Fair Graph Neural Network with Supervised Contrastive Regularization

2404.06090

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/10/2024 by Mahdi Tavassoli Kejani (UT3), Fadi Dornaika (IMT), Jean-Michel Loubes (IMT)

🧠

Abstract

In recent years, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have made significant advancements, particularly in tasks such as node classification, link prediction, and graph representation. However, challenges arise from biases that can be hidden not only in the node attributes but also in the connections between entities. Therefore, ensuring fairness in graph neural network learning has become a critical problem. To address this issue, we propose a novel model for training fairness-aware GNN, which enhances the Counterfactual Augmented Fair Graph Neural Network Framework (CAF). Our approach integrates Supervised Contrastive Loss and Environmental Loss to enhance both accuracy and fairness. Experimental validation on three real datasets demonstrates the superiority of our proposed model over CAF and several other existing graph-based learning methods.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • In recent years, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown significant progress in tasks like node classification, link prediction, and graph representation.
  • However, biases can be present not only in node attributes but also in the connections between entities, presenting challenges for ensuring fairness in GNN learning.
  • The paper proposes a novel model for training fairness-aware GNNs, building upon the Counterfactual Augmented Fair Graph Neural Network Framework (CAF).
  • The approach integrates Supervised Contrastive Loss and Environmental Loss to enhance both accuracy and fairness.
  • Experimental validation on three real datasets demonstrates the superiority of the proposed model over CAF and other existing graph-based learning methods.

Plain English Explanation

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a type of machine learning model that can work with data represented as graphs, where nodes represent entities and edges represent relationships between them. In recent years, GNNs have become increasingly powerful at tasks like identifying the category of a node, predicting links between nodes, and learning useful representations of entire graphs.

However, a key challenge with GNNs is that the data they are trained on can contain biases, not only in the attributes of the nodes (e.g., the features describing each entity) but also in the connections between the nodes (e.g., the relationships between entities). These biases can lead to unfair or biased predictions from the GNN model.

To address this issue, the researchers propose a new GNN training approach that aims to make the model more fair and unbiased. Their method builds on an existing fairness-aware GNN framework called CAF, and adds two new loss functions: Supervised Contrastive Loss and Environmental Loss. These losses help the model learn representations that are accurate but also fair and unbiased.

The researchers tested their approach on three real-world datasets and found that it outperformed the original CAF framework as well as other existing graph-based learning methods in terms of both accuracy and fairness.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a Fairness-Aware Graph Neural Network (FA-GNN) model that builds upon the Counterfactual Augmented Fair Graph Neural Network Framework (CAF). The key innovations are the integration of:

  1. Supervised Contrastive Loss: This loss function encourages the model to learn node representations that are similar for nodes with the same label, and dissimilar for nodes with different labels. This helps the model capture relevant semantic information while reducing the impact of biases.

  2. Environmental Loss: This loss function encourages the model to learn node representations that are independent of sensitive attributes (e.g., race, gender) that could introduce unfairness. This helps the model avoid basing predictions on these potentially biased attributes.

The researchers conducted experiments on three real-world datasets: Reddit, Pokec, and Amazon. They compared their FA-GNN model against the original CAF framework as well as other graph-based learning methods, such as GCN and GraphSAGE.

The results demonstrate that the proposed FA-GNN model outperforms these baselines in terms of both accuracy and fairness metrics, highlighting the effectiveness of the Supervised Contrastive Loss and Environmental Loss in learning fair and accurate node representations.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to addressing the important challenge of fairness in Graph Neural Networks. By incorporating Supervised Contrastive Loss and Environmental Loss, the researchers have developed a model that can learn node representations that are both accurate and fair, reducing the impact of biases in the data.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on a small set of real-world datasets. While the results on these datasets are compelling, it would be valuable to see the model's performance evaluated on a wider range of datasets, including larger and more diverse graphs, to better understand its generalizability.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the interpretability of the learned node representations. Understanding how the model arrives at its fairness-aware decisions would be an important next step, as it could provide valuable insights for practitioners and help build trust in the model's fairness.

Overall, the proposed FA-GNN model represents a significant step forward in the quest for fair and accurate GNN-based systems. By thoughtfully addressing the challenge of bias, the researchers have made an important contribution to the field of graph-based machine learning.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel Fairness-Aware Graph Neural Network (FA-GNN) model that addresses the challenge of ensuring fairness in GNN learning. By integrating Supervised Contrastive Loss and Environmental Loss, the model is able to learn node representations that are both accurate and fair, reducing the impact of biases in the data.

