Graphical Perception of Saliency-based Model Explanations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Investigates how users perceive and interpret saliency-based explanations of deep neural network models
- Conducted a user study to evaluate the effectiveness of different saliency visualization techniques
- Explored how saliency maps can be used to explain model decisions in an intuitive and understandable way
Plain English Explanation
This paper looks at how people understand and interpret saliency maps, which are visual representations that highlight the parts of an image that a deep learning model focuses on when making a prediction. The researchers wanted to see how effective different ways of displaying these saliency maps are at helping people understand why a model made a particular decision.
They did this by running a user study where they showed people different saliency visualizations and asked them to explain what the model was focusing on and why it made its prediction. This allowed the researchers to see which saliency visualization techniques were the most intuitive and easy for people to understand.
The goal was to find ways to make these saliency-based explanations of deep learning models more accessible and understandable to non-experts. By improving the graphical perception of these explanations, the researchers hope to make it easier for people to trust and interpret the decisions made by complex AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a user study that evaluates the effectiveness of different saliency visualization techniques for explaining the decisions of deep neural network models. The researchers compared several saliency map representations, including heatmaps, contour plots, and grayscale images.
Participants were shown images along with saliency-based model explanations and asked to describe what the model was focusing on and why it made its prediction. The researchers measured various metrics, such as task performance, cognitive load, and qualitative feedback, to assess the effectiveness of each visualization technique.
The results suggest that certain saliency map representations, like contour plots, can be more intuitive and easier for people to understand compared to other techniques. The paper also discusses how the choice of saliency visualization can impact users' ability to accurately interpret model decisions, particularly for more complex neural network architectures.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the challenges of making saliency-based model explanations accessible and understandable to non-experts. One limitation is that the study was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, which may not fully capture the real-world challenges of interpreting saliency maps in practical applications.
Additionally, the paper does not address how the choice of saliency computation method (e.g., Grad-CAM, Integrated Gradients) might impact the effectiveness of the visualizations. Different saliency techniques could produce varying levels of interpretability, which is an area for further research.
It would also be interesting to explore how user characteristics, such as domain expertise and cognitive abilities, might influence the effectiveness of different saliency visualization techniques. Incorporating more diverse user groups and real-world tasks could provide additional insights into the practical implications of this work.
Conclusion
This paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of explainable AI by investigating how users perceive and interpret saliency-based explanations of deep neural network models. The user study findings suggest that certain saliency visualization techniques, like contour plots, can be more intuitive and effective at helping people understand model decisions.
By improving the graphical perception of saliency maps, the researchers aim to make it easier for non-experts to trust and interpret the outputs of complex AI systems. This is an important step towards developing more transparent and accountable machine learning models that can be effectively deployed in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Graphical Perception of Saliency-based Model Explanations
Yayan Zhao, Mingwei Li, Matthew Berger
In recent years, considerable work has been devoted to explaining predictive, deep learning-based models, and in turn how to evaluate explanations. An important class of evaluation methods are ones that are human-centered, which typically require the communication of explanations through visualizations. And while visualization plays a critical role in perceiving and understanding model explanations, how visualization design impacts human perception of explanations remains poorly understood. In this work, we study the graphical perception of model explanations, specifically, saliency-based explanations for visual recognition models. We propose an experimental design to investigate how human perception is influenced by visualization design, wherein we study the task of alignment assessment, or whether a saliency map aligns with an object in an image. Our findings show that factors related to visualization design decisions, the type of alignment, and qualities of the saliency map all play important roles in how humans perceive saliency-based visual explanations.
Read more6/13/2024
0
Towards A Comprehensive Visual Saliency Explanation Framework for AI-based Face Recognition Systems
Yuhang Lu, Zewei Xu, Touradj Ebrahimi
Over recent years, deep convolutional neural networks have significantly advanced the field of face recognition techniques for both verification and identification purposes. Despite the impressive accuracy, these neural networks are often criticized for lacking explainability. There is a growing demand for understanding the decision-making process of AI-based face recognition systems. Some studies have investigated the use of visual saliency maps as explanations, but they have predominantly focused on the specific face verification case. The discussion on more general face recognition scenarios and the corresponding evaluation methodology for these explanations have long been absent in current research. Therefore, this manuscript conceives a comprehensive explanation framework for face recognition tasks. Firstly, an exhaustive definition of visual saliency map-based explanations for AI-based face recognition systems is provided, taking into account the two most common recognition situations individually, i.e., face verification and identification. Secondly, a new model-agnostic explanation method named CorrRISE is proposed to produce saliency maps, which reveal both the similar and dissimilar regions between any given face images. Subsequently, the explanation framework conceives a new evaluation methodology that offers quantitative measurement and comparison of the performance of general visual saliency explanation methods in face recognition. Consequently, extensive experiments are carried out on multiple verification and identification scenarios. The results showcase that CorrRISE generates insightful saliency maps and demonstrates superior performance, particularly in similarity maps in comparison with the state-of-the-art explanation approaches.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Evaluating Saliency Explanations in NLP by Crowdsourcing
Xiaotian Lu, Jiyi Li, Zhen Wan, Xiaofeng Lin, Koh Takeuchi, Hisashi Kashima
Deep learning models have performed well on many NLP tasks. However, their internal mechanisms are typically difficult for humans to understand. The development of methods to explain models has become a key issue in the reliability of deep learning models in many important applications. Various saliency explanation methods, which give each feature of input a score proportional to the contribution of output, have been proposed to determine the part of the input which a model values most. Despite a considerable body of work on the evaluation of saliency methods, whether the results of various evaluation metrics agree with human cognition remains an open question. In this study, we propose a new human-based method to evaluate saliency methods in NLP by crowdsourcing. We recruited 800 crowd workers and empirically evaluated seven saliency methods on two datasets with the proposed method. We analyzed the performance of saliency methods, compared our results with existing automated evaluation methods, and identified notable differences between NLP and computer vision (CV) fields when using saliency methods. The instance-level data of our crowdsourced experiments and the code to reproduce the explanations are available at https://github.com/xtlu/lreccoling_evaluation.
Read more5/20/2024
0
Interpretable Network Visualizations: A Human-in-the-Loop Approach for Post-hoc Explainability of CNN-based Image Classification
Matteo Bianchi, Antonio De Santis, Andrea Tocchetti, Marco Brambilla
Transparency and explainability in image classification are essential for establishing trust in machine learning models and detecting biases and errors. State-of-the-art explainability methods generate saliency maps to show where a specific class is identified, without providing a detailed explanation of the model's decision process. Striving to address such a need, we introduce a post-hoc method that explains the entire feature extraction process of a Convolutional Neural Network. These explanations include a layer-wise representation of the features the model extracts from the input. Such features are represented as saliency maps generated by clustering and merging similar feature maps, to which we associate a weight derived by generalizing Grad-CAM for the proposed methodology. To further enhance these explanations, we include a set of textual labels collected through a gamified crowdsourcing activity and processed using NLP techniques and Sentence-BERT. Finally, we show an approach to generate global explanations by aggregating labels across multiple images.
Read more5/7/2024