Equipping Federated Graph Neural Networks with Structure-aware Group Fairness

Read original: arXiv:2310.12350 - Published 5/15/2024 by Nan Cui, Xiuling Wang, Wendy Hui Wang, Violet Chen, Yue Ning
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely used for processing and analyzing graph data across various domains.
  • Training GNNs on centralized graph data can be challenging due to privacy concerns and regulatory restrictions.
  • Federated learning (FL) is a distributed learning paradigm that addresses this challenge, but can lead to the propagation of bias from local models to the global model.
  • To mitigate bias in federated GNNs, the authors propose F²GNN, a Fair Federated Graph Neural Network.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the challenge of training Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) on centralized graph data due to privacy concerns and regulatory restrictions. Federated learning is presented as a solution, but the authors highlight a new issue: the potential for bias to be propagated from local models to the global model in a federated learning setting.

To address this problem, the researchers introduce F²GNN, a Fair Federated Graph Neural Network. The key idea is to mitigate both data bias and algorithmic bias in the federated learning process. The authors provide theoretical insights on the connection between data bias and fairness metrics of the trained GNN models. Based on this analysis, they design F²GNN with two main components:

  1. A fairness-aware local model update scheme that enhances the group fairness of the local models on the client side.
  2. A fairness-weighted global model update scheme that considers both data bias and fairness metrics of local models during the aggregation process.

The authors evaluate F²GNN against several baseline methods and demonstrate that it outperforms them in terms of both fairness and model accuracy.

Technical Explanation

The paper first establishes the context of using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for various graph data processing and analytical tasks, and the challenges of training GNNs on centralized graph data due to privacy concerns and regulatory restrictions.

The authors then introduce federated learning (FL) as a solution to this challenge, but highlight a new issue: the potential for bias to be propagated from local models to the global model in a federated learning setting. To address this, the researchers propose F²GNN, a Fair Federated Graph Neural Network.

The key components of F²GNN are:

  1. Fairness-aware local model update scheme: This component aims to enhance the group fairness of the local models on the client side. The authors provide theoretical insights on the connection between data bias in the training graph and statistical fairness metrics of the trained GNN models.

  2. Fairness-weighted global model update scheme: This component takes both data bias and fairness metrics of local models into consideration during the aggregation process to mitigate the propagation of bias to the global model.

The authors evaluate F²GNN empirically against a number of baseline methods and demonstrate that it outperforms these baselines in terms of both fairness and model accuracy.

Critical Analysis

The paper addresses an important challenge in the field of federated learning, specifically the issue of bias propagation from local models to the global model. The authors' theoretical analysis and the design of F²GNN provide valuable insights into mitigating this problem.

One potential limitation of the research is the assumption that the training data for local models is already biased. In real-world scenarios, the degree and nature of bias in the training data may vary, and the proposed solutions may need to be adapted accordingly.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of different fairness metrics or the trade-offs between fairness and model performance in depth. Further research could investigate these aspects more thoroughly.

The authors also acknowledge that the proposed fairness-aware global model update scheme may incur additional computational overhead, which could be a concern in large-scale federated learning deployments. Exploring ways to optimize the efficiency of the algorithm could be a valuable area for future work.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel approach, F²GNN, to mitigate bias in federated Graph Neural Networks. By addressing both data bias and algorithmic bias, the authors demonstrate the potential to enhance the group fairness of the global model while maintaining high model accuracy.

This research contributes to the growing field of fair and ethical AI, addressing an important challenge in the widespread adoption of federated learning. The insights and techniques proposed in this paper can serve as a foundation for further advancements in ensuring fairness and ethical considerations in distributed machine learning systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Equipping Federated Graph Neural Networks with Structure-aware Group Fairness

Nan Cui, Xiuling Wang, Wendy Hui Wang, Violet Chen, Yue Ning

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used for various types of graph data processing and analytical tasks in different domains. Training GNNs over centralized graph data can be infeasible due to privacy concerns and regulatory restrictions. Thus, federated learning (FL) becomes a trending solution to address this challenge in a distributed learning paradigm. However, as GNNs may inherit historical bias from training data and lead to discriminatory predictions, the bias of local models can be easily propagated to the global model in distributed settings. This poses a new challenge in mitigating bias in federated GNNs. To address this challenge, we propose $text{F}^2$GNN, a Fair Federated Graph Neural Network, that enhances group fairness of federated GNNs. As bias can be sourced from both data and learning algorithms, $text{F}^2$GNN aims to mitigate both types of bias under federated settings. First, we provide theoretical insights on the connection between data bias in a training graph and statistical fairness metrics of the trained GNN models. Based on the theoretical analysis, we design $text{F}^2$GNN which contains two key components: a fairness-aware local model update scheme that enhances group fairness of the local models on the client side, and a fairness-weighted global model update scheme that takes both data bias and fairness metrics of local models into consideration in the aggregation process. We evaluate $text{F}^2$GNN empirically versus a number of baseline methods, and demonstrate that $text{F}^2$GNN outperforms these baselines in terms of both fairness and model accuracy.

