Exploring Use and Perceptions of Generative AI Art Tools by Blind Artists

Read original: arXiv:2409.08226 - Published 9/14/2024 by Gayatri Raman, Erin Brady
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the intersection of AI art and blindness.
  • Existing AI research has primarily focused on AI art's reception and impact on sighted artists and consumers.
  • To address this gap, the researcher interviewed six blind artists from various visual art mediums about their experiences with the generative AI image platform Midjourney.
  • The findings highlight blind artists' interest in AI images as a collaborative tool but also their concerns about cultural perceptions and labeling of AI-generated art.
  • The study advocates for greater inclusion of blind individuals in AI art, emphasizing the need to address their specific needs and experiences in developing AI art technologies.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how AI art and blindness intersect. Previous research on AI art has mostly focused on its effects on sighted artists and viewers. To explore this further, the researcher interviewed six blind artists who work in different visual art mediums about their experiences with the Midjourney AI image generation platform.

The blind artists expressed interest in using AI images as a collaborative tool in their work. However, they also shared concerns about how AI-generated art is perceived and labeled by the public. They highlighted unique challenges, such as the potential for misunderstandings and stereotypes about blindness to lead to the exclusion of blind artists.

The study argues that we need to do more to include blind individuals in the development of AI art technologies. This means addressing their specific needs and experiences to ensure they can fully participate in and benefit from these new creative tools.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a qualitative study that explores the experiences and perspectives of blind artists using the Midjourney generative AI image platform. The researcher conducted in-depth interviews with six blind artists from various visual art backgrounds, ranging from low vision to total blindness.

During the interviews, the participants shared text prompts they had used with Midjourney and discussed their reactions to the generated images. The findings highlight the blind artists' interest in AI images as a collaborative tool that can enhance their creative process. However, the participants also expressed concerns about the cultural perceptions and labeling of AI-generated art, and the potential for misunderstandings and stereotypes about blindness to exclude them from the AI art community.

The study advocates for greater inclusion of blind individuals in the development of AI art technologies. It emphasizes the need to address the specific needs and experiences of blind artists to ensure they can fully participate in and benefit from these new creative tools, such as Midjourney.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the experiences and perspectives of blind artists using generative AI art tools. By highlighting the unique challenges and concerns of this underrepresented group, the study underscores the importance of including diverse voices in the development of AI art technologies.

However, the small sample size of six participants limits the generalizability of the findings. Further research with a larger and more diverse pool of blind artists would be helpful to validate and expand upon the insights presented in this paper.

Additionally, the study does not delve into the specific accessibility features or design considerations that could better support blind artists in using generative AI tools. Exploring these technical and user experience aspects in more depth could provide actionable recommendations for improving the inclusivity of AI art platforms.

Overall, this paper serves as an important starting point for addressing the gap in understanding the intersection of AI art and blindness. Continued research and collaboration with the blind artist community will be crucial for ensuring that the benefits of these emerging technologies are accessible to all.

Conclusion

This paper sheds light on the experiences and perspectives of blind artists using generative AI art platforms like Midjourney. The findings highlight the blind artists' interest in AI images as a collaborative tool, as well as their concerns about cultural perceptions and potential exclusion from the AI art community.

The study advocates for greater inclusion of blind individuals in the development of AI art technologies, underscoring the need to address their specific needs and experiences. By doing so, the researchers argue, we can better support blind artists in fully participating in and benefiting from these new creative tools.

While the small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings, this paper serves as an important first step in understanding the intersection of AI art and blindness. Continued research and collaboration with the blind artist community will be crucial for ensuring that the promise of AI art is accessible to all.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

Exploring Use and Perceptions of Generative AI Art Tools by Blind Artists

Gayatri Raman, Erin Brady

The paper explores the intersection of AI art and blindness, as existing AI research has primarily focused on AI art's reception and impact, on sighted artists and consumers. To address this gap, the researcher interviewed six blind artists from various visual art mediums and levels of blindness about the generative AI image platform Midjourney. The participants shared text prompts and discussed their reactions to the generated images with the sighted researcher. The findings highlight blind artists' interest in AI images as a collaborative tool but express concerns about cultural perceptions and labeling of AI-generated art. They also underscore unique challenges, such as potential misunderstandings and stereotypes about blindness leading to exclusion. The study advocates for greater inclusion of blind individuals in AI art, emphasizing the need to address their specific needs and experiences in developing AI art technologies.

