Fast sampling from constrained spaces using the Metropolis-adjusted Mirror Langevin algorithm
2312.08823
0
0
๐
Abstract
We propose a new method called the Metropolis-adjusted Mirror Langevin algorithm for approximate sampling from distributions whose support is a compact and convex set. This algorithm adds an accept-reject filter to the Markov chain induced by a single step of the Mirror Langevin algorithm (Zhang et al., 2020), which is a basic discretisation of the Mirror Langevin dynamics. Due to the inclusion of this filter, our method is unbiased relative to the target, while known discretisations of the Mirror Langevin dynamics including the Mirror Langevin algorithm have an asymptotic bias. For this algorithm, we also give upper bounds for the number of iterations taken to mix to a constrained distribution whose potential is relatively smooth, convex, and Lipschitz continuous with respect to a self-concordant mirror function. As a consequence of the reversibility of the Markov chain induced by the inclusion of the Metropolis-Hastings filter, we obtain an exponentially better dependence on the error tolerance for approximate constrained sampling. We also present numerical experiments that corroborate our theoretical findings.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a new method called the Metropolis-adjusted Mirror Langevin Algorithm (MAMLA) for approximate sampling from distributions with compact and convex support.
- MAMLA adds an accept-reject filter to the Markov chain induced by the Mirror Langevin Algorithm, making it unbiased relative to the target distribution.
- The paper provides upper bounds on the number of iterations needed for MAMLA to mix to a constrained distribution with relatively smooth, convex, and Lipschitz continuous potential with respect to a self-concordant mirror function.
- The reversibility of the Markov chain induced by the Metropolis-Hastings filter leads to exponentially better dependence on the error tolerance for approximate constrained sampling.
- The paper presents numerical experiments that support the theoretical findings.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new method called the Metropolis-adjusted Mirror Langevin Algorithm (MAMLA) to help sample from distributions, which are mathematical models that describe the likelihood of different outcomes. Specifically, MAMLA is designed to work with distributions whose possible outcomes are limited to a certain area, known as a compact and convex set.
The key innovation of MAMLA is that it adds an "accept-reject" filter to a simpler algorithm called the Mirror Langevin Algorithm. This filter ensures that the samples produced by MAMLA are unbiased, meaning they accurately represent the target distribution, unlike the simpler algorithm which has some inherent bias.
The paper also shows that MAMLA can mix, or converge, to the target distribution relatively quickly, as long as the distribution has a potential function (a mathematical description of the distribution) that is smooth, convex, and satisfies certain other mathematical properties. The inclusion of the Metropolis-Hastings filter in MAMLA also leads to an exponential improvement in the accuracy of the samples compared to other methods.
Finally, the researchers present some numerical experiments that demonstrate the effectiveness of MAMLA in practice, supporting the theoretical claims made in the paper.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the Metropolis-adjusted Mirror Langevin Algorithm (MAMLA), which builds upon the Mirror Langevin Algorithm proposed by Zhang et al. (2020). MAMLA is designed for approximate sampling from distributions whose support is a compact and convex set.
MAMLA adds an accept-reject Metropolis-Hastings filter to the Markov chain induced by a single step of the Mirror Langevin Algorithm. This filter ensures that the resulting samples are unbiased with respect to the target distribution, in contrast to the Mirror Langevin Algorithm, which has an asymptotic bias.
The paper provides upper bounds on the number of iterations needed for MAMLA to mix, or converge, to a constrained distribution whose potential function is relatively smooth, convex, and Lipschitz continuous with respect to a self-concordant mirror function. This mathematical property ensures that the potential function behaves well and allows for efficient sampling.
Due to the reversibility of the Markov chain induced by the Metropolis-Hastings filter, the paper shows that MAMLA achieves an exponentially better dependence on the error tolerance for approximate constrained sampling compared to other methods, such as the Accelerating Approximate Thompson Sampling with Underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo and Non-log-concave Nonsmooth Sampling via Langevin algorithms.
The paper also presents numerical experiments that corroborate the theoretical findings, demonstrating the effectiveness of MAMLA in practice.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the MAMLA algorithm and its properties, which is a strength of the research. The authors have carefully addressed the issue of bias in the simpler Mirror Langevin Algorithm by introducing the Metropolis-Hastings filter, and they have shown that this modification leads to exponential improvements in the accuracy of the samples.
However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or areas for further research in depth. For example, it would be helpful to know how the performance of MAMLA compares to other state-of-the-art methods for constrained sampling, particularly in terms of computational efficiency and practical considerations.
Additionally, the paper focuses on distributions with relatively smooth, convex, and Lipschitz continuous potential functions. It would be interesting to see how MAMLA performs on more challenging distributions, such as those with non-convex or non-smooth potentials, or with more complex geometric constraints on the support.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of approximate sampling algorithms, but further research and comparison to other methods could help to better understand the strengths, limitations, and broader applicability of MAMLA.
Conclusion
The Metropolis-adjusted Mirror Langevin Algorithm (MAMLA) proposed in this paper is a new method for approximate sampling from distributions with compact and convex support. By adding an accept-reject Metropolis-Hastings filter to the Mirror Langevin Algorithm, MAMLA produces unbiased samples and achieves exponentially better dependence on the error tolerance compared to other Langevin-based sampling algorithms.
