Federated Multi-Armed Bandits Under Byzantine Attacks

Overview

• The paper explores the problem of Federated Multi-Armed Bandits (FMAB), where a group of learners with heterogeneous local models play a multi-armed bandit game and communicate their aggregated feedback to a server to learn a globally optimal arm.
• Two key challenges in FMAB are communication-efficient learning and resilience to adversarial attacks from Byzantine clients who can send false model updates.
• The paper proposes a median-of-means (MoM)-based online algorithm, Fed-MoM-UCB, to address these challenges, showing that it can achieve bounded cumulative regret over time with high probability if the Byzantine clients constitute less than half the cohort.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a problem called Federated Multi-Armed Bandits (FMAB), which is a way for a group of learners to work together to find the best option (or "arm") to choose from.

In FMAB, each learner has their own local model, and they all play a multi-armed bandit game, where they have to decide which "arm" (or option) to "pull" (or choose) in order to maximize their cumulative reward. The learners then communicate their feedback to a central server, which tries to find the globally optimal arm.

The key challenges in FMAB are: 1) doing this in a way that minimizes the amount of communication needed, and 2) making the system resilient to attacks from "Byzantine" clients, who might try to send false information to the server and disrupt the learning process.

To address these challenges, the paper proposes a new algorithm called Fed-MoM-UCB, which uses a technique called "median-of-means" to protect against the influence of the Byzantine clients. The paper shows that as long as the Byzantine clients don't make up more than half the group, Fed-MoM-UCB can still achieve good performance in terms of the cumulative reward over time.

The paper also explores how the different parameters of the algorithm, the "discernibility margin" (how easy it is to tell the good arms from the bad ones), and the suboptimality gaps (how much worse the bad arms are than the good ones) all interact to affect the regret (how much worse the algorithm does compared to the optimal strategy), the communication cost, and the system's resilience to attacks.

Technical Explanation

The paper formulates the Federated Multi-Armed Bandits (FMAB) problem, where a cohort of learners with heterogeneous local models play a multi-armed bandit (MAB) game and communicate their aggregated feedback to a server to learn a globally optimal arm.

Two key challenges in FMAB are communication-efficient learning and resilience to adversarial attacks from Byzantine clients who can send false model updates. To address these issues, the authors borrow tools from robust statistics and propose a median-of-means (MoM)-based online algorithm, Fed-MoM-UCB.

Fed-MoM-UCB works as follows: each client maintains its own Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) estimates for the arms, and periodically communicates a summary of these estimates to the server. The server then aggregates the client estimates using a median-of-means approach to obtain a robust global estimate, which is used to select the arm to pull.

The authors analyze the sample complexity and regret of β-optimal arm identification for Fed-MoM-UCB. They show that if the Byzantine clients constitute less than half of the cohort, the cumulative regret with respect to β-optimal arms is bounded over time with high probability. This demonstrates both communication efficiency and Byzantine resilience.

The analysis also explores the interplay between algorithm parameters, the discernibility margin, regret, communication cost, and the arms' suboptimality gaps. Experiments validate Fed-MoM-UCB's effectiveness against baseline approaches in the presence of Byzantine attacks.

Critical Analysis

The paper addresses an important challenge in the emerging field of Federated Multi-Armed Bandits (FMAB), namely protecting the learning process from adversarial attacks by Byzantine clients. The proposed Fed-MoM-UCB algorithm is a novel and promising approach that leverages tools from robust statistics to achieve both communication-efficient learning and resilience to Byzantine attacks.

One potential limitation of the work is that it assumes the Byzantine clients constitute less than half the cohort. In real-world scenarios, it may be difficult to ensure this condition is met, and the algorithm's performance in the presence of a majority of Byzantine clients is not explored. Further research could investigate more robust approaches that can handle a higher proportion of malicious clients.

Additionally, the paper's analysis focuses on regret bounds and sample complexity for β-optimal arm identification. While this is a important theoretical result, it would be valuable to also understand the algorithm's practical performance in terms of actual reward maximization and its scalability to larger problem instances.

Finally, the paper does not discuss the potential implications or societal impact of this research. As FMAB systems become more widely adopted, it will be important to consider how they can be designed and deployed in a way that is ethical, transparent, and beneficial to all stakeholders.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel approach to the Federated Multi-Armed Bandits (FMAB) problem, which aims to allow a group of learners to collaboratively identify the optimal option to choose while being resilient to adversarial attacks. The proposed Fed-MoM-UCB algorithm leverages robust statistical techniques to achieve both communication-efficient learning and Byzantine resilience, as long as the Byzantine clients constitute less than half the cohort.

This research advances the state-of-the-art in multi-agent decision-making under uncertainty and has the potential to enable more secure and effective collaborative learning systems. However, further work is needed to address the algorithm's limitations and explore the broader implications of FMAB technology. As this field continues to evolve, it will be crucial to consider not just the technical capabilities, but also the ethical and societal ramifications of these powerful machine learning tools.