Fast Explainability via Feasible Concept Sets Generator
2405.18664
0
0
Abstract
A long-standing dilemma prevents the broader application of explanation methods: general applicability and inference speed. On the one hand, existing model-agnostic explanation methods usually make minimal pre-assumptions about the prediction models to be explained. Still, they require additional queries to the model through propagation or back-propagation to approximate the models' behaviors, resulting in slow inference and hindering their use in time-sensitive tasks. On the other hand, various model-dependent explanations have been proposed that achieve low-cost, fast inference but at the expense of limiting their applicability to specific model structures. In this study, we bridge the gap between the universality of model-agnostic approaches and the efficiency of model-specific approaches by proposing a novel framework without assumptions on the prediction model's structures, achieving high efficiency during inference and allowing for real-time explanations. To achieve this, we first define explanations through a set of human-comprehensible concepts and propose a framework to elucidate model predictions via minimal feasible concept sets. Second, we show that a minimal feasible set generator can be learned as a companion explainer to the prediction model, generating explanations for predictions. Finally, we validate this framework by implementing a novel model-agnostic method that provides robust explanations while facilitating real-time inference. Our claims are substantiated by comprehensive experiments, highlighting the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method for generating "feasible concept sets" that can be used to provide fast and interpretable explanations for machine learning models.
- The method aims to overcome the limitations of existing concept-based explanation approaches, which can be computationally expensive and produce overly complex explanations.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark datasets and compare it to other state-of-the-art explainability methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to explain how machine learning models make decisions. Existing methods for explaining model decisions can be slow and produce explanations that are hard for people to understand. The authors' approach, called "Feasible Concept Sets Generator," generates a set of simple concepts that can be used to quickly explain a model's predictions.
The key idea is to find a small set of easily understandable concepts that collectively explain the model's behavior, rather than relying on complex mathematical formulas or intricate visualizations. This makes the explanations more accessible and helps users understand why the model is making certain predictions.
The authors test their method on several different machine learning tasks and compare it to other state-of-the-art explainability methods. They show that their approach can provide fast and interpretable explanations without sacrificing the accuracy of the underlying model.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new method called "Feasible Concept Sets Generator" (FCSG) for generating concept-based explanations of machine learning models. The key idea is to find a small set of "feasible concepts" that can collectively explain the model's behavior in an interpretable way.
The FCSG approach works by first identifying a set of candidate concepts that may be relevant to the model's predictions. These concepts could be based on domain knowledge or automatically extracted from the training data. The method then selects a subset of these concepts that can best explain the model's outputs, while ensuring that the selected concepts are easy for humans to understand.
To achieve this, FCSG formulates the concept selection problem as an optimization task, where the goal is to minimize the number of selected concepts while maximizing the fidelity of the explanations. The authors solve this optimization problem using a novel algorithm that efficiently explores the space of possible concept sets.
The authors evaluate FCSG on several benchmark datasets and compare it to other state-of-the-art concept-based explanation methods and global explanation approaches. The results show that FCSG can provide fast and interpretable explanations without sacrificing the accuracy of the underlying model.
Critical Analysis
The authors have made a valuable contribution by addressing the limitations of existing concept-based explanation methods, which can be computationally expensive and produce overly complex explanations. The FCSG approach represents an important step forward in making AI systems more interpretable and trustworthy.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential downsides of using concept-based explanations. While the authors claim that the selected concepts are "easy for humans to understand," this may not always be the case, especially for complex machine learning models or datasets. There is a risk that the selected concepts could oversimplify the model's decision-making process, leading to incomplete or potentially misleading explanations.
Additionally, the authors note that their method assumes the existence of a set of candidate concepts, which may not always be readily available or easy to define. In some cases, the process of identifying relevant concepts may require significant domain expertise or additional research.
Further research is needed to explore the broader applicability of the FCSG approach and to address potential limitations. For example, studies on the evaluation of concept-based explanations could provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of this type of explanation method.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach, called "Feasible Concept Sets Generator," for generating fast and interpretable explanations of machine learning models. The key innovation is the ability to efficiently select a small set of easily understandable concepts that can collectively explain the model's behavior.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark datasets and show that FCSG can outperform other state-of-the-art explainability methods in terms of speed and interpretability. This work represents an important step towards making AI systems more transparent and trustworthy, which is crucial for widespread adoption and responsible use of these technologies.
