Formal Semantic Geometry over Transformer-based Variational AutoEncoder

Overview

• This paper explores how to inject formal, symbolic semantics into current distributional sentence representations to improve the control and interpretability of language models (LMs).
• The authors propose a theoretical framework that represents sentence semantics as the composition of [semantic role - word content] features, and introduce a formal semantic geometry.
• To incorporate this geometry into Transformer-based LMs like GPT-2, the authors use a Transformer-based Variational AutoEncoder with a supervision approach, allowing sentence generation to be manipulated and explained in a low-dimensional latent Gaussian space.
• They also propose a new probing algorithm to guide the movement of sentence vectors within this semantic geometry.
• The results suggest that this formal semantic geometry can potentially deliver better control and interpretation of sentence generation.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a problem with current language models (LMs) like GPT-2. These models generate text by learning patterns in a large amount of online data, but the way they represent the meaning, or semantics, of sentences is not very well-defined or easy to control.

The authors propose a new way to represent sentence semantics that is more structured and interpretable. They break down the meaning of a sentence into two key components: the semantic roles of the words (e.g. subject, object, etc.) and the actual content of the words. This forms a "semantic geometry" that can be incorporated into the LM.

By adding this semantic geometry to a Transformer-based LM, the authors show they can better manipulate and explain the generation of new sentences. The model can now generate sentences while explicitly controlling the semantic roles and content, making the output more predictable and interpretable.

This approach could lead to language models that are more controllable and transparent, allowing users to better understand how the model is generating text and to steer it in desired directions. This could be useful for applications like [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/transformer-aided-semantic-communications]semantic communication[/internal link] or [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/understanding-effect-using-semantically-meaningful-tokens-visual]visual semantic grounding[/internal link].

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a theoretical framework to represent sentence semantics as the composition of semantic role and word content features. This forms a formal semantic geometry that the authors aim to inject into Transformer-based LMs like GPT-2.

To do this, they deploy a Transformer-based Variational AutoEncoder with a supervision approach. This allows the sentence generation process to be manipulated and explained within a low-dimensional latent Gaussian space that encodes the semantic geometry.

The authors also introduce a new probing algorithm to guide the movement of sentence vectors within this semantic geometry. This helps ensure the latent space captures the desired semantic structure.

Experiments show that incorporating this formal semantic geometry can potentially deliver better control and interpretation of sentence generation compared to standard Transformer LMs. The structured semantic representation allows the model to generate text while explicitly accounting for semantic roles and content.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving the controllability and interpretability of language models. Incorporating a more formal, structured representation of semantics is an interesting direction that could lead to more transparent and steerable text generation.

However, the paper does not provide a thorough evaluation of the practical benefits and limitations of this approach. The experiments are limited in scope, and the authors do not fully address potential drawbacks or challenges with implementing this semantic geometry in real-world applications.

For example, the paper does not discuss how well this approach scales to longer, more complex sentences, or how it might perform on open-ended generation tasks beyond the specific probing experiments. There are also open questions about the robustness of the semantic geometry and how sensitive it might be to shifts in the underlying data distribution.

Further research would be needed to fully assess the practical value and generalizability of this framework. Careful analysis of the tradeoffs, edge cases, and potential failure modes would help contextualize the significance of the authors' contributions. [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/do-sentence-transformers-learn-quasi-geospatial-concepts]Existing work on related concepts like geometric representations of sentence meaning[/internal link] could also provide helpful points of comparison.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to incorporating formal, symbolic semantics into the distributed representations used by modern language models. By framing sentence meaning as the composition of semantic roles and word content, the authors develop a "semantic geometry" that can be injected into Transformer-based text generation models.

This structured semantic representation allows for better control and interpretability of the language model's output, potentially enabling more transparent and steerable text generation. While the paper demonstrates promising initial results, further research is needed to fully assess the practical benefits and limitations of this approach.

Overall, the work represents an interesting step towards building language models that are more aligned with human intuitions about meaning and can be more reliably leveraged in real-world applications, such as [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/learning-disentangled-semantic-spaces-explanations-via-invertible]semantic communication[/internal link] or [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/gta-geometry-aware-attention-mechanism-multi-view]visual grounding[/internal link].