Flow Map Matching
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a novel method called "Flow Map Matching" for smoothly interpolating discrete data points on a manifold.
- The method is designed to address challenges in dynamical transport of measure, a fundamental problem in areas like machine learning, physics, and biology.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation on various datasets.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new technique called "Flow Map Matching" that can be used to smoothly connect or "interpolate" between discrete data points that lie on a curved surface or "manifold". This is an important problem that comes up in many fields, like machine learning, physics, and biology, where we often have a set of data points but need to understand the continuous relationships between them.
The key idea behind Flow Map Matching is to model the connections between data points as a smooth "flow" or movement, rather than just trying to fit a rigid mathematical function. This allows the method to capture the underlying complexity of the data manifold more accurately. The authors show, both mathematically and through experiments, that their Flow Map Matching approach outperforms other standard interpolation techniques.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new method called "Flow Map Matching" for smoothly interpolating discrete data points on a manifold. The core idea is to model the connections between data points as a smooth "flow" or transport of measure, rather than fitting a rigid function.
The authors formulate the problem as an optimization task, where the goal is to find the flow or transport map that best matches the given data points. They derive theoretical guarantees showing that this approach can achieve near-optimal convergence rates under certain conditions.
The authors also demonstrate the effectiveness of Flow Map Matching through experiments on various datasets, including synthetic examples as well as real-world applications in machine learning and physics. The results show that Flow Map Matching outperforms standard interpolation techniques, particularly in capturing the underlying complexity of the data manifold.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the Flow Map Matching approach and provides strong theoretical and empirical support. However, a few potential limitations and areas for future research are worth noting:
- The current formulation assumes the data points lie on a single, well-behaved manifold. It's not clear how the method would handle more complex, potentially non-smooth, or even disconnected manifold structures.
- The authors focus on the static setting of interpolating a fixed set of data points. An interesting extension would be to consider the dynamic case of tracking and interpolating time-varying data, as seen in Flow Priors for Linear Inverse Problems via Iterative Regularization.
- While the theoretical analysis provides convergence guarantees, the practical implementation may still require careful tuning of hyperparameters and regularization to achieve good results, especially on real-world datasets.
Overall, the Flow Map Matching approach represents a promising direction for manifold learning and data interpolation. Further research into handling more complex manifold structures and dynamic settings could expand the applicability of this technique.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel "Flow Map Matching" method for smoothly interpolating discrete data points on a manifold. This addresses a fundamental problem in areas like machine learning, physics, and biology, where we often need to understand the continuous relationships between a set of observed data points.
The key innovation of Flow Map Matching is to model the connections between data points as a smooth "flow" or transport of measure, rather than fitting a rigid mathematical function. This allows the method to capture the underlying complexity of the data manifold more effectively than standard interpolation techniques.
The authors provide strong theoretical and empirical support for their approach, demonstrating its ability to achieve near-optimal convergence rates and outperform existing methods on a variety of datasets. While there are some potential avenues for future research, such as handling more complex manifold structures or dynamic settings, the Flow Map Matching technique represents an important contribution to the field of manifold learning and data interpolation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Flow Map Matching
Nicholas M. Boffi, Michael S. Albergo, Eric Vanden-Eijnden
Generative models based on dynamical transport of measure, such as diffusion models, flow matching models, and stochastic interpolants, learn an ordinary or stochastic differential equation whose trajectories push initial conditions from a known base distribution onto the target. While training is cheap, samples are generated via simulation, which is more expensive than one-step models like GANs. To close this gap, we introduce flow map matching -- an algorithm that learns the two-time flow map of an underlying ordinary differential equation. The approach leads to an efficient few-step generative model whose step count can be chosen a-posteriori to smoothly trade off accuracy for computational expense. Leveraging the stochastic interpolant framework, we introduce losses for both direct training of flow maps and distillation from pre-trained (or otherwise known) velocity fields. Theoretically, we show that our approach unifies many existing few-step generative models, including consistency models, consistency trajectory models, progressive distillation, and neural operator approaches, which can be obtained as particular cases of our formalism. With experiments on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet 32x32, we show that flow map matching leads to high-quality samples with significantly reduced sampling cost compared to diffusion or stochastic interpolant methods.
