detection (MMD). Typically, existing MMD methods capture the semantic correlation and inconsistency between multiple modalities, but neglect some potential clues in multimodal content. Recent studies suggest that manipulated traces of the images in articles are non-trivial clues for detecting misinformation. Meanwhile, we find that the underlying intentions behind the manipulation, e.g., harmful and harmless, also matter in MMD. Accordingly, in this work, we propose to detect misinformation by learning manipulation features that indicate whether the image has been manipulated, as well as intention features regarding the harmful and harmless intentions of the manipulation. Unfortunately, the manipulation and intention labels that make these features discriminative are unknown. To overcome the problem, we propose two weakly supervised signals as alternatives by introducing additional datasets on image manipulation detection and formulating two classification tasks as positive and unlabeled learning problems. Based on these ideas, we propose a novel MMD method, namely Harmfully Manipulated Images Matter in MMD (HAMI-M3D). Extensive experiments across three benchmark datasets can demonstrate that HAMI-M3D can consistently improve the performance of any MMD baselines.

Read more

7/30/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Semantic Contextualization of Face Forgery: A New Definition, Dataset, and Detection Method

Mian Zou, Baosheng Yu, Yibing Zhan, Siwei Lyu, Kede Ma

In recent years, deep learning has greatly streamlined the process of generating realistic fake face images. Aware of the dangers, researchers have developed various tools to spot these counterfeits. Yet none asked the fundamental question: What digital manipulations make a real photographic face image fake, while others do not? In this paper, we put face forgery in a semantic context and define that computational methods that alter semantic face attributes to exceed human discrimination thresholds are sources of face forgery. Guided by our new definition, we construct a large face forgery image dataset, where each image is associated with a set of labels organized in a hierarchical graph. Our dataset enables two new testing protocols to probe the generalization of face forgery detectors. Moreover, we propose a semantics-oriented face forgery detection method that captures label relations and prioritizes the primary task (ie, real or fake face detection). We show that the proposed dataset successfully exposes the weaknesses of current detectors as the test set and consistently improves their generalizability as the training set. Additionally, we demonstrate the superiority of our semantics-oriented method over traditional binary and multi-class classification-based detectors.

Read more

5/15/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

ManiTweet: A New Benchmark for Identifying Manipulation of News on Social Media

Kung-Hsiang Huang, Hou Pong Chan, Kathleen McKeown, Heng Ji

Considerable advancements have been made to tackle the misrepresentation of information derived from reference articles in the domains of fact-checking and faithful summarization. However, an unaddressed aspect remains - the identification of social media posts that manipulate information within associated news articles. This task presents a significant challenge, primarily due to the prevalence of personal opinions in such posts. We present a novel task, identifying manipulation of news on social media, which aims to detect manipulation in social media posts and identify manipulated or inserted information. To study this task, we have proposed a data collection schema and curated a dataset called ManiTweet, consisting of 3.6K pairs of tweets and corresponding articles. Our analysis demonstrates that this task is highly challenging, with large language models (LLMs) yielding unsatisfactory performance. Additionally, we have developed a simple yet effective basic model that outperforms LLMs significantly on the ManiTweet dataset. Finally, we have conducted an exploratory analysis of human-written tweets, unveiling intriguing connections between manipulation and the domain and factuality of news articles, as well as revealing that manipulated sentences are more likely to encapsulate the main story or consequences of a news outlet.

Read more

6/13/2024