The theoretical analysis provided in the paper demonstrates the favorable mixing properties of MAMLA and its ability to efficiently sample from distributions with relatively smooth, convex, and Lipschitz continuous potential functions. The numerical experiments further validate the effectiveness of the algorithm in practice.
While the paper focuses on a specific class of distributions, the MAMLA method represents an important advancement in the field of constrained sampling, with potential applications in areas such as Bayesian inference, optimization, and reinforcement learning. Future research exploring the performance of MAMLA on a wider range of distributions and comparing it to other state-of-the-art techniques could provide valuable insights and further expand the practical utility of this algorithm.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐ธ
Penalized Overdamped and Underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms for Constrained Sampling
Mert Gurbuzbalaban, Yuanhan Hu, Lingjiong Zhu
0
0
We consider the constrained sampling problem where the goal is to sample from a target distribution $pi(x)propto e^{-f(x)}$ when $x$ is constrained to lie on a convex body $mathcal{C}$. Motivated by penalty methods from continuous optimization, we propose penalized Langevin Dynamics (PLD) and penalized underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo (PULMC) methods that convert the constrained sampling problem into an unconstrained sampling problem by introducing a penalty function for constraint violations. When $f$ is smooth and gradients are available, we get $tilde{mathcal{O}}(d/varepsilon^{10})$ iteration complexity for PLD to sample the target up to an $varepsilon$-error where the error is measured in the TV distance and $tilde{mathcal{O}}(cdot)$ hides logarithmic factors. For PULMC, we improve the result to $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{d}/varepsilon^{7})$ when the Hessian of $f$ is Lipschitz and the boundary of $mathcal{C}$ is sufficiently smooth. To our knowledge, these are the first convergence results for underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo methods in the constrained sampling that handle non-convex $f$ and provide guarantees with the best dimension dependency among existing methods with deterministic gradient. If unbiased stochastic estimates of the gradient of $f$ are available, we propose PSGLD and PSGULMC methods that can handle stochastic gradients and are scaleable to large datasets without requiring Metropolis-Hasting correction steps. For PSGLD and PSGULMC, when $f$ is strongly convex and smooth, we obtain $tilde{mathcal{O}}(d/varepsilon^{18})$ and $tilde{mathcal{O}}(dsqrt{d}/varepsilon^{39})$ iteration complexity in W2 distance. When $f$ is smooth and can be non-convex, we provide finite-time performance bounds and iteration complexity results. Finally, we illustrate the performance on Bayesian LASSO regression and Bayesian constrained deep learning problems.
4/16/2024
๐ฌ
Non-Log-Concave and Nonsmooth Sampling via Langevin Monte Carlo Algorithms
Tim Tsz-Kit Lau, Han Liu, Thomas Pock
0
0
We study the problem of approximate sampling from non-log-concave distributions, e.g., Gaussian mixtures, which is often challenging even in low dimensions due to their multimodality. We focus on performing this task via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods derived from discretizations of the overdamped Langevin diffusions, which are commonly known as Langevin Monte Carlo algorithms. Furthermore, we are also interested in two nonsmooth cases for which a large class of proximal MCMC methods have been developed: (i) a nonsmooth prior is considered with a Gaussian mixture likelihood; (ii) a Laplacian mixture distribution. Such nonsmooth and non-log-concave sampling tasks arise from a wide range of applications to Bayesian inference and imaging inverse problems such as image deconvolution. We perform numerical simulations to compare the performance of most commonly used Langevin Monte Carlo algorithms.
5/30/2024
๐
Accelerating Approximate Thompson Sampling with Underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo
Haoyang Zheng, Wei Deng, Christian Moya, Guang Lin
0
0
Approximate Thompson sampling with Langevin Monte Carlo broadens its reach from Gaussian posterior sampling to encompass more general smooth posteriors. However, it still encounters scalability issues in high-dimensional problems when demanding high accuracy. To address this, we propose an approximate Thompson sampling strategy, utilizing underdamped Langevin Monte Carlo, where the latter is the go-to workhorse for simulations of high-dimensional posteriors. Based on the standard smoothness and log-concavity conditions, we study the accelerated posterior concentration and sampling using a specific potential function. This design improves the sample complexity for realizing logarithmic regrets from $mathcal{tilde O}(d)$ to $mathcal{tilde O}(sqrt{d})$. The scalability and robustness of our algorithm are also empirically validated through synthetic experiments in high-dimensional bandit problems.
6/24/2024
Tamed Langevin sampling under weaker conditions
Iosif Lytras, Panayotis Mertikopoulos
0
0
Motivated by applications to deep learning which often fail standard Lipschitz smoothness requirements, we examine the problem of sampling from distributions that are not log-concave and are only weakly dissipative, with log-gradients allowed to grow superlinearly at infinity. In terms of structure, we only assume that the target distribution satisfies either a log-Sobolev or a Poincar'e inequality and a local Lipschitz smoothness assumption with modulus growing possibly polynomially at infinity. This set of assumptions greatly exceeds the operational limits of the vanilla unadjusted Langevin algorithm (ULA), making sampling from such distributions a highly involved affair. To account for this, we introduce a taming scheme which is tailored to the growth and decay properties of the target distribution, and we provide explicit non-asymptotic guarantees for the proposed sampler in terms of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, total variation, and Wasserstein distance to the target distribution.
5/29/2024