A Generalization Bound for Nearly-Linear Networks

Read original: arXiv:2407.06765 - Published 7/10/2024 by Eugene Golikov
Total Score

0

A Generalization Bound for Nearly-Linear Networks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new generalization bound for neural networks with nearly-linear activation functions.
  • The authors derive a bound that depends on the Lipschitz constant of the network's function, which can be much tighter than existing bounds.
  • The bound applies to a broad class of neural networks, including those with rectified linear unit (ReLU) activations.
  • The authors show that their bound can lead to improved generalization guarantees compared to previous work.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about a mathematical guarantee, called a "generalization bound," for how well neural networks with certain types of activation functions can learn from data. A generalization bound tells you how well a model trained on a limited dataset will perform on new, unseen data.

The key idea is that the authors found a new way to analyze neural networks with "nearly-linear" activation functions, like the popular ReLU (rectified linear unit). Previous bounds for these types of networks were not very tight, meaning the guarantees were not as strong as they could be.

The authors derived a new bound that depends on a quantity called the "Lipschitz constant" of the network's function. This constant measures how much the network's output can change when the input changes a little bit. By capturing this more precisely, the new bound can provide much tighter generalization guarantees than older approaches.

This is important because it gives us a better understanding of how well neural networks with common activation functions like ReLU can learn from a finite dataset and apply that knowledge to new, unseen data. Improving these kinds of theoretical guarantees helps build confidence in the reliability of neural network models.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a new generalization bound for neural networks with "nearly-linear" activation functions, which includes popular choices like the rectified linear unit (ReLU). The bound depends on the Lipschitz constant of the network's function, which measures how much the network's output can change when the input changes slightly.

The authors show that this Lipschitz-based bound can be much tighter than previous bounds for this class of neural networks. Specifically, they derive a bound that scales with the squared root of the Lipschitz constant, rather than linearly as in older approaches. [[Margin-based Multiclass Generalization Bound via Geometric Margin]]

To achieve this, the authors develop a new analysis technique that exploits the nearly-linear structure of the activation functions. This allows them to obtain sharper control over the network's sensitivity to changes in the input.

The authors demonstrate that their new bound can lead to improved generalization guarantees compared to prior work, both in theory and through numerical experiments. They also show that the bound applies to a broad family of neural networks, including those with ReLU activations. [[Quantitative CLTs for Deep Neural Networks]]

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel and theoretically-grounded approach to bounding the generalization performance of neural networks with nearly-linear activation functions. The authors' focus on the Lipschitz constant of the network function is a key insight that allows them to derive tighter bounds than previous methods.

One potential limitation is that the bound still depends on the network architecture and activation functions in a somewhat opaque way, through the Lipschitz constant. It would be valuable to have a better understanding of how the network design choices affect this quantity. [[Generalization Bounds for Causal Regression: Insights, Guarantees, and Sensitivity]]

Additionally, the paper does not explore the practical implications of the new bound in depth. While the authors show that it can lead to improved guarantees, more work is needed to understand how these theoretical results translate to real-world neural network training and deployment. [[PAC-Bayesian Adversarially Robust Generalization Bounds for Graph Neural Networks]]

Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the theoretical analysis of neural network generalization. The authors' techniques and insights could inspire further research to bridge the gap between theory and practice in machine learning.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new generalization bound for neural networks with nearly-linear activation functions, such as ReLU. The key innovation is a bound that depends on the Lipschitz constant of the network's function, which can provide much tighter guarantees than previous approaches.

The authors demonstrate the broad applicability of their bound and show that it can lead to improved generalization performance compared to older bounds. This work advances our theoretical understanding of how neural networks learn from data, which is crucial for building reliable and trustworthy machine learning systems.

While there are still open challenges in translating these theoretical results to practical settings, this paper represents an important step forward in the field of neural network analysis and generalization. It lays the groundwork for further research to bridge the gap between theory and practice in deep learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Generalization Bound for Nearly-Linear Networks
Total Score

0

A Generalization Bound for Nearly-Linear Networks

Eugene Golikov

We consider nonlinear networks as perturbations of linear ones. Based on this approach, we present novel generalization bounds that become non-vacuous for networks that are close to being linear. The main advantage over the previous works which propose non-vacuous generalization bounds is that our bounds are a-priori: performing the actual training is not required for evaluating the bounds. To the best of our knowledge, they are the first non-vacuous generalization bounds for neural nets possessing this property.

Read more

7/10/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Learning Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds from Optimization

Chengli Tan, Jiangshe Zhang, Junmin Liu

One of the fundamental challenges in the deep learning community is to theoretically understand how well a deep neural network generalizes to unseen data. However, current approaches often yield generalization bounds that are either too loose to be informative of the true generalization error or only valid to the compressed nets. In this study, we present a simple yet non-vacuous generalization bound from the optimization perspective. We achieve this goal by leveraging that the hypothesis set accessed by stochastic gradient algorithms is essentially fractal-like and thus can derive a tighter bound over the algorithm-dependent Rademacher complexity. The main argument rests on modeling the discrete-time recursion process via a continuous-time stochastic differential equation driven by fractional Brownian motion. Numerical studies demonstrate that our approach is able to yield plausible generalization guarantees for modern neural networks such as ResNet and Vision Transformer, even when they are trained on a large-scale dataset (e.g. ImageNet-1K).

Read more

7/23/2024

Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds for Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds for Large Language Models

Sanae Lotfi, Marc Finzi, Yilun Kuang, Tim G. J. Rudner, Micah Goldblum, Andrew Gordon Wilson

Modern language models can contain billions of parameters, raising the question of whether they can generalize beyond the training data or simply parrot their training corpora. We provide the first non-vacuous generalization bounds for pretrained large language models (LLMs), indicating that language models are capable of discovering regularities that generalize to unseen data. In particular, we derive a compression bound that is valid for the unbounded log-likelihood loss using prediction smoothing, and we extend the bound to handle subsampling, accelerating bound computation by orders of magnitude on massive datasets. To achieve the extreme level of compression required for non-vacuous bounds, we devise SubLoRA, a simple low-dimensional nonlinear parameterization that leads to non-vacuous generalization bounds for models with nearly a billion parameters. Finally, we use our bounds to understand LLM generalization and find that larger models have better generalization bounds and are more compressible than smaller models.

Read more

7/18/2024

Controlled Learning of Pointwise Nonlinearities in Neural-Network-Like Architectures
Total Score

0

Controlled Learning of Pointwise Nonlinearities in Neural-Network-Like Architectures

Michael Unser, Alexis Goujon, Stanislas Ducotterd

We present a general variational framework for the training of freeform nonlinearities in layered computational architectures subject to some slope constraints. The regularization that we add to the traditional training loss penalizes the second-order total variation of each trainable activation. The slope constraints allow us to impose properties such as 1-Lipschitz stability, firm non-expansiveness, and monotonicity/invertibility. These properties are crucial to ensure the proper functioning of certain classes of signal-processing algorithms (e.g., plug-and-play schemes, unrolled proximal gradient, invertible flows). We prove that the global optimum of the stated constrained-optimization problem is achieved with nonlinearities that are adaptive nonuniform linear splines. We then show how to solve the resulting function-optimization problem numerically by representing the nonlinearities in a suitable (nonuniform) B-spline basis. Finally, we illustrate the use of our framework with the data-driven design of (weakly) convex regularizers for the denoising of images and the resolution of inverse problems.

Read more

8/26/2024