Read more

9/14/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency, Ownership, and Fairness in AI Generative Art

Juniper Lovato, Julia Zimmerman, Isabelle Smith, Peter Dodds, Jennifer Karson

Generative AI tools are used to create art-like outputs and sometimes aid in the creative process. These tools have potential benefits for artists, but they also have the potential to harm the art workforce and infringe upon artistic and intellectual property rights. Without explicit consent from artists, Generative AI creators scrape artists' digital work to train Generative AI models and produce art-like outputs at scale. These outputs are now being used to compete with human artists in the marketplace as well as being used by some artists in their generative processes to create art. We surveyed 459 artists to investigate the tension between artists' opinions on Generative AI art's potential utility and harm. This study surveys artists' opinions on the utility and threat of Generative AI art models, fair practices in the disclosure of artistic works in AI art training models, ownership and rights of AI art derivatives, and fair compensation. Results show that a majority of artists believe creators should disclose what art is being used in AI training, that AI outputs should not belong to model creators, and express concerns about AI's impact on the art workforce and who profits from their art. We hope the results of this work will further meaningful collaboration and alignment between the art community and Generative AI researchers and developers.

Read more

5/16/2024

Engaging with Children's Artwork in Mixed Visual-Ability Families
Total Score

0

Engaging with Children's Artwork in Mixed Visual-Ability Families

Arnavi Chheda-Kothary, Jacob O. Wobbrock, Jon E. Froehlich

We present two studies exploring how blind or low-vision (BLV) family members engage with their sighted children's artwork, strategies to support understanding and interpretation, and the potential role of technology, such as AI, therein. Our first study involved 14 BLV individuals, and the second included five groups of BLV individuals with their children. Through semi-structured interviews with AI descriptions of children's artwork and multi-sensory design probes, we found that BLV family members value artwork engagement as a bonding opportunity, preferring the child's storytelling and interpretation over other nonvisual representations. Additionally, despite some inaccuracies, BLV family members felt that AI-generated descriptions could facilitate dialogue with their children and aid self-guided art discovery. We close with specific design considerations for supporting artwork engagement in mixed visual-ability families, including enabling artwork access through various methods, supporting children's corrections of AI output, and distinctions in context vs. content and interpretation vs. description of children's artwork.

Read more

7/31/2024

Visions of Destruction: Exploring a Potential of Generative AI in Interactive Art
Total Score

0

Visions of Destruction: Exploring a Potential of Generative AI in Interactive Art

Mar Canet Sola, Varvara Guljajeva

This paper explores the potential of generative AI within interactive art, employing a practice-based research approach. It presents the interactive artwork Visions of Destruction as a detailed case study, highlighting its innovative use of generative AI to create a dynamic, audience-responsive experience. This artwork applies gaze-based interaction to dynamically alter digital landscapes, symbolizing the impact of human activities on the environment by generating contemporary collages created with AI, trained on data about human damage to nature, and guided by audience interaction. The transformation of pristine natural scenes into human-made and industrialized landscapes through viewer interaction serves as a stark reminder of environmental degradation. The paper thoroughly explores the technical challenges and artistic innovations involved in creating such an interactive art installation, emphasizing the potential of generative AI to revolutionize artistic expression, audience engagement, and especially the opportunities for the interactive art field. It offers insights into the conceptual framework behind the artwork, aiming to evoke a deeper understanding and reflection on the Anthropocene era and human-induced climate change. This study contributes significantly to the field of creative AI and interactive art, blending technology and environmental consciousness in a compelling, thought-provoking manner.

Read more

8/28/2024