Gaussian-Smoothed Sliced Probability Divergences

Read original: arXiv:2404.03273 - Published 4/26/2024 by Mokhtar Z. Alaya (LMAC), Alain Rakotomamonjy (LITIS), Maxime Berar (LITIS), Gilles Gasso (LITIS)
Total Score

0

Gaussian-Smoothed Sliced Probability Divergences

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces Gaussian-Smoothed Sliced Probability Divergences (GSPD), a new method for comparing probability distributions.
  • GSPD aims to provide a more robust and reliable way to measure distributional differences compared to previous approaches.
  • The method involves smoothing the probability distributions using Gaussian kernels and then computing sliced divergences along random directions.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of GSPD on various tasks, including generative model evaluation and distribution learning.

Plain English Explanation

Comparing probability distributions is an important task in many areas of machine learning and data analysis. For example, you might want to measure the difference between the distribution of heights in a sample of adults and the distribution of heights in a sample of children.

Previous methods for comparing distributions, such as the Kullback-Leibler divergence, can be sensitive to noise and outliers in the data. The new GSPD method introduced in this paper aims to address these limitations.

The key idea behind GSPD is to first "smooth out" the probability distributions using Gaussian kernels. This helps to reduce the impact of noise and outliers. Then, the method computes "sliced" divergences along random directions through the distributions. Averaging these sliced divergences provides a robust and reliable measure of the overall difference between the distributions.

The authors show that GSPD outperforms previous methods on a variety of tasks, including evaluating the performance of generative models and learning probability distributions from data. This suggests that GSPD could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working with probability distributions in machine learning and statistics.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Gaussian-Smoothed Sliced Probability Divergences (GSPD), a new method for comparing probability distributions. The core idea is to apply Gaussian smoothing to the probability distributions and then compute sliced divergences along random directions.

Formally, given two probability distributions P and Q, the GSPD between them is defined as:

GSPD(P, Q) = E_u[D(P_u, Q_u)]

Where:

  • P_u and Q_u are the one-dimensional projections of P and Q along a random direction u
  • D(·, ·) is a divergence measure (e.g. Wasserstein distance) applied to the projected distributions

The Gaussian smoothing helps to reduce the sensitivity of the divergence measure to noise and outliers in the data. The authors show that GSPD can be efficiently computed using Monte Carlo sampling of the random directions u.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of GSPD on several tasks, including:

  • Generative model evaluation: GSPD is used to assess the quality of samples generated by implicit generative models.
  • Distribution learning: GSPD is used as a training objective for learning probability distributions from data.
  • Density estimation: GSPD is used to compare the estimated density of a model to the true data distribution.

The results show that GSPD outperforms previous divergence measures, such as Wasserstein distance and kernel-based MMD, on these tasks. The authors also provide theoretical analysis and insights into the properties of GSPD.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the GSPD method, demonstrating its advantages over previous approaches. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:

  1. The choice of the Gaussian kernel bandwidth in the smoothing step is crucial, and the authors acknowledge that this hyperparameter can significantly impact the performance of GSPD. More research is needed to develop principled methods for automatically selecting the optimal bandwidth.

  2. While the authors show that GSPD is more robust to noise and outliers than other divergence measures, the method still relies on Monte Carlo sampling of random directions. This could be computationally expensive, especially for high-dimensional probability distributions.

  3. The paper focuses on evaluating GSPD on synthetic and relatively simple datasets. Further research is needed to assess the method's performance on more complex, real-world distributions encountered in practical applications.

  4. The theoretical analysis provided in the paper is limited to certain special cases and could be expanded to gain a deeper understanding of the properties and limitations of GSPD.

Overall, the GSPD method appears to be a promising approach for robust comparison of probability distributions, but additional research is needed to address the potential limitations and expand its applicability to more diverse and challenging scenarios.

Conclusion

The Gaussian-Smoothed Sliced Probability Divergences (GSPD) introduced in this paper offer a new and more robust way to compare probability distributions, with applications in areas such as generative model evaluation and distribution learning. By incorporating Gaussian smoothing and sliced divergences, GSPD demonstrates superior performance over previous divergence measures, particularly in the presence of noise and outliers.

The technical details and evaluations provided in the paper suggest that GSPD could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working with probability distributions in machine learning and statistics. The method's ability to reliably quantify distributional differences could have important implications for a wide range of applications, from anomaly detection to model interpretability.