While the FCSG approach has promising results, there are still some limitations and areas for further research, such as addressing the potential oversimplification of complex models and the challenge of defining relevant candidate concepts. Nonetheless, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of AI explainability and will likely inspire further advancements in this important area of study.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Estimation of Concept Explanations Should be Uncertainty Aware
Vihari Piratla, Juyeon Heo, Katherine M. Collins, Sukriti Singh, Adrian Weller
0
0
Model explanations can be valuable for interpreting and debugging predictive models. We study a specific kind called Concept Explanations, where the goal is to interpret a model using human-understandable concepts. Although popular for their easy interpretation, concept explanations are known to be noisy. We begin our work by identifying various sources of uncertainty in the estimation pipeline that lead to such noise. We then propose an uncertainty-aware Bayesian estimation method to address these issues, which readily improved the quality of explanations. We demonstrate with theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation that explanations computed by our method are robust to train-time choices while also being label-efficient. Further, our method proved capable of recovering relevant concepts amongst a bank of thousands, in an evaluation with real-datasets and off-the-shelf models, demonstrating its scalability. We believe the improved quality of uncertainty-aware concept explanations make them a strong candidate for more reliable model interpretation. We release our code at https://github.com/vps-anonconfs/uace.
4/8/2024
🗣️
Causality-Aware Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations
Martina Cinquini, Riccardo Guidotti
0
0
A main drawback of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches is the feature independence assumption, hindering the study of potential variable dependencies. This leads to approximating black box behaviors by analyzing the effects on randomly generated feature values that may rarely occur in the original samples. This paper addresses this issue by integrating causal knowledge in an XAI method to enhance transparency and enable users to assess the quality of the generated explanations. Specifically, we propose a novel extension to a widely used local and model-agnostic explainer, which encodes explicit causal relationships within the data surrounding the instance being explained. Extensive experiments show that our approach overcomes the original method in terms of faithfully replicating the black-box model's mechanism and the consistency and reliability of the generated explanations.
4/16/2024
Evaluating Readability and Faithfulness of Concept-based Explanations
Meng Li, Haoran Jin, Ruixuan Huang, Zhihao Xu, Defu Lian, Zijia Lin, Di Zhang, Xiting Wang
0
0
Despite the surprisingly high intelligence exhibited by Large Language Models (LLMs), we are somehow intimidated to fully deploy them into real-life applications considering their black-box nature. Concept-based explanations arise as a promising avenue for explaining what the LLMs have learned, making them more transparent to humans. However, current evaluations for concepts tend to be heuristic and non-deterministic, e.g. case study or human evaluation, hindering the development of the field. To bridge the gap, we approach concept-based explanation evaluation via faithfulness and readability. We first introduce a formal definition of concept generalizable to diverse concept-based explanations. Based on this, we quantify faithfulness via the difference in the output upon perturbation. We then provide an automatic measure for readability, by measuring the coherence of patterns that maximally activate a concept. This measure serves as a cost-effective and reliable substitute for human evaluation. Finally, based on measurement theory, we describe a meta-evaluation method for evaluating the above measures via reliability and validity, which can be generalized to other tasks as well. Extensive experimental analysis has been conducted to validate and inform the selection of concept evaluation measures.
5/1/2024
🚀
Global Concept Explanations for Graphs by Contrastive Learning
Jonas Teufel, Pascal Friederich
0
0
Beyond improving trust and validating model fairness, xAI practices also have the potential to recover valuable scientific insights in application domains where little to no prior human intuition exists. To that end, we propose a method to extract global concept explanations from the predictions of graph neural networks to develop a deeper understanding of the tasks underlying structure-property relationships. We identify concept explanations as dense clusters in the self-explaining Megan models subgraph latent space. For each concept, we optimize a representative prototype graph and optionally use GPT-4 to provide hypotheses about why each structure has a certain effect on the prediction. We conduct computational experiments on synthetic and real-world graph property prediction tasks. For the synthetic tasks we find that our method correctly reproduces the structural rules by which they were created. For real-world molecular property regression and classification tasks, we find that our method rediscovers established rules of thumb. More specifically, our results for molecular mutagenicity prediction indicate more fine-grained resolution of structural details than existing explainability methods, consistent with previous results from chemistry literature. Overall, our results show promising capability to extract the underlying structure-property relationships for complex graph property prediction tasks.
4/26/2024