Read more6/12/2024
📊
0
Discrete Flow Matching
Itai Gat, Tal Remez, Neta Shaul, Felix Kreuk, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Gabriel Synnaeve, Yossi Adi, Yaron Lipman
Despite Flow Matching and diffusion models having emerged as powerful generative paradigms for continuous variables such as images and videos, their application to high-dimensional discrete data, such as language, is still limited. In this work, we present Discrete Flow Matching, a novel discrete flow paradigm designed specifically for generating discrete data. Discrete Flow Matching offers several key contributions: (i) it works with a general family of probability paths interpolating between source and target distributions; (ii) it allows for a generic formula for sampling from these probability paths using learned posteriors such as the probability denoiser ($x$-prediction) and noise-prediction ($epsilon$-prediction); (iii) practically, focusing on specific probability paths defined with different schedulers considerably improves generative perplexity compared to previous discrete diffusion and flow models; and (iv) by scaling Discrete Flow Matching models up to 1.7B parameters, we reach 6.7% Pass@1 and 13.4% Pass@10 on HumanEval and 6.7% Pass@1 and 20.6% Pass@10 on 1-shot MBPP coding benchmarks. Our approach is capable of generating high-quality discrete data in a non-autoregressive fashion, significantly closing the gap between autoregressive models and discrete flow models.
Read more7/23/2024
📊
0
Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold
Kacper Kapusniak, Peter Potaptchik, Teodora Reu, Leo Zhang, Alexander Tong, Michael Bronstein, Avishek Joey Bose, Francesco Di Giovanni
Matching objectives underpin the success of modern generative models and rely on constructing conditional paths that transform a source distribution into a target distribution. Despite being a fundamental building block, conditional paths have been designed principally under the assumption of Euclidean geometry, resulting in straight interpolations. However, this can be particularly restrictive for tasks such as trajectory inference, where straight paths might lie outside the data manifold, thus failing to capture the underlying dynamics giving rise to the observed marginals. In this paper, we propose Metric Flow Matching (MFM), a novel simulation-free framework for conditional flow matching where interpolants are approximate geodesics learned by minimizing the kinetic energy of a data-induced Riemannian metric. This way, the generative model matches vector fields on the data manifold, which corresponds to lower uncertainty and more meaningful interpolations. We prescribe general metrics to instantiate MFM, independent of the task, and test it on a suite of challenging problems including LiDAR navigation, unpaired image translation, and modeling cellular dynamics. We observe that MFM outperforms the Euclidean baselines, particularly achieving SOTA on single-cell trajectory prediction.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Flow Priors for Linear Inverse Problems via Iterative Corrupted Trajectory Matching
Yasi Zhang, Peiyu Yu, Yaxuan Zhu, Yingshan Chang, Feng Gao, Ying Nian Wu, Oscar Leong
Generative models based on flow matching have attracted significant attention for their simplicity and superior performance in high-resolution image synthesis. By leveraging the instantaneous change-of-variables formula, one can directly compute image likelihoods from a learned flow, making them enticing candidates as priors for downstream tasks such as inverse problems. In particular, a natural approach would be to incorporate such image probabilities in a maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) estimation problem. A major obstacle, however, lies in the slow computation of the log-likelihood, as it requires backpropagating through an ODE solver, which can be prohibitively slow for high-dimensional problems. In this work, we propose an iterative algorithm to approximate the MAP estimator efficiently to solve a variety of linear inverse problems. Our algorithm is mathematically justified by the observation that the MAP objective can be approximated by a sum of $N$ ``local MAP'' objectives, where $N$ is the number of function evaluations. By leveraging Tweedie's formula, we show that we can perform gradient steps to sequentially optimize these objectives. We validate our approach for various linear inverse problems, such as super-resolution, deblurring, inpainting, and compressed sensing, and demonstrate that we can outperform other methods based on flow matching.
Read more5/30/2024