Graph Machine Learning based Doubly Robust Estimator for Network Causal Effects
2403.11332
0
0
🌐
Abstract
We address the challenge of inferring causal effects in social network data. This results in challenges due to interference -- where a unit's outcome is affected by neighbors' treatments -- and network-induced confounding factors. While there is extensive literature focusing on estimating causal effects in social network setups, a majority of them make prior assumptions about the form of network-induced confounding mechanisms. Such strong assumptions are rarely likely to hold especially in high-dimensional networks. We propose a novel methodology that combines graph machine learning approaches with the double machine learning framework to enable accurate and efficient estimation of direct and peer effects using a single observational social network. We demonstrate the semiparametric efficiency of our proposed estimator under mild regularity conditions, allowing for consistent uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate that our method is accurate, robust, and scalable via an extensive simulation study. We use our method to investigate the impact of Self-Help Group participation on financial risk tolerance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper addresses the challenge of inferring causal effects in social network data, which is complicated by issues like interference (where a person's outcome is affected by their neighbors' treatments) and network-induced confounding factors.
- The authors propose a novel methodology that combines graph machine learning approaches with the double machine learning framework to enable accurate and efficient estimation of direct and peer effects using a single observational social network.
- The proposed estimator is shown to be semiparametrically efficient under mild conditions, allowing for consistent uncertainty quantification.
- The method is demonstrated to be accurate, robust, and scalable through simulations, and is used to investigate the impact of Self-Help Group participation on financial risk tolerance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles a tricky problem in social science research: how to figure out the causal effects of something (like joining a group) on people's behavior or outcomes, when those people are all connected in a social network.
The challenge is that in a social network, a person's outcome can be affected not just by their own "treatment" (like joining the group), but also by the treatments of the people they're connected to. This "interference" between people makes it hard to isolate the true causal effects.
Additionally, the structure of the social network itself can introduce "confounding factors" that influence both people's treatments and their outcomes, further complicating the analysis.
To address these challenges, the authors developed a new method that combines advanced machine learning techniques with a statistical framework called double machine learning. This allows them to accurately estimate both the direct effects of a treatment on a person, as well as the "peer effects" - how a person's outcome is influenced by the treatments of their friends and connections.
Importantly, this new method doesn't require making strong assumptions about the specific ways the social network structure might be influencing the causal relationships - it can adapt to the complexities of real-world social networks. The authors show through simulations and a real-world case study that their approach is accurate, robust, and can be scaled up to large social networks.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel doubly robust causal effect estimation method for social network data that addresses the challenges of interference and network-induced confounding.
The authors leverage graph machine learning techniques, specifically neural networks with causal graph constraints, to model the complex dependence structure induced by the social network. This is combined with the double machine learning framework, which provides semiparametric efficiency and consistent uncertainty quantification.
The proposed estimator is shown to be doubly robust - it remains consistent if either the treatment model or the outcome model is correctly specified. This allows the method to adapt to a wide range of network structures and interference patterns, without requiring strong prior assumptions.
The authors demonstrate the accuracy, robustness, and scalability of their approach through extensive simulations. They also apply the method to study the impact of Self-Help Group participation on financial risk tolerance, showcasing its practical utility for causal inference in social network settings.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes important contributions to the field of causal inference in social networks by proposing a flexible and efficient estimation method. A key strength is the lack of strong assumptions about the specific form of network-induced confounding, which is a common limitation of prior work in this area.
However, the authors acknowledge that their method relies on the assumption of unconfounded exposure - that is, the network structure itself is not influenced by unobserved confounders. While this is a reasonable assumption in many settings, it may not hold in all cases, and further research is needed to relax this requirement.
Additionally, the paper focuses on estimating average causal effects, but does not address the challenge of heterogeneous treatment effects - where the causal impact varies across individuals or subgroups. Extending the proposed methodology to handle this scenario could further enhance its practical utility.
Overall, the authors have made a valuable contribution to the field, but there are still opportunities for further methodological development and real-world applications to deepen our understanding of causal relationships in social networks.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel, flexible, and efficient method for estimating causal effects in social network data. By combining graph machine learning and double machine learning techniques, the authors have developed an approach that can handle the complex interference and confounding challenges inherent in social network settings.
