Fully Authentic Visual Question Answering Dataset from Online Communities

Overview

• This paper introduces a new large-scale visual question answering (VQA) dataset called "Fully Authentic Visual Question Answering Dataset from Online Communities" (FAVQAD), which is collected from online forums and communities.
• The dataset aims to provide more realistic and diverse VQA samples compared to existing synthetic datasets.
• The authors conduct extensive experiments to benchmark the performance of state-of-the-art VQA models on this new dataset.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers created a new dataset for training and testing visual question answering (VQA) systems. VQA is the task of answering questions about images.

Existing VQA datasets are often created artificially, with the questions and answers written by researchers. In contrast, this new dataset, called FAVQAD, collects real questions and answers from online forums and communities. This makes the dataset more authentic and diverse, reflecting the kinds of questions real people ask about images.

The researchers benchmarked how well current VQA models perform on this new dataset, to understand how well these models can handle more realistic and varied questions compared to synthetic datasets. This provides valuable insights into the current state of VQA technology and where more progress is needed.

Technical Explanation

The authors introduce the FAVQAD dataset, which contains over 1 million visual question-answer pairs collected from online forums and communities. This is in contrast to existing VQA datasets like VQAv2, VizWiz, and TDIUC, which are created artificially by researchers.

The authors argue that FAVQAD provides a more realistic and diverse set of VQA samples, as the questions and answers reflect the actual information needs and perspectives of online users. They benchmark several state-of-the-art VQA models on FAVQAD and compare the results to their performance on existing datasets. The findings suggest that current VQA models struggle to generalize to the more challenging, open-ended questions in FAVQAD compared to the more constrained questions in synthetic datasets.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several limitations of the FAVQAD dataset, such as potential noise and biases in the crowdsourced data, as well as the difficulty of automatically evaluating the open-ended nature of the questions and answers. They also note that the dataset may not be representative of all online communities, as it is collected from a specific set of forums.

Additionally, while the dataset provides a more realistic benchmark for VQA systems, it is unclear how well the models would perform on downstream real-world applications. Further research is needed to understand how to best leverage this dataset to drive progress in building more robust and generalizable VQA systems.

Conclusion

The FAVQAD dataset introduced in this paper represents an important step towards more realistic and diverse visual question answering benchmarks. By collecting questions and answers from online communities, the dataset reflects the actual information needs and perspectives of users, rather than the more constrained and synthetic samples in existing VQA datasets.

The performance gap between current VQA models on FAVQAD compared to prior datasets highlights the need for continued research to develop systems that can handle the open-ended, noisy, and diverse nature of real-world visual questions. Leveraging this dataset and others like it can help drive progress towards building VQA systems that are more robust and applicable to real-world scenarios.