Read more

5/15/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Bridging the Fairness Divide: Achieving Group and Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networks

Duna Zhan, Dongliang Guo, Pengsheng Ji, Sheng Li

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing and learning from complex data structured as graphs, demonstrating remarkable effectiveness in various applications, such as social network analysis, recommendation systems, and drug discovery. However, despite their impressive performance, the fairness problem has increasingly gained attention as a crucial aspect to consider. Existing research in graph learning focuses on either group fairness or individual fairness. However, since each concept provides unique insights into fairness from distinct perspectives, integrating them into a fair graph neural network system is crucial. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet to comprehensively tackle both individual and group fairness simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a new concept of individual fairness within groups and a novel framework named Fairness for Group and Individual (FairGI), which considers both group fairness and individual fairness within groups in the context of graph learning. FairGI employs the similarity matrix of individuals to achieve individual fairness within groups, while leveraging adversarial learning to address group fairness in terms of both Equal Opportunity and Statistical Parity. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach not only outperforms other state-of-the-art models in terms of group fairness and individual fairness within groups, but also exhibits excellent performance in population-level individual fairness, while maintaining comparable prediction accuracy.

Read more

4/29/2024

Rethinking Fair Graph Neural Networks from Re-balancing
Total Score

0

Rethinking Fair Graph Neural Networks from Re-balancing

Zhixun Li, Yushun Dong, Qiang Liu, Jeffrey Xu Yu

Driven by the powerful representation ability of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), plentiful GNN models have been widely deployed in many real-world applications. Nevertheless, due to distribution disparities between different demographic groups, fairness in high-stake decision-making systems is receiving increasing attention. Although lots of recent works devoted to improving the fairness of GNNs and achieved considerable success, they all require significant architectural changes or additional loss functions requiring more hyper-parameter tuning. Surprisingly, we find that simple re-balancing methods can easily match or surpass existing fair GNN methods. We claim that the imbalance across different demographic groups is a significant source of unfairness, resulting in imbalanced contributions from each group to the parameters updating. However, these simple re-balancing methods have their own shortcomings during training. In this paper, we propose FairGB, Fair Graph Neural Network via re-Balancing, which mitigates the unfairness of GNNs by group balancing. Technically, FairGB consists of two modules: counterfactual node mixup and contribution alignment loss. Firstly, we select counterfactual pairs across inter-domain and inter-class, and interpolate the ego-networks to generate new samples. Guided by analysis, we can reveal the debiasing mechanism of our model by the causal view and prove that our strategy can make sensitive attributes statistically independent from target labels. Secondly, we reweigh the contribution of each group according to gradients. By combining these two modules, they can mutually promote each other. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show that our method can achieve state-of-the-art results concerning both utility and fairness metrics. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhixunLEE/FairGB.

Read more

7/17/2024

📉

Total Score

0

Tackling the Local Bias in Federated Graph Learning

Binchi Zhang, Minnan Luo, Shangbin Feng, Ziqi Liu, Jun Zhou, Qinghua Zheng

Federated graph learning (FGL) has become an important research topic in response to the increasing scale and the distributed nature of graph-structured data in the real world. In FGL, a global graph is distributed across different clients, where each client holds a subgraph. Existing FGL methods often fail to effectively utilize cross-client edges, losing structural information during the training; additionally, local graphs often exhibit significant distribution divergence. These two issues make local models in FGL less desirable than in centralized graph learning, namely the local bias problem in this paper. To solve this problem, we propose a novel FGL framework to make the local models similar to the model trained in a centralized setting. Specifically, we design a distributed learning scheme, fully leveraging cross-client edges to aggregate information from other clients. In addition, we propose a label-guided sampling approach to alleviate the imbalanced local data and meanwhile, distinctly reduce the training overhead. Extensive experiments demonstrate that local bias can compromise the model performance and slow down the convergence during training. Experimental results also verify that our framework successfully mitigates local bias, achieving better performance than other baselines with lower time and memory overhead.

Read more

8/27/2024