A First Look at Selection Bias in Preference Elicitation for Recommendation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the issue of selection bias in preference elicitation for recommendation systems.
- It explores how the process of obtaining user preferences can introduce biases that impact the quality and fairness of the resulting recommendations.
- The paper proposes approaches to correct for these biases and mitigate their effects on the recommendation process.
Plain English Explanation
Recommendation systems are algorithms that suggest products, content, or services to users based on their preferences and behaviors. These systems rely on understanding user preferences, which are often obtained through preference elicitation - where users are asked to rate or rank items.
However, the process of eliciting preferences can introduce biases. For example, users may be more likely to rate items they are already familiar with or interested in, leading to a skewed representation of their true preferences. This selection bias can then cause the recommendation system to make suboptimal or unfair suggestions.
The paper explores ways to correct for this selection bias and ensure that the preference data better reflects the users' underlying preferences. This could involve techniques like compensating for cognitive load or addressing group membership biases in the preference elicitation process.
By correcting for these biases, the recommendation system can provide more accurate and fair suggestions to users, improving their overall experience and satisfaction.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by highlighting the importance of understanding and addressing selection bias in preference elicitation for recommendation systems. It notes that the process of obtaining user preferences can introduce systematic biases, leading to recommendation results that do not accurately reflect the users' true preferences.
The authors propose several approaches to correct for selection bias in preference elicitation. One key idea is to model the selection process itself, which can help account for the factors that influence a user's decision to rate or rank certain items. This could involve incorporating information about the user's familiarity, interest, or cognitive load when evaluating the preference data.
The paper also discusses the impact of group membership biases, where users' preferences may be influenced by their belonging to particular social or demographic groups. Techniques to address these biases, such as compensating for cognitive load or going beyond popularity-based recommendations, are presented as potential solutions.
Through a series of experiments and analyses, the authors demonstrate the benefits of their proposed approaches in improving the quality and fairness of recommendation systems, particularly when dealing with selection bias in preference elicitation.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of recommendation systems by highlighting the critical issue of selection bias and proposing methods to address it. The authors' focus on the preference elicitation process is well-justified, as this is a crucial step in building effective recommendation systems.
However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations of the proposed approaches. For example, the techniques for modeling the selection process and compensating for biases may rely on certain assumptions or require additional data that may not be readily available in all scenarios. The paper could have explored the practical challenges and trade-offs involved in implementing these solutions in real-world settings.
Additionally, the paper could have discussed the broader implications of selection bias in recommendation systems, such as its impact on the quality and fairness of recommendations for different user groups or the potential for these biases to perpetuate existing societal biases.
Overall, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding and addressing selection bias in preference elicitation, but further research and discussions on the practical and ethical considerations would be valuable for the field.
Conclusion
This paper offers a critical examination of the selection bias that can arise in the preference elicitation process for recommendation systems. By highlighting this issue and proposing techniques to correct for these biases, the authors contribute to the ongoing efforts to improve the accuracy, fairness, and user experience of recommendation systems.
The proposed approaches, such as modeling the selection process and compensating for cognitive load and group membership biases, demonstrate the potential to mitigate the negative effects of selection bias and deliver more reliable and equitable recommendations. As the field of recommendation systems continues to evolve, addressing these fundamental challenges in preference elicitation will be crucial for developing systems that truly serve the needs and preferences of all users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A First Look at Selection Bias in Preference Elicitation for Recommendation
Shashank Gupta, Harrie Oosterhuis, Maarten de Rijke
Preference elicitation explicitly asks users what kind of recommendations they would like to receive. It is a popular technique for conversational recommender systems to deal with cold-starts. Previous work has studied selection bias in implicit feedback, e.g., clicks, and in some forms of explicit feedback, i.e., ratings on items. Despite the fact that the extreme sparsity of preference elicitation interactions make them severely more prone to selection bias than natural interactions, the effect of selection bias in preference elicitation on the resulting recommendations has not been studied yet. To address this gap, we take a first look at the effects of selection bias in preference elicitation and how they may be further investigated in the future. We find that a big hurdle is the current lack of any publicly available dataset that has preference elicitation interactions. As a solution, we propose a simulation of a topic-based preference elicitation process. The results from our simulation-based experiments indicate (i) that ignoring the effect of selection bias early in preference elicitation can lead to an exacerbation of overrepresentation in subsequent item recommendations, and (ii) that debiasing methods can alleviate this effect, which leads to significant improvements in subsequent item recommendation performance. Our aim is for the proposed simulator and initial results to provide a starting point and motivation for future research into this important but overlooked problem setting.