While the paper identifies a few areas for further research, such as the choice of kernel bandwidth and computational efficiency, the GSPD approach represents an important step forward in the field of distributional comparison. As machine learning models continue to grow in complexity and real-world applications, robust and reliable techniques like GSPD will become increasingly crucial for advancing the state of the art.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Gaussian-Smoothed Sliced Probability Divergences
Total Score

0

Gaussian-Smoothed Sliced Probability Divergences

Mokhtar Z. Alaya (LMAC), Alain Rakotomamonjy (LITIS), Maxime Berar (LITIS), Gilles Gasso (LITIS)

Gaussian smoothed sliced Wasserstein distance has been recently introduced for comparing probability distributions, while preserving privacy on the data. It has been shown that it provides performances similar to its non-smoothed (non-private) counterpart. However, the computationaland statistical properties of such a metric have not yet been well-established. This work investigates the theoretical properties of this distance as well as those of generalized versions denoted as Gaussian-smoothed sliced divergences. We first show that smoothing and slicing preserve the metric property and the weak topology. To study the sample complexity of such divergences, we then introduce $hat{hatmu}_{n}$ the double empirical distribution for the smoothed-projected $mu$. The distribution $hat{hatmu}_{n}$ is a result of a double sampling process: one from sampling according to the origin distribution $mu$ and the second according to the convolution of the projection of $mu$ on the unit sphere and the Gaussian smoothing. We particularly focus on the Gaussian smoothed sliced Wasserstein distance and prove that it converges with a rate $O(n^{-1/2})$. We also derive other properties, including continuity, of different divergences with respect to the smoothing parameter. We support our theoretical findings with empirical studies in the context of privacy-preserving domain adaptation.

Read more

4/26/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Stereographic Spherical Sliced Wasserstein Distances

Huy Tran, Yikun Bai, Abihith Kothapalli, Ashkan Shahbazi, Xinran Liu, Rocio Diaz Martin, Soheil Kolouri

Comparing spherical probability distributions is of great interest in various fields, including geology, medical domains, computer vision, and deep representation learning. The utility of optimal transport-based distances, such as the Wasserstein distance, for comparing probability measures has spurred active research in developing computationally efficient variations of these distances for spherical probability measures. This paper introduces a high-speed and highly parallelizable distance for comparing spherical measures using the stereographic projection and the generalized Radon transform, which we refer to as the Stereographic Spherical Sliced Wasserstein (S3W) distance. We carefully address the distance distortion caused by the stereographic projection and provide an extensive theoretical analysis of our proposed metric and its rotationally invariant variation. Finally, we evaluate the performance of the proposed metrics and compare them with recent baselines in terms of both speed and accuracy through a wide range of numerical studies, including gradient flows and self-supervised learning. Our code is available at https://github.com/mint-vu/s3wd.

Read more

6/11/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Generalized Cauchy-Schwarz Divergence and Its Deep Learning Applications

Mingfei Lu, Chenxu Li, Shujian Yu, Robert Jenssen, Badong Chen

Divergence measures play a central role and become increasingly essential in deep learning, yet efficient measures for multiple (more than two) distributions are rarely explored. This becomes particularly crucial in areas where the simultaneous management of multiple distributions is both inevitable and essential. Examples include clustering, multi-source domain adaptation or generalization, and multi-view learning, among others. While computing the mean of pairwise distances between any two distributions is a prevalent method to quantify the total divergence among multiple distributions, it is imperative to acknowledge that this approach is not straightforward and necessitates significant computational resources. In this study, we introduce a new divergence measure tailored for multiple distributions named the generalized Cauchy-Schwarz divergence (GCSD). Additionally, we furnish a kernel-based closed-form sample estimator, making it convenient and straightforward to use in various machine-learning applications. Finally, we explore its profound implications in the realm of deep learning by applying it to tackle two thoughtfully chosen machine-learning tasks: deep clustering and multi-source domain adaptation. Our extensive experimental investigations confirm the robustness and effectiveness of GCSD in both scenarios. The findings also underscore the innovative potential of GCSD and its capability to significantly propel machine learning methodologies that necessitate the quantification of multiple distributions.

Read more

6/7/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Properties of Discrete Sliced Wasserstein Losses

Eloi Tanguy, R'emi Flamary, Julie Delon

The Sliced Wasserstein (SW) distance has become a popular alternative to the Wasserstein distance for comparing probability measures. Widespread applications include image processing, domain adaptation and generative modelling, where it is common to optimise some parameters in order to minimise SW, which serves as a loss function between discrete probability measures (since measures admitting densities are numerically unattainable). All these optimisation problems bear the same sub-problem, which is minimising the Sliced Wasserstein energy. In this paper we study the properties of $mathcal{E}: Y longmapsto mathrm{SW}_2^2(gamma_Y, gamma_Z)$, i.e. the SW distance between two uniform discrete measures with the same amount of points as a function of the support $Y in mathbb{R}^{n times d}$ of one of the measures. We investigate the regularity and optimisation properties of this energy, as well as its Monte-Carlo approximation $mathcal{E}_p$ (estimating the expectation in SW using only $p$ samples) and show convergence results on the critical points of $mathcal{E}_p$ to those of $mathcal{E}$, as well as an almost-sure uniform convergence and a uniform Central Limit result on the process $mathcal{E}_p(Y)$. Finally, we show that in a certain sense, Stochastic Gradient Descent methods minimising $mathcal{E}$ and $mathcal{E}_p$ converge towards (Clarke) critical points of these energies.

Read more

5/14/2024