The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the FA-GNN model over existing graph-based learning methods, highlighting its potential to enable the development of more equitable and trustworthy GNN-powered applications. As the use of GNNs continues to grow, this research represents an important step towards building AI systems that are fair and unbiased, a critical consideration for the responsible deployment of these powerful machine learning techniques.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🧠

Bridging the Fairness Divide: Achieving Group and Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networks

Duna Zhan, Dongliang Guo, Pengsheng Ji, Sheng Li

YC

0

Reddit

0

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing and learning from complex data structured as graphs, demonstrating remarkable effectiveness in various applications, such as social network analysis, recommendation systems, and drug discovery. However, despite their impressive performance, the fairness problem has increasingly gained attention as a crucial aspect to consider. Existing research in graph learning focuses on either group fairness or individual fairness. However, since each concept provides unique insights into fairness from distinct perspectives, integrating them into a fair graph neural network system is crucial. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet to comprehensively tackle both individual and group fairness simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a new concept of individual fairness within groups and a novel framework named Fairness for Group and Individual (FairGI), which considers both group fairness and individual fairness within groups in the context of graph learning. FairGI employs the similarity matrix of individuals to achieve individual fairness within groups, while leveraging adversarial learning to address group fairness in terms of both Equal Opportunity and Statistical Parity. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach not only outperforms other state-of-the-art models in terms of group fairness and individual fairness within groups, but also exhibits excellent performance in population-level individual fairness, while maintaining comparable prediction accuracy.

Read more

4/29/2024

🤷

CAFIN: Centrality Aware Fairness inducing IN-processing for Unsupervised Representation Learning on Graphs

Arvindh Arun, Aakash Aanegola, Amul Agrawal, Ramasuri Narayanam, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru

YC

0

Reddit

0

Unsupervised Representation Learning on graphs is gaining traction due to the increasing abundance of unlabelled network data and the compactness, richness, and usefulness of the representations generated. In this context, the need to consider fairness and bias constraints while generating the representations has been well-motivated and studied to some extent in prior works. One major limitation of most of the prior works in this setting is that they do not aim to address the bias generated due to connectivity patterns in the graphs, such as varied node centrality, which leads to a disproportionate performance across nodes. In our work, we aim to address this issue of mitigating bias due to inherent graph structure in an unsupervised setting. To this end, we propose CAFIN, a centrality-aware fairness-inducing framework that leverages the structural information of graphs to tune the representations generated by existing frameworks. We deploy it on GraphSAGE (a popular framework in this domain) and showcase its efficacy on two downstream tasks - Node Classification and Link Prediction. Empirically, CAFIN consistently reduces the performance disparity across popular datasets (varying from 18 to 80% reduction in performance disparity) from various domains while incurring only a minimal cost of fairness.

Read more

4/23/2024

🔍

Individual Fairness Through Reweighting and Tuning

Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Lea Goetz, Russ Altman

YC

0

Reddit

0

Inherent bias within society can be amplified and perpetuated by artificial intelligence (AI) systems. To address this issue, a wide range of solutions have been proposed to identify and mitigate bias and enforce fairness for individuals and groups. Recently, Graph Laplacian Regularizer (GLR), a regularization technique from the semi-supervised learning literature has been used as a substitute for the common Lipschitz condition to enhance individual fairness. Notable prior work has shown that enforcing individual fairness through a GLR can improve the transfer learning accuracy of AI models under covariate shifts. However, the prior work defines a GLR on the source and target data combined, implicitly assuming that the target data are available at train time, which might not hold in practice. In this work, we investigated whether defining a GLR independently on the train and target data could maintain similar accuracy. Furthermore, we introduced the Normalized Fairness Gain score (NFG) to measure individual fairness by measuring the amount of gained fairness when a GLR is used versus not. We evaluated the new and original methods under NFG, the Prediction Consistency (PC), and traditional classification metrics on the German Credit Approval dataset. The results showed that the two models achieved similar statistical mean performances over five-fold cross-validation. Furthermore, the proposed metric showed that PC scores can be misleading as the scores can be high and statistically similar to fairness-enhanced models while NFG scores are small. This work therefore provides new insights into when a GLR effectively enhances individual fairness and the pitfalls of PC.

Read more

5/9/2024

🧠

Equipping Federated Graph Neural Networks with Structure-aware Group Fairness

Nan Cui, Xiuling Wang, Wendy Hui Wang, Violet Chen, Yue Ning

YC

0

Reddit

0

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used for various types of graph data processing and analytical tasks in different domains. Training GNNs over centralized graph data can be infeasible due to privacy concerns and regulatory restrictions. Thus, federated learning (FL) becomes a trending solution to address this challenge in a distributed learning paradigm. However, as GNNs may inherit historical bias from training data and lead to discriminatory predictions, the bias of local models can be easily propagated to the global model in distributed settings. This poses a new challenge in mitigating bias in federated GNNs. To address this challenge, we propose $text{F}^2$GNN, a Fair Federated Graph Neural Network, that enhances group fairness of federated GNNs. As bias can be sourced from both data and learning algorithms, $text{F}^2$GNN aims to mitigate both types of bias under federated settings. First, we provide theoretical insights on the connection between data bias in a training graph and statistical fairness metrics of the trained GNN models. Based on the theoretical analysis, we design $text{F}^2$GNN which contains two key components: a fairness-aware local model update scheme that enhances group fairness of the local models on the client side, and a fairness-weighted global model update scheme that takes both data bias and fairness metrics of local models into consideration in the aggregation process. We evaluate $text{F}^2$GNN empirically versus a number of baseline methods, and demonstrate that $text{F}^2$GNN outperforms these baselines in terms of both fairness and model accuracy.

Read more

5/15/2024