Read more5/2/2024
0
Greedy SLIM: A SLIM-Based Approach For Preference Elicitation
Claudius Proissl, Amel Vatic, Helmut Waldschmidt
Preference elicitation is an active learning approach to tackle the cold-start problem of recommender systems. Roughly speaking, new users are asked to rate some carefully selected items in order to compute appropriate recommendations for them. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to propose a method for preference elicitation that is based on SLIM , a state-of-the-art technique for top-N recommendation. Our approach mainly consists of a new training technique for SLIM, which we call Greedy SLIM. This technique iteratively selects items for the training in order to minimize the SLIM loss greedily. We conduct offline experiments as well as a user study to assess the performance of this new method. The results are remarkable, especially with respect to the user study. We conclude that Greedy SLIM seems to be more suitable for preference elicitation than widely used methods based on latent factor models.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Cold-start Recommendation by Personalized Embedding Region Elicitation
Hieu Trung Nguyen, Duy Nguyen, Khoa Doan, Viet Anh Nguyen
Rating elicitation is a success element for recommender systems to perform well at cold-starting, in which the systems need to recommend items to a newly arrived user with no prior knowledge about the user's preference. Existing elicitation methods employ a fixed set of items to learn the user's preference and then infer the users' preferences on the remaining items. Using a fixed seed set can limit the performance of the recommendation system since the seed set is unlikely optimal for all new users with potentially diverse preferences. This paper addresses this challenge using a 2-phase, personalized elicitation scheme. First, the elicitation scheme asks users to rate a small set of popular items in a ``burn-in'' phase. Second, it sequentially asks the user to rate adaptive items to refine the preference and the user's representation. Throughout the process, the system represents the user's embedding value not by a point estimate but by a region estimate. The value of information obtained by asking the user's rating on an item is quantified by the distance from the region center embedding space that contains with high confidence the true embedding value of the user. Finally, the recommendations are successively generated by considering the preference region of the user. We show that each subproblem in the elicitation scheme can be efficiently implemented. Further, we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method against existing rating-elicitation methods on several prominent datasets.
Read more6/4/2024
0
The Importance of Cognitive Biases in the Recommendation Ecosystem
Markus Schedl, Oleg Lesota, Stefan Brandl, Mohammad Lotfi, Gustavo Junior Escobedo Ticona, Shahed Masoudian
Cognitive biases have been studied in psychology, sociology, and behavioral economics for decades. Traditionally, they have been considered a negative human trait that leads to inferior decision-making, reinforcement of stereotypes, or can be exploited to manipulate consumers, respectively. We argue that cognitive biases also manifest in different parts of the recommendation ecosystem and at different stages of the recommendation process. More importantly, we contest this traditional detrimental perspective on cognitive biases and claim that certain cognitive biases can be beneficial when accounted for by recommender systems. Concretely, we provide empirical evidence that biases such as feature-positive effect, Ikea effect, and cultural homophily can be observed in various components of the recommendation pipeline, including input data (such as ratings or side information), recommendation algorithm or model (and consequently recommended items), and user interactions with the system. In three small experiments covering recruitment and entertainment domains, we study the pervasiveness of the aforementioned biases. We ultimately advocate for a prejudice-free consideration of cognitive biases to improve user and item models as well as recommendation algorithms.
Read more9/2/2024