The demonstrated accuracy, robustness, and scalability of the proposed estimator, as well as its application to a real-world case study, highlight the practical utility of this work. As social networks continue to play a crucial role in shaping individual and societal outcomes, tools like this will become increasingly important for researchers and policymakers seeking to understand and harness the power of social connections.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learning
Weilin Chen, Ruichu Cai, Zeqin Yang, Jie Qiao, Yuguang Yan, Zijian Li, Zhifeng Hao
0
0
Causal effect estimation under networked interference is an important but challenging problem. Available parametric methods are limited in their model space, while previous semiparametric methods, e.g., leveraging neural networks to fit only one single nuisance function, may still encounter misspecification problems under networked interference without appropriate assumptions on the data generation process. To mitigate bias stemming from misspecification, we propose a novel doubly robust causal effect estimator under networked interference, by adapting the targeted learning technique to the training of neural networks. Specifically, we generalize the targeted learning technique into the networked interference setting and establish the condition under which an estimator achieves double robustness. Based on the condition, we devise an end-to-end causal effect estimator by transforming the identified theoretical condition into a targeted loss. Moreover, we provide a theoretical analysis of our designed estimator, revealing a faster convergence rate compared to a single nuisance model. Extensive experimental results on two real-world networks with semisynthetic data demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed estimators.
5/20/2024
Neural Networks with Causal Graph Constraints: A New Approach for Treatment Effects Estimation
Roger Pros, Jordi Vitri`a
0
0
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in using machine learning techniques for the estimation of treatment effects. Most of the best-performing methods rely on representation learning strategies that encourage shared behavior among potential outcomes to increase the precision of treatment effect estimates. In this paper we discuss and classify these models in terms of their algorithmic inductive biases and present a new model, NN-CGC, that considers additional information from the causal graph. NN-CGC tackles bias resulting from spurious variable interactions by implementing novel constraints on models, and it can be integrated with other representation learning methods. We test the effectiveness of our method using three different base models on common benchmarks. Our results indicate that our model constraints lead to significant improvements, achieving new state-of-the-art results in treatment effects estimation. We also show that our method is robust to imperfect causal graphs and that using partial causal information is preferable to ignoring it.
4/19/2024
Uplift Modeling Under Limited Supervision
George Panagopoulos, Daniele Malitesta, Fragkiskos D. Malliaros, Jun Pang
0
0
Estimating causal effects in e-commerce tends to involve costly treatment assignments which can be impractical in large-scale settings. Leveraging machine learning to predict such treatment effects without actual intervention is a standard practice to diminish the risk. However, existing methods for treatment effect prediction tend to rely on training sets of substantial size, which are built from real experiments and are thus inherently risky to create. In this work we propose a graph neural network to diminish the required training set size, relying on graphs that are common in e-commerce data. Specifically, we view the problem as node regression with a restricted number of labeled instances, develop a two-model neural architecture akin to previous causal effect estimators, and test varying message-passing layers for encoding. Furthermore, as an extra step, we combine the model with an acquisition function to guide the creation of the training set in settings with extremely low experimental budget. The framework is flexible since each step can be used separately with other models or treatment policies. The experiments on real large-scale networks indicate a clear advantage of our methodology over the state of the art, which in many cases performs close to random, underlining the need for models that can generalize with limited supervision to reduce experimental risks.
6/10/2024
Estimating Causal Effects with Double Machine Learning -- A Method Evaluation
Jonathan Fuhr, Philipp Berens, Dominik Papies
0
0
The estimation of causal effects with observational data continues to be a very active research area. In recent years, researchers have developed new frameworks which use machine learning to relax classical assumptions necessary for the estimation of causal effects. In this paper, we review one of the most prominent methods - double/debiased machine learning (DML) - and empirically evaluate it by comparing its performance on simulated data relative to more traditional statistical methods, before applying it to real-world data. Our findings indicate that the application of a suitably flexible machine learning algorithm within DML improves the adjustment for various nonlinear confounding relationships. This advantage enables a departure from traditional functional form assumptions typically necessary in causal effect estimation. However, we demonstrate that the method continues to critically depend on standard assumptions about causal structure and identification. When estimating the effects of air pollution on housing prices in our application, we find that DML estimates are consistently larger than estimates of less flexible methods. From our overall results, we provide actionable recommendations for specific choices researchers must make when applying DML in practice.
5/1/2024