Generative AI Tools in Academic Research: Applications and Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This study examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic research.
- It focuses on the application of GenAI to qualitative and quantitative data analysis.
- GenAI tools offer new possibilities for enhancing research productivity and democratising complex analytical processes.
- However, their integration into academic practice raises significant questions regarding research integrity, security, authorship, and the changing nature of scholarly work.
- The study provides insights into how researchers can utilize GenAI tools responsibly and ethically.
Plain English Explanation
The study looks at how Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is affecting academic research. GenAI tools can help researchers analyze both qualitative and quantitative data more efficiently. This could make research more accessible and productive. However, using these AI tools also raises some important concerns.
For example, there are questions about whether the research done with AI tools can be trusted and replicated. There are also issues around who should be credited as the author of research that uses AI. The study examines these challenges and provides guidance on how researchers can use GenAI tools responsibly and ethically in their work.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents case studies demonstrating the application of GenAI in various research methodologies, including tools for transcription, coding, thematic analysis, visual analytics, and statistical analysis.
It discusses the challenges of ensuring replicability and consistency in AI-assisted research. The study also considers the ethical implications of increased AI integration in academia, exploring both qualitative and quantitative applications of GenAI.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges the limitations and caveats around the use of GenAI in research. It notes the importance of maintaining research integrity and addressing concerns around authorship and security.
While the study provides valuable insights, there may be additional areas for further research, such as the long-term impacts of AI-assisted research on academic culture and the career trajectories of researchers. The paper could also benefit from a more in-depth discussion of potential biases and other issues that can arise from the use of GenAI tools.
Conclusion
This study highlights the significant potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence to enhance academic research, while also raising important questions about the ethical and practical implications of integrating these tools into scholarly practice. As GenAI continues to evolve, ongoing dialogue and research will be crucial to ensuring that it is leveraged in a responsible and sustainable manner that upholds the integrity of academic work.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Generative AI Tools in Academic Research: Applications and Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies
Mike Perkins (British University Vietnam), Jasper Roe (James Cook University Singapore)
This study examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic research, focusing on its application to qualitative and quantitative data analysis. As GenAI tools evolve rapidly, they offer new possibilities for enhancing research productivity and democratising complex analytical processes. However, their integration into academic practice raises significant questions regarding research integrity and security, authorship, and the changing nature of scholarly work. Through an examination of current capabilities and potential future applications, this study provides insights into how researchers may utilise GenAI tools responsibly and ethically. We present case studies that demonstrate the application of GenAI in various research methodologies, discuss the challenges of replicability and consistency in AI-assisted research, and consider the ethical implications of increased AI integration in academia. This study explores both qualitative and quantitative applications of GenAI, highlighting tools for transcription, coding, thematic analysis, visual analytics, and statistical analysis. By addressing these issues, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the role of AI in shaping the future of academic research and provide guidance for researchers exploring the rapidly evolving landscape of AI-assisted research tools and research.
Read more8/14/2024
🤖
0
The collective use and evaluation of generative AI tools in digital humanities research: Survey-based results
Meredith Dedema, Rongqian Ma
The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies has revolutionized research, with significant implications for Digital Humanities (DH), a field inherently intertwined with technological progress. This article investigates how digital humanities scholars adopt, practice, as well as critically evaluate, GenAI technologies such as ChatGPT in the research process. Drawing on 76 responses collected from an international survey study, we explored digital humanities scholars' rationale for GenAI adoption in research, identified specific use cases and practices of using GenAI to support various DH research tasks, and analyzed scholars' collective perceptions of GenAI's benefits, risks, and impact on DH research. The survey results suggest that DH research communities hold divisive sentiments towards the value of GenAI in DH scholarship, whereas the actual usage diversifies among individuals and across research tasks. Our survey-based analysis has the potential to serve as a basis for further empirical research on the impact of GenAI on the evolution of DH scholarship.
Read more4/22/2024
0
Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applications
Sandeep Singh Sengar, Affan Bin Hasan, Sanjay Kumar, Fiona Carroll
In recent years, the study of artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a paradigm shift. This has been propelled by the groundbreaking capabilities of generative models both in supervised and unsupervised learning scenarios. Generative AI has shown state-of-the-art performance in solving perplexing real-world conundrums in fields such as image translation, medical diagnostics, textual imagery fusion, natural language processing, and beyond. This paper documents the systematic review and analysis of recent advancements and techniques in Generative AI with a detailed discussion of their applications including application-specific models. Indeed, the major impact that generative AI has made to date, has been in language generation with the development of large language models, in the field of image translation and several other interdisciplinary applications of generative AI. Moreover, the primary contribution of this paper lies in its coherent synthesis of the latest advancements in these areas, seamlessly weaving together contemporary breakthroughs in the field. Particularly, how it shares an exploration of the future trajectory for generative AI. In conclusion, the paper ends with a discussion of Responsible AI principles, and the necessary ethical considerations for the sustainability and growth of these generative models.
Read more5/21/2024
🤖
0
A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice
Bayode Ogunleye, Kudirat Ibilola Zakariyyah, Oluwaseun Ajao, Olakunle Olayinka, Hemlata Sharma
The use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academia is a subjective and hotly debated topic. Currently, there are no agreed guidelines towards the usage of GenAI systems in higher education (HE) and, thus, it is still unclear how to make effective use of the technology for teaching and learning practice. This paper provides an overview of the current state of research on GenAI for teaching and learning in HE. To this end, this study conducted a systematic review of relevant studies indexed by Scopus, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search criteria revealed a total of 625 research papers, of which 355 met the final inclusion criteria. The findings from the review showed the current state and the future trends in documents, citations, document sources/authors, keywords, and co-authorship. The research gaps identified suggest that while some authors have looked at understanding the detection of AI-generated text, it may be beneficial to understand how GenAI can be incorporated into supporting the educational curriculum for assessments, teaching, and learning delivery. Furthermore, there is a need for additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional studies in HE through collaboration. This will strengthen the awareness and understanding of students, tutors, and other stakeholders, which will be instrumental in formulating guidelines, frameworks, and policies for GenAI usage.
Read